“highly significant”

The overall adjusted R 2 of this model was highly significant (P < 0.001) and equal to 0.35.

As expected, the correlation with global disability outcomes was weaker, but still highly significant (e.g., ρ 0.46–0.65; p < 0.001 for EDSS).

No overall effect of talker was found ( F (1,59) = 0.7, p = 0.400), but there were highly significant effects of SNR ( F (2,118) = 992.9, p < 0.001), noise reduction method ( F (3,177) = 2077.3, p < 0.001), and noise type ( F (1,59) = 692.4, p < 0.001).

Furthermore, the box plot showed a highly significant difference in the mean expression levels of RBMS3 between NPC tumors and non-tumor samples (p<0.001; Fig. 1B ).

Dynamic Balance Training Dynamic balance training over 4weeks induced a highly significant TIME effect ( Figure 3 ), more precisely an increase in training scores ( F 5.161, ∞ =92.141, p <0.001), but no significant GROUP effect was observed ( F 1.000, ∞ =1.188, p =0.278).

The intergroup comparison of the mean time taken to extract the teeth elicited a statistically highly significant difference (P < 0.001), which was preserved even when the time taken for gingival retraction in the conventional group was not taken into consideration ( Table 1 ). 2.

Diazepam, the positive control, showed highly significant effects ( p < 0.001) throughout the test (Table 4 , Figure 6 ). 3.4.2.

It is noteworthy that this correlation was not due to an outlier, as it remained highly significant ( p = 0.001) when excluding the unique subject with both LANG and VAN strong atypical lateralization.

Correlation between right and left-side rSO 2 baseline values was strong and highly significant (r=0.85, p<0.001).

Next, Spearman's rank correlation analysis confirmed a positive and highly significant correlation between CLIP170 expression and both TNM stage ( P < 0.001) and pathological stage ( P < 0.001; Fig. 1 D).

This model had little explanatory power and a poor fit, as is common for bivariate logistic regression (McFadden’s Pseudo R 2 0.039, AUC 0.697, and a highly significant Hoslem’s test p<0.001).

The differences in infection prevalence across the eight age groups were highly significant ( p <0.001).

Moreover, the decrease of bisecting GlcNAc structures in cancer cells was found to be highly significant ( p < 0.001), which is in line with the fact that these types of structures are the main discriminators in the multivariate statistical analysis.

In our study, we found a highly significant (p<0.001) decrease in the P300 wave latency post-exercise.

Although the mRNA level of ALAS1 in liver was less in +/− than WT this was statistically only just significant ( p 0.049) whereas the difference in brain was highly significant ( p < 0.001) ( Fig. 5 D).

There were highly significant mean reductions in the scores in all domains of IBS-SSS: pain severity scores (pre-GFH 61 vs 26 post-GFH, p<0.001), pain frequency scores (pre-GFH 61 vs 31 post-GFH, p<0.001), abdominal bloating severity (pre-GFH 51 vs 26 post-GFH, p<0.0001), dissatisfaction with bowel habit (pre-GFH 63 vs 33 post-GFH, p<0.0001) and interference with life (pre-GFH 76 vs 39 post-GFH, p<0.0001).

Statistical analysis confirmed a highly significant difference among pesticide categories (P < 0.001), suggesting that fungicides pose the highest risk of exceeding MRLs in fruit samples during the study period.

The full model was highly significant (F 12.612 = 28.565, p < 0.001; with an R 2 = 0.36).

The former was large, negative and highly significant ( F s = −26.244, P <0.001), showing the occurrence of a larger than expected number of singleton mutations, as expected for populations that underwent a population expansion.

The model was highly significant ( p < 0.001), indicating that the equation was sufficient to predict production under any combination of variable values.

The analysis of the ratings of the positive-negative IAPS pictures yielded the expected, highly significant main effect of valence, F(1,198) = 897.53, p < .001, confirming that positive pictures were liked better than negative pictures (5.9 vs. 2.4), while the main effect of key mapping and the interaction were far from significant, ps > .2.

Moreover, the chi-square test results showed a highly significant association between the intervention and changes in risk levels (χ2 = 28.214, df = 2, p < 0.001), supporting the effectiveness of the intervention as given in Table 6 .

Compared with 0 h, the viable counts of KLK29 (0–3 h: 8.09–7.41 l g CFU/mL) exhibited a highly significant decreasing trend ( p < 0.001 ).

The expression levels of ENO3 , FABP4 , FADS2 , FAT1 , and ITIH3 in the MAFLD dataset showed very highly significant differences among the different groups ( p < 0.001).

A highly significant difference ( P <0.001) was observed between the Gold alloy and the two other groups.