“highly significant”

Age was found to be statistically highly significant (χ2 = 22.05; p = 0.001) with anxiety.

* P < 0.05, significant difference; ** P < 0.01, highly significant difference; *** P < 0.001, extremely significant difference.

There was a statistically significant difference in teeth wear in the prescan and postscan in the natural tooth ( p < 0.05) group, highly significant difference ( p < 0.001) in the ZR group, and no significant difference in the GFRC group.

A highly significant correlation between the resected weights and the implant volumes (correlation coefficient 0.744; p < 0.001) was observed.

A highly significant main effect of recognition accuracy was found, F (1, 70) = 82.41, p < 0.001, partial η 2 = 0.54, reflecting faster responses for correct ( M = 2367, SD = 273.3) versus incorrect recognition ( M = 2698, SD = 423.8).

In line this view, a repeated-measures ANOVA on reaction time during noTMS trials with task (detection, angle judgment), TMS type (sham, real), and context (interleaved, blocked) as within subject factors revealed a highly significant effect of context ( F (1,13) = 59.940, p < .001) and an effect of task ( F (1,13) = 379.706, p < .001) due to differences in task difficulty.

At n = 713, all absolute correlations of |R|>0.1 are highly significant with p<0.001.

‘*’ represents P<0.05 (significant), ‘**’ represents P<0.01 (highly significant), and ‘***’ represents P<0.001 (very highly significant).

The contribution of the Arginine pathway was further confirmed by pathway analysis, conducted with Metaboanalyst 27 , which indicated “Arginine biosynthesis” as highly significant (p < 0.001). “Aminoacyl-tRNA metabolism” (p < 0.001), “Histidine metabolism” (p = 0.005), and “Alanine, Aspartate and Glutamate metabolism” (p = 0.026) were also indicated as significant pathways.

This improvement was also statistically highly significant ( P < 0.001) [ Table 4 ].

Statistical comparison using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test demonstrated a highly significant improvement in Stamey scores for the entire cohort ( p < 0.001).

Moreover, the fraction of tumoral dendritic cells component was significantly (highly significant in dendritic cells resting (HR = 0.4 (0.23–0.69), p < 0.001) and marginally significant in dendritic cells activated (HR = 0.56 (0.30–1.04), p value = 0.067)) and positively associated with poor prognosis, suggesting a deleterious effect on clinical outcome, whereas a totally opposite beneficial effect was observed in peritumor samples (dendritic cells resting [HR = 1.97 (1.27–3.06), p value = 0.003]; dendritic cells activated [HR = 2.92 (1.07–7.98), p value = 0.037]) ( Figure 5 B).

Differences with p < 0.05 are considered statistically significant, differences with p < 0.01 are considered highly significant, and differences with p < 0.001 are considered extremely significant.

Only household transmission could reasonably be described by the Poisson distribution (chi-squared goodness of fit statistic 2.21 on 4 d.f.), with all the other settings showing highly significant departures from Poisson variation ( p -values < 0.001).

There were highly significant changes across the MBI scores with the WHOQOL-BREF domains (p<0.001).

Overall, a highly significant effect of the extraction method on the extractive yields was observed ( p < 0.001).

The ANOVA showed a highly significant and strong effect of time [ F (3.85, 161.7) = 155.9, p < 0.001, η g 2 = 0.554].

There was a highly significant increase in knowledge and skills from T0 to T1 in both groups for all items (all p < 0.001).

Notably, heterogeneity was highly significant ( I 2 =95.4%, p <.001; Q(53) =1160.76, p <.001) and subgroup and meta-regression analyses need to be used to assess significant influences contributing to the observed heterogeneity.

Yield results showed that all three main effects (hybrids, stand densities, and environments) were highly significant ( p < 0.001), and that the interactions hybrid × stand density and hybrid × environment were also statistically significant for yield ( p < 0.05; Table 4 ).

The linear regression model was also highly significant, and presented a high value of coefficient of determination ( R 2 = 0.93, F = 124.08, p = 0.001).

The difference in the correlation coefficients was highly significant ( p < 0.001): the statistical significance was confirmed and validated with Fisher’s z transformation test ( p < 0.001). 4.

Improvement of patient satisfaction, partner's satisfaction, and number of penile thrusts were statistically highly significant ( P < 0.001).

The therapy showed highly significant ( P < 0.001) beneficial effect on the clinical features of Sandhigatavata .

Result Group A showed highly significant results ( P < 0.001) in standing, fine motor skills, language functions, head-holding and personal and social activities, whereas significant results ( P < 0.05) were achieved in the sitting parameter.