“highly significant”

Acoustic startle response measured in another cohort of mice (9 controls and 10 mutants aged 9 weeks) showed an altered curve: there was a highly significant interaction between genotype and startle pulse intensity (F (7,11) = 4.153, p<0.001), and Bonferroni posthoc tests revealed a significantly lower response of mutants at maximum dB (p<0.01, Fig. 2F ).

Further analysis of in–stock data using DiD analysis showed a highly significant improvement ( P < 0.001) in the QCs group compared with the NI group for the key composite indicator of all five iCCM products in stock on DOV.

The statistical analysis revealed highly significant differences with moderate to strong effect sizes on the multivariate level [ F (6,214) = 7.05, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.17], on the univariate level for the PTSD severity [ F (3,108) = 5.88, p = 0.001, η p 2 = 0.14] and for the sum score of the regularly experienced violence [ F (3,108) = 14.09, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.28].

The variation among populations was 5.06% and was highly significant ( P < 0.001), and the proportions of variance among varieties and among populations within varieties were also significant, i.e. , 1.98% and 3.05%, respectively ( Table 3 ).

This difference (about 302.6 min) was highly significant ( P < 0.001) statistically as well as clinically [ Table 4 and Figure 1 ].

Despite being highly significant, this relationship was very weak with an r of only 0.1 (PC1, r = 0.1, p<0.001, Fig. 4B ).

For the number comparison task, results revealed a highly significant NDE regarding both RT [ t (15) = –4.79, p < .001] and errors [ t (15) = 4.86, p < .001] indicating that children were significantly slower and less accurate for number pairs with a small distance (1,443 msec, 15.4% errors) as compared to pairs with a large distance (1,295 msec, 6.3% errors).

In all cases, P <0.05 was considered as significant, P <0.01 highly significant, and P <0.001 very highly significant, which was noted in figures and tables with asterisks.

This difference from the number of patients resuscitated within the competences of the EMT or PM is highly significant (p<0.001).

When the RBS values are compared between control and diabetic groups, there was huge margin of increase in blood glucose, which was highly significant ( P < 0.001).

Highly significant improvements were found for the main spinal parameters: TK reduced from 54.8±10° to 44.8±10° (p<0,001), LL from 55.1±8.28° to 50.9±9° (p=0.04), SI from 113.1±21mm to 89±30mm (p=0.003) and C7 from 58.6±12mm to 47.5±13mm (p=0,001); while L3 changed from 53±12mm to 47±13mm (NS).

there are other explanatory variables), the very large sample size (10 695) makes the effect of phylogeny highly significant ( P < 0·001).

There was a highly significant correlation between inattention of HKD and inattention of ADHD ( R s = 0.98; p < 0.001) (Table 1 ).

It is routine practice to transpose basilic vein during proximal brachiobasilic fistulas[ 21 ] In a series of 70 patients with brachiobasilic fistulas in order to gain easy access to veins, Hossny[ 22 ] observed that all dialysis nurses were satisfied with the transposed veins, but only 53.3% were satisfied with the elevated veins; the difference was statistically highly significant ( P < 0.001).

It was seen that all the morbidities were more prevalent in EG, that is, Group A and the difference of prevalence of morbidities between Group A and B was found to be statistically highly significant ( P < 0.001), except the musculoskeletal disorders in which difference in prevalence was not statistically significant.

However, this appeared to depend almost uniquely on the highly significant differences that were seen in velocity measurements with versus without steer angle correction ( p < 0.001).

Cumulative frequency plots (Figure 1 B) show a highly significant increase in inter-event interval (i.e. a decrease in event frequency) induced by DAMGO (KS test P < 0.001 vs. baseline) that persisted after 10-min incubation and was reversed by the opioid agonist naloxone.

Effect of time was highly significant from retrospective-to-training F(1,177) = 44.73, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.202, from retrospectively-to-prospectively F(1,177) = 16.844, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.087, and over the whole time frame retrospectively-training-prospectively F(1,177) = 28.733, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.140.

niloticus of T1 (control non-exposed) and T4 (pollen exposed) displayed a highly significant ( P < 0.001) increase in estradiol levels as compared with those groups (T3, T5) exposed to malathion and fed basal diet ( Fig. 3 G).

Prothrombin time was 15.69 ± 1.76 seconds in group A as compared to 14.37 ± 1.7 seconds in group B, which was highly significant ( P > 0.001).

These differences were highly significant ( P < 0.001, ANOVA).

The associations were statistically highly significant ( P < 0.001) between all pairs of the following groups: in the low prevalence group (<5%) 3% of the children were assigned to diagnoses, in the moderate prevalence group (≥20%) 38%, and in the high prevalence group (≥75%) 93% of the children.

Moreover, when fold changes for Notch1 and Hes7 mRNA are plotted relative to each other for all samples analysed, there is a highly significant positive correlation ( F 1,13 =21.04; P ≤0.001), which is not the case for Dll1 and Hes7 or for Dll1 and Notch1 ( Fig. 3 F-H; data not shown).

We investigated this interaction reducing the model by age the improvement in performance for the left hand after right hand training was a trend in the younger, F (1, 9) = 4.518, p = .062, η 2 p = .334), but highly significant in the older with a high effect size, F (1, 11) = 36.240, p < .001, η 2 p = .767.

Despite the fact that in the total population the decrease in the angulation between the mandibular plane and the axis of the mandibular central incisors was highly significant (mean = −10.24°, P < 0.001), an increase in alveolar height, expressed as the distance from the “D” point to the alveolar crest, was not evident in 42.4% of the cases.