“highly significant”

For fat content, highly significant differences were also detected in fat content among the cultivars (p value < 0.001).

Moreover, the chi-square test results showed a highly significant association between the intervention and changes in risk levels (χ2 = 28.214, df = 2, p < 0.001), supporting the effectiveness of the intervention as given in Table 6 .

A highly significant positive correlation was observed between the SLL test and the JSSF ankle/hindfoot scale (r s = 0.71, p < 0.001).

The combined PTL was a highly significant predictor of death (p = 0.001), and the CCI remained significant, as well as eGFR, neutrophil number, CRP and SpO 2 (p < 0.05 each).

A highly significant difference ( P <0.001) was observed between the Gold alloy and the two other groups.

We have documented, highly significant ( P ≤ 0.001) increase in cellular levels of H 2 O 2 , MDA and EL in plants exposed to Cd toxicity ( Table 2 ).

The correlation between mutated TP53 status and liquid biopsy positivity became highly significant at the time of disease progression, when the TP53 results of liquid biopsies were also considered (69% vs. 19%, P<0.001, Table 1 ).

Differences in CI between the two measuring methods did not reach significance, whereas the calculated CVAI showed a 0.74-fold decrease using 3D digital photography and was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

P53 and ribavirin were treated as different factors and both of them were highly significant (p<10 −3 ).

The continuous variables (altitude and snow) are both highly significant ( p < 0.001), although with values of different signs.

However, increase in extracellular Ca 2+ concentration to 1 μM showed a highly significant (p<0.001) reduction of Li + currents through nc DHPR (I max = −0.47 ± 0.10 pA/pF; n = 8) compared to wt (I max = −1.68 ± 0.25 pA/pF; n = 6) myotubes ( Figure 3b ).

The overall adjusted R 2 of this model was highly significant (P < 0.001) and equal to 0.35.

The genotypic variation was highly significant (P<0.001) at two severe stressed (Beg-WL and Hyd-DT) and two moderate stress sites (Hyd-WL and Nht-DT).

Soil depth had a highly significant effect ( p < 0.001) in all three grassland systems on POR and BD, and mainly on VWC.

Furthermore, the box plot showed a highly significant difference in the mean expression levels of RBMS3 between NPC tumors and non-tumor samples (p<0.001; Fig. 1B ).

3.5 SARS-CoV-2 antibody-temperature-responsive polymer enrichment efficacy evaluation SARS-CoV-2 antibody-temperature-responsive polymer supported with free polymer showed a highly significant enrichment capacity after applying thermal precipitation compared to the control one without applying thermal precipitation, p-value < 0.001 as shown in Fig. 5 where no. of enrichment folds was increased to reach around 71-fold after thermal induction. 3.6 Antigen enrichment using SARS-CoV-2 antibo

When comparing subcutaneous suturing speed between consultants and trainees using conventional suture devices, there was a highly significant difference (median of 1.98 ± 0.79 cm/min vs. 1.45 ± 0.37 cm/min, p < 0.001, Fig. 2 c).

Correlation between right and left-side rSO 2 baseline values was strong and highly significant (r=0.85, p<0.001).

Additionally, the ATS revealed a highly significant main effect of time, F (3.00, ∞) = 7.77, p < 0.001.

The positive correlation remained highly significant (P<0.001) when adjusted for age, sex, marital status, education, smoking status, drinking status, BMI, waistline, SBP and DBP.

Moreover, the decrease of bisecting GlcNAc structures in cancer cells was found to be highly significant ( p < 0.001), which is in line with the fact that these types of structures are the main discriminators in the multivariate statistical analysis.

The overall model was highly significant (F = 15.56, p = 0.001), explaining 3.225 units of variance out of 5.414 total inertia, corresponding to approximately 59.57% of the total variation ( Figure 4 D).

FND-CTSI showed a highly significant correlation with the length of hospital and intensive care unit stays (P < 0.001).

As expected, a main effect of Disorder was highly significant ( F (1,54) = 86.99, p < 0.001; effect size, eta-squared η 2 = 0.62), with SZ patients being less accurate than TD controls.

The former was large, negative and highly significant ( F s = −26.244, P <0.001), showing the occurrence of a larger than expected number of singleton mutations, as expected for populations that underwent a population expansion.