“highly significant”

The results revealed a highly significant positive correlation ( P < 0.001, R 2 = 0.9994) between the translation intensity of cistron 1 and that of cistron 2 (Fig. 3A ), indicating that the translation of cistron 2 strictly depends on cistron 1 translation.

Statistical validation showed that the model was highly significant ( p < 0.001), with no significant lack of fit ( p = 0.7073).

The chi-square test of independence revealed a highly significant association between Ct value and RT-RAA assay sensitivity (p-value < 0.001).

A highly significant genetic break between archipelagos following isolation by distance was detected ( F ST = 0.369, p < .001).

Spatial autocorrelation in PBBA II block occupancy data was highly significant (Z‐test, p ‐value < .001) for all six study species (Global Moran's I, mean = 0.33; Table 1 ).

However, the median motivation score of using SNSs in relation to weight loss/dieting, fitness/exercise, cooking, fashion, and bariatric surgery was highly significant in the DEBs-risk group ( p < 0.001).

Specifically, WISP2 showed highly significant expression differences ( p value < 0.001), while MELK and SDF2L1 showed substantial statistical significance ( p value < 0.01).

However the effect size was much smaller than the highly significant influence of mask type ( χ 2 (1) = 68.85, p < 0.001).

Both coefficients were statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001).

A highly significant association was found between insomnia and neuropathic pain ( p < 0.001).

An Adonis test confirmed highly significant differences among cultivars (R 2 = 0.999, p = 0.001).

Equivalent results were observed for protein expression where a highly significant increase in PSMA expression in LNCaP (1.25 ± 0.05, p < 0.001) and C4‐2 (1.26 ± 0.02, p < 0.007) was revealed (Figure 5 (b)).

The BiPorto NGAL Test has also been shown to display a highly significant agreement with the current reference chemiluminescent immunoassay (Abbott Architect NGAL; Abbott Diagnostics, Lake Forest, IL, USA) (r=0.925; p<0.001) [18] . 2.4 Statistics and ethical approval The linearity of the Gentian NGAL assay was tested by calculation of Spearman's correlation coefficient (r) and using Passing and Bablok regression analysis.

For the Chi-squared test, the results are considered significant when p (degree of significance) is less than 0.05, very significant when p < 0.01 and highly significant when p < 0.001.

The association between prior diagnosis and current BP category was highly significant (χ 2 = 650.507, df = 2, p < 0.001). 3.3.

All these effects were highly significant ( P = .001).

The total score and subscale score of CPCTDS had a highly significant positive correlation with the THI-25 total score ( rs = 0. 960, r = 0.956, P < 0.001) and its subscale scores, i.e., functional ( rs = 0.902, r = 0.839, P < 0.001), emotional ( rs = 0.949, r = 0.945, P < 0.001), and catastrophic ( rs = 0.863, r = 0.870, P < 0.001).[ 21 22 ] The correlation of the CPCTDS emotional subscale with the TFI emotional subscale ( r = 0.650, P < 0.05), CES-D ( r = 0.488, P < 0.05) and BAI ( r = 0.384, P < 0.05) showed that the convergent validity of CPCTDS was satisfactory.

Similarly, a highly significant association ( p < 0.001) was detected between TEs and genes encoding candidate secreted effector proteins.

Most of items showed positive, and moderate correlation, while other items showed weak correlation, with the overall performance ranging from r = > 0.22–0.65 with highly significant p value ( p < 0.001).

The overall comparison was found to be statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001) (Table 1 ).

The two-way ANOVA showed that ZnO NPs concentration had a highly significant effect on hemoglobin release (F = 35.365, p < 0.001), whereas exposure time and the concentration × time interaction were not significant.

The highest correlations are seen with the physician Visual Analog Scale ( r = 0.984) and Global Visual Analog Scale ( r = 0.981), both highly significant ( P < 0.001).

Comparing the mean anxiety scores between the components, Friedman Test revealed highly significant (chi sq = 823.5, p < 0.001) difference among the scores of various anxiety components.

For all the assessed items and criteria, highly significant ICCs were observed between checklist and interview (all P <0.001).

The percentage of the extract at the lowest dose (200 mg/kg) was comparable with that of Coartem, although Coartem exhibited a highly significant ( P < .001) decrease in percentage parasitemia compared with negative control and 800 mg/kg.