“highly significant”

Results revealed highly significant differences across cultural groups for all three variables ( p < 0.001), confirming that cultural background not only influences students' sports participation behaviors but also meaningfully shapes their perceptions of basketball culture and their psychological adjustment processes.

The repeated measures ANOVA of the within-session CoV revealed the impact of the volumetry tool to be highly significant (p < 0.001), whereas the tool * CART-based categorization interaction effect did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.595).

According to a recent follow-up analysis after 3 years, MP + bortezomib has a highly significant impact on improved OS (HR, 0.653; P < .001), with an associated 35% reduction in risk of death.

Correlation analysis ( Figure 8A ) revealed the following relationships: AMF colonization rate was significantly positively correlated with soil pH ( p < 0.05) and highly significantly positively correlated with AP ( p < 0.001), whereas it was significantly negatively correlated with SOM ( p < 0.05); colonization intensity showed a highly significant positive correlation with AP ( p < 0.001); spore density was significantly positively correlated with SOM ( p < 0.05) and urease (highly significant, p < 0.001), but highly significantly negatively correlated with TN ( p < 0.001).

Exogenous melatonin treatment (MS) further dramatically increased the MT level to 505.0 μg·g -1 , which was 78.9% and 63.1% higher than that of the CK and S groups, respectively, and the differences between the groups all reached highly significant levels ( P <0.001).

Highly significant ( p < 0.001) but weak positive correlations were found among all biomarkers of inflammation, using Spearman’s correlation coefficient ( r s ): total leukocyte count and NLR ( r s = 0.263), total leukocyte count and CRP ( r s = 0.262), and NLR and CRP ( r s = 0.062).

The high-dose treatments of ADSP (ADSP-HD) and AFP (AFP-HD) led to more pronounced reductions, with highly significant differences ( p < 0.001).

Similarly, a highly significant positive correlation was found between glycated hemoglobin and plasma leptin concentration (r=+0.9890; n=23; P<0.001), without a negative xy product.

Joint state was the most highly significant variable when analyzed independently, as well as with every other possible combination of variables included in the model ( P = 0.001).

For mean values of different age groups Anova showed highly significant differences at P < 0.001 between at least two age groups for PSA values.

45.67 ± 8.79, 47.41 ± 10.15 and 50.86 ± 9.32 respectively) with highly significant different results ( p < 0.001).

There was a highly significant correlation between smoking and drinking and SOD (p < 0.001).

All comparisons with artificially balanced Test-2 remained highly significant ( P <.001), reflecting its intentional difference in class ratio.

Median confidence increased from not at all confident to somewhat confident, a highly significant improvement (Wilcoxon z = 5.11, p < 0.001, r = 0.84).

Second, I extended these analyses to the genotypic level by comparing least-square means from ANOVAs in cases where both focal and neighbour genotype exerted a highly significant effect on the performance variable ( P <0.001–0.01).

There was no significant correlation between incisal bite force and overjet or overbite, but there was a highly significant difference (p < 0.001) between the males and females for maximum bite force at intercuspal position, with males biting harder than the females.

Results and discussion Variance estimates and G × E interaction Both the combined ANOVA (Table 3 ) and the AMMI model analysis (Table 4 ) revealed highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) among genotypes, environments, and GEI for the majority of yield and related traits evaluated across six test environments.

For BILAR, lower values were strongly associated with mortality, with BILAR < 5 showing a highly significant correlation ( p < 0.001) (Fig. 1 ).

The correlation coefficients ranged from moderate to very high (with r ranging from 0.6 to 0.9), all highly significant ( p < 0.001).

All intermediate timepoints (3, 6, and 12 months) also showed highly significant improvements compared to baseline (all p < 0.001) with stable distributions compared to 1 month (all p > 0.05) (Fig. 2 ).

Statistical analysis revealed a highly significant difference between the two methods (paired t-test, p < 0.001), with the Model 1 outperforming the doctor by an average of 0.20 to 0.22 (95% CI: 0.193–0.221).

EC showed highly significant concentration-dependent increases ( P < 0.001).

Pre-harvest sprouting tolerance (PHST) based on SS and FN exhibited highly significant ( p < 0.001) phenotypic differences.

Statistically, the results were found to be highly significant (p < 0.001).

Correlation was highly significant (p<0.001 for all).