(1) Y = − 1278.9 + 92.39 X 1 + 408 X 2 − 0.7659 X 1 2 − 1115 X 2 2 + 4.98 X 1 X 2 The model was significant ( p < 0.05), with highly significant ( p < 0.001) X 1 , X 2 , and X 1 2 , adjusted R 2 = 0.9962, and predicted R 2 = 0.982 ( Supplementary Fig. 3A ).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
A Jonckheere–Terpstra test for ordered alternatives confirmed a highly significant monotonic increase across the four pre-specified ordered groups (standardized J–T statistic z = 7.896, p < 0.001).
The KMO value of 0.582 exceeded the minimum acceptable threshold, whereas Bartlett test of sphericity was highly significant (χ 2 = 917.76; P < 0.001), confirming adequate intercorrelations among variables.
These impressions were confirmed statistically, with a correlation analysis of the predicted and observed performance yielding highly significant effects both for the first-person perspective condition, r = .95, p<.001, and the third-person perspective condition, r = .94, p<.001.
The overall differences among the three methods were highly significant ( P < 0.001).
Bivariate analysis showed a highly significant difference between EndoUltra and XP Finisher ( p = 0.001) and between EndoUltra and Irriflex ( p = 0.001) respectively, EndoUltra inducing the highest reduction in TBC.
Pooled over groups, the heterogeneity was very highly significant (P < 0.001) in both sexes.
PDL was noticed in 73.3% of teeth in Group I and 62.5% of subjects in Group II and the findings were highly significant as compared to Group III ( P < 0.001).
The finding that individual HDI components modelled continuously were not significantly associated with mortality in unadjusted analyses, while fully adjusted continuous HDI was highly significant (OR 0.33; P < 0.001) and restricted cubic splines confirmed a significant overall association (χ2 = 24.7; P < 0.001), warrants careful interpretation.
The Tukey HSD multiple comparison test shows a highly significant difference between the number of edible mushrooms consumed by Ngando and other ethnic groups ( p value < 0.001).
Patients with advanced IAB demonstrated highly significant differences across all analyzed parameters ( p < 0.001).
The association between subvariant classification and caseness was highly significant, χ2(3) = 64.191, p <.001, Cramér’s V = .771, a large effect.
The mean NT-proBNP level in the severe group was 6,920 ± 2,310 pg/mL, whereas it was 3,240 ± 1,580 pg/mL in the mild to moderate group, demonstrating a highly significant difference (p < 0.001) (Table 2 ).
A highly significant difference was present if p ≤ 0.001.
Crucially, the BLRT for the four-class model was highly significant (P < 0.001), providing the gold-standard statistical justification for its retention over a three-class solution.
PERMANOVA on ‘dynamisms’ (main effects and pairwise tests) Main effect and pairwise test The three-way PERMANOVA (excluding ‘shame’ and ‘guilt’) revealed highly significant main effects for ‘dynamism’ (Pseudo- F = 15.53, p = 0.001), ‘Location’ (Pseudo- F = 4.52, p = 0.001), and ‘Time’ (Pseudo- F = 18.07, p = 0.001) ( Supplementary Table S6a ).
Highly significant gene expression levels of TP53, PTGS1 , and VEGFA in GB tissue can be observed ( p -value of < 0.001, Fig. 3 A, C, and E).
There was also a very highly significant difference between the two measurement periods ( p < 0.001).
Among them, the differences in C14:0, C16:0, C17:0, C18:1n-9, C18:2n-6, and C18:3n-3 between male and female ducks were highly significant ( P < 0.001).
Interobserver variation The intraclass correlation coefficient was highly significant (0.935, p<0.001).
Fisher's exact test indicated a highly significant difference in the distribution of bacterial isolates between diseased and healthy tomato fruits ( p < 0.001), demonstrating complete ecological niche separation with no shared species between fruit health states (0% overlap).
Aversely, basal serum Se concentrations of SPG were lower than CG; being this diminution highly significant ( p < 0.001).
Once the two subgroups in TPV were formed, the relationship between TPV and GVPZ was found to be highly significant (p<0.001).
Also, a highly significant linear relationship was found between root rot severity and biomass reduction especially for F . avenaceum (R 2 = 0.91, P < 0.001).
During the late phase, a highly significant effect was observed for the aqueous extract, which significantly exceeded that of the reference molecule, morphine ( p < 0.001) (Figure 6 ).