When samples from the inside and outside of syringes were examined separately, the contaminated samples from the outside of syringes had a highly significant longer examination time ( p < 0.001) of 1.88 ± 1.28 h (median 1.50 h; IQR 1.25 h) compared to 1.08 ± 0.47 h (median 1.00 h; IQR 0.55 h) for uncontaminated samples.
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
Test‐retest reliability When n = 116 patients were given the pCPQ twice, that is, before and 30 minutes after drinking the lactose solution, their paired scores for the five items did not change significantly ( P > .05 for all items), while the correlation of items was highly significant ( P < .001 for all items) (Table 3 ).
Results We observed a borderline significant ( p = 0.06) reduction in 5hmC levels in PC compared to NM tissue samples, which was explained by a highly significant ( p < 0.001) loss of 5hmC in ERG− PCs.
While analyzing the various hormones in the 2 nd trimester, it was found that difference in the mean TSH levels between controls and cases was highly significant ( P = 0.001).
Difference in SOFA score of patients of Group I (4.39 ± 1.13) and Group II (3.33 ± 0.86) was found to be statistically highly significant P < 0.001 [ Table 2 ]. 60.0% (90) patients were discharged from the hospital, rest of the patients (40%) expired, though higher number of patients of Group II (sepsis without AKI) (61.61%) were discharged in uneventful condition as compared to Group I (sepsis with AKI) (55.26%) and difference was statistically not significant [ Figure 1 ].
As shown in Table 5 , there was a highly significant association between preoperative difficulty scores and intraoperative outcomes (all p <0.001).
Wearing a glove leads to a highly significant increase of force reduction from 61.6 N/s in the baseline condition to 89.5 N/s in the glove condition (PostHoc: t (21) = − 6.8, p < 0.001, d = − 1.5, BF 10 > 100).
About systemic and gastrointestinal symptoms ( Table 2 ), a highly significant reduction ( p < 0.001) of stool blood, abdominal pain, and fatigue was reported at 12 months after surgery.
Group 4 showed a marked reduction in the OHI(S) score measured from baseline to 6 weeks, when compared to the other three groups which wa statistically very highly significant ( P < 0.001) The mean MGI score was compared at baseline, 1 week, 2 weeks, and 6 weeks home, Group 4 showed a marked reduction in the MGI score measured from baseline to 6 weeks, when compared to the other three groups.
Both sine and cosine terms were highly significant ( p < 0.001), indicating a cyclical pattern in ASF detection, with higher prevalence during winter months and lower prevalence in summer (July, August) (Table 5 ).
The nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test (SPSS 21) was applied for statistical analysis to figure out significant ( p < 0.05) and highly significant ( p < 0.001) parameters differentiating between patients with glaucoma and controls.
An exponential curve [150.04-94.1(0.9646 x )] was found to explain 73% of the variation (highly significant at P < 0.001) for the size of largest polymer present regressed on polymeric fructan content in July (Figure 2A ).
The Bartlett's test of sphericity matrix was highly significant ( p < .001); (b) Pearson correlation coefficient among 52 variables ranged from .35 to .698; (c) results of item correlation analysis showed that there was one item (Item 5—.295) with low corrected item-total correlation ( < .30; Cristobal et al., 2007 ).
The analysis of the RAT treatment (experimental phase) revealed a highly significant effect for the AM kinematic parameter (F(1,56) = 88.87, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.6, OP = 1), as well as for the kinetic parameters of FF (F(1,56) = 139.36, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.7, OP = 1) and EF (F(1,56) = 124.7, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.7, OP = 1) measured with the robot.
This effect was highly significant compared to all other groups (p < 0.001), indicating a synergistic suppression of MMP-2 when both agents are administered concurrently ( Fig 3A ).
The difference between the phagocytic indices between the cases and controls was found to be highly significant [ P < 0.001; Table 1 ].
Phosphate levels decline with increasing body weights in both sexes ( Figure 4A ), as confirmed by mixed effect model ANOVA together with the company, study year and subject, where the likelihood ratio tests for the body weight classes were statistically highly significant (females: chi 2 = 1562.2, df = 7, p < 0.001, males: chi 2 = 4366.3, df = 15, p < 0.001).
The effect of time was, unsurprisingly, highly significant ( p < 0.001).
3.4 Survival estimates according to LRGmax, LRGsum, and LRG ratio The DFS difference was highly significant ( p < 0.001), as were the differences between the groups of LRGmax 0–1 and LRGmax 2–3 ( p < 0.001), the groups of LRGmax 0–1 and LRGmax 4–5 ( p < 0.001) and the groups of LRGmax 2–3 and LRGmax 4–5 ( p = 0.002, Table 2 , Figure 3A ).
This difference was highly significant ( Fig. 2C ; P < 0.001 t-test; six experiments, 91 cells).
The difference between these two correlations (0.52 versus −0.13) was highly significant ( p < 0.001).
These differences remained highly significant after weighting (AMD for FTO = 4.76; p < 0.001 and AMD for MC4R = − 0.91; p < 0.001) (Table 2 ).
In contrast, the spatial error model’s error term coefficient was highly significant ( λ = −0.982, p < 0.001).
The JBJ population demonstrated a highly significant difference from the MRN population, whereas the TRJ population demonstrated intermediate between the two populations for the character of eye length (EL) ( p < 0.001).
Correlations between domain scores in the draft and brief versions of SPEED were high (>0.85) and highly significant (p<0.001).