0.027%, for cohorts I and II, whereby the risk difference was highly significant ( p < 0.001; log-rank test).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
In the Oldenburg sentence test (OlSa) there was a highly significant change ( p < 0.1%) for S 0 , S 0 N 0 , and S 0 N CI configurations and a very significant change ( p < 1%) for S 0 N HA (HA: hearing aid).
Notably, the pathways tryptophan metabolism, lysine degradation, arginine and proline metabolism, and ABC transporters exhibited highly significant differences ( p < 0.001).
Mean cross-sectional area There is a highly significant ( p < 0.001) increase in meanCSA in all protrusion steps and all parts of the pharynx of 20.0 mm 2 (± 9.8) per millimeter.
The difference in weight-for-age z -score by hukou status is also highly significant ( p < 0.001) for children with rural residence, but only significant at the 10 % level for those with urban residence.
The relationship between DBD and CCA was highly significant (AOR = 3.46; 95% CI 2.74–4.36) followed by LM (AOR = 2.28; 95% CI 1.81–2.86) P value < 0.001.
This separation was highly significant (Mann–Whitney U test, p < 0.001) and persisted across years, cultivars, and fertilisation treatments.
Both predictors demonstrated highly significant associations with mSLI ( p < 0.001), with their smooth terms exhibiting a consistent upward trend.
On the testing day (day three), the DI was tested against chance level (50%) and it was found to be highly significant above 50% for both the control non-stressed mice (one-sample t-test, p<0.001) and the MR-tg non-stressed mice (one-sample t-test, p<0.001).
There was a highly significant difference among the three groups (SC, BA and AA: 59.54 ± 3.37, 53.84 ± 1.93 and 52.41 ± 2.87, respectively; F = 67.848, p < 0.001).
The likelihood ratio test for adding the Norton scale to the APACHE II model to predict post-ICU mortality was highly significant (χ 2 = 31.26; df = 1; p < 0.001).
Additionally, there was a highly significant 3-way interaction (category/time-point × vaccination status × FMDV RNA load; p < 0.001): FMDV RNA load had a significant positive influence on IFN-γ and IFN-λ expression in vaccinated animals early after infection (24 hpi; p<0.01 for both), as well as on IFN-λ in non-vaccinated animals that were viremic/pre-clinical (Category II; p<0.001) ( Fig 3 ).
Highly significant differences (p<0.001) are marked with ***, differences with medium significance (p<0.01) with ** and with low significance (p<0.05) with *.
Differences in neutralization titers between arms for single variants were statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001), except for the differences between titers against the Alpha variant in the nVP and in VP groups, which were also statistically significant ( p < 0.05).
The statistical comparison of observed and expected additive toxicities, with respect to toxicity unit (TU difference), using Student’s t -test, was found to be highly significant ( p < 0.001).
For CFT, the time effect was highly significant (β = −5.57 μm per month, p < 0.001), whereas neither the group main effect (β = −12.55 μm, p = 0.70) nor the time × group interaction (β = −0.43 μm per month, p = 0.84) was significant.
Statistical analysis revealed that the sample factor exerted a highly significant influence ( p < 0.001) on all quantified fatty acids ( Table 2 ), with partial eta squared values ranging from 0.794 to 0.993, underscoring the dominant contribution of biological variability to hempseed lipid composition.
Across all model specifications, the likelihood-ratio tests were highly significant ( p < 0.001).
Interestingly, root N concentration (RNC) and nodule N concentration (NNC) exhibited a highly significant negative correlation ( p < 0.001) during both the V9 and R5 periods ( Figure 8 c,d). 3.
A highly significant difference was observed among the treatment groups ( p < 0.001).
Three of the control variables (female age distribution, fertility change, and ratio of proportions dead) were highly significant (p<0.001), and the fourth (lagged HIV prevalence) was significant at 5%.
In contrast, the anti-TPO (−) group displayed a highly significant difference in platelet counts across the time points ( p < 0.001), with a similar median increase in the platelet count (48,500 [IQR: (−2000) to 101,500]).
Of these six (35.3%) found a highly significant ( p < 0.001) increase [ 27 , 28 , 35 , 37 , 38 , 40 ].
Linear mixed-model results ( Table 2 ) showed that biochar application rate had highly significant effects on organic matter, alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen, available phosphorus, available potassium, total phosphorus, pH, and total nitrogen ( p < 0.001), whereas its effect on total potassium was not significant ( p = 0.734).
In addition, group (D) results showed highly significant values than other groups with lower mean values except for UC-MSCs and group (C) (p<0.001).