“highly significant”

Setup 3 showed highly significant electromagnetic interference during ablation with a SNR decrease by −60.4%±13.5% ( p < 0.001 ) compared to reference imaging.

Attrition Within Trajectory Groups Attrition during follow-up, defined as no valid year 6 uACR measurement ( Table 2 ), was highly significant by trajectory group ( P < .001).

When considering factor loadings and associated statistics for the best two-factor and three-factor models with sleep removed, all factor loadings were highly significant with t-value between 9.6 and 25.9 (minimum critical t value of 3.29 for P = 0.001) ( Table 4 ).

Response times The main effect of cue type was highly significant, with F (2, 68) = 116.79, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.77.

The difference was highly significant in every case for HRs ( p < 0.001) and in two of four cases for FARs.

For individuals with small IQ differences, we found small to medium relationships that were all highly significant (β = .29 for the IDS-2 FSIQ(7) and German to β = .52 for the RIAS ABIQ(2) and German, all with p < .001), and there were no significant differences in betas between the GICs.

The sex of the animal, location and agro-ecology were fitted as fixed effects in the model and had highly significant (p<0.001) effects for most body measurements.

The likelihood ratio tests of α for all predictors were all highly significant ( P < 0.001) implying that the variance in the data was higher than would be expected for a Poisson regression model.

The overall ratio of 66 positive to 18 negative test results was highly significant (binomial test, p < 0.001), and the individual ratios of two of the three birds were significant at the p < 0.05, and that of one at the p < 0.01 level.

Addition of the 3’UTR to the ChABC cDNA resulted in highly significant growth cone targeting (P<0.001, n = 106 growth cones) of the enzyme.

It was observed that 113 (50%) suspected stroke victims who met the activation criteria for the Stroke Code Protocol did not have the protocol activated, which had a highly significant influence ( p < 0.001) on door-to-CT time.

Although inferior to TE in determining significant hepatic fibrosis, RTE still showed a highly significant positive correlation with TE (P=0.001).

The consistent separation of curves across both time periods and all drug types, combined with highly significant log-rank test results (p<0.001 for all comparisons except famciclovir in period 2), provide strong evidence for a protective association between AHD use and AD treatment initiation ( online supplemental figures S1 and S2 ).

The Dunn’s post hoc test with Holm adjustment revealed that all direct comparisons between GD and VB materials within the same immersion medium were highly significant (mean ε 2 > 0.22, p < 0.001).

But when parents were able to pay for school meals, boys ( M = 85.2%) outperformed girls ( M = 78.9 %) and this difference was highly significant, F (1, 47) = 14.27, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.23.

There was a significant difference in sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score development between both groups within days 2 and 7, with highly significant differences on days 3, 4, and 6, respectively ( p < 0.001) (Fig. 1 A).

The p values in the graphs are indicated as follows: * p < 0.05 (significant), ** p < 0.01 (highly significant), and *** p < 0.001 (highly significant).

For the nDNA sequence data, pairwise estimates of F ST between populations ranged from 0.073 to 1 (mean = 0.712), and all comparisons were highly significant ( P < .001; Table S5 ).

Additionally, family history also showed a highly significant difference ( p = 0.001); (56.7%) of cases in the ASD group and (33.3%) of cases in ID group had positive family history of neurodevelopmental disorders in comparison to control group.

60% both at the lowest (16°C) and the highest (30°C) temperature, resulting in an inverted U‐shaped TPC (Figure 3 ); a pattern supported by the highly significant quadratic effect of temperature (χ 2 = 122.3, df = 1, p < .001).

The factorability of the data was confirmed by a high Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure (KMO = 0.84) and a highly significant Bartlett’s test of sphericity (χ2 = 11,447, p < .001), indicating sufficient intercorrelations among the variables.

All tumors <30 mm achieved complete resection, while piecemeal retrieval was required in 9.6% of 30–50 mm tumors and 89.5% of ≥50 mm tumors. Univariable Analysis In univariable analysis for piecemeal retrieval, both tumor dimensions were highly significant: longitudinal length (OR = 1.35 per 10 mm, 95% CI: 1.16–1.57, p < 0.001) and transverse length (OR = 1.53 per 10 mm, 95% CI: 1.29–1.81, p < 0.001).

The difference in increased activity engagement was highly significant at p < 0.001.

In our series, this cortical bone reaction, manifesting as a radiopaque, thickened canal wall, was seen in the majority of OM cases but in very few OSCC cases—a difference that was highly significant (χ2 = 79.4, P < 0.001).

PHMB, ET and BA decreased viability by 47.7%, 46% and 41.3% on average, also showing a highly significant difference from the control ( p < 0.001).