“highly significant”

Results Comparison of the survival proportions between treated and control groups showed that fluralaner insecticidal efficacy was highly significant in both trials ( P < 0.001 or P < 0.01 in different assessments) through to day 56.

The difference in rate of success between the dimeticone and permethrin groups was estimated as 54.9% (95% CI of 35% to 75%) (OR 13.19, 95% CI 4.69 to 37.07) which meant that there was a highly significant (p < 0.001) superiority of dimeticone liquid gel compared with permethrin creme rinse in the population tested.

However, this should be interpreted with caution because of the small number of twin pregnancies (n=9; 0.7%), which gives rise to a very large 95% CI of the OR (3.514 - 72.105), even though the p-value was highly significant (p<0.001).

29.9% among HCV-infected) was highly significant ( p < 0.001), and, conversely, the relative frequency of samples positive for anti-HBc was only significantly higher in patients with HCV than in patients with HIV (35% vs. 21%; p < 0.005).

The overall association was highly significant ( p < 0.001), with a notable p -value for non-linearity at 0.002, suggesting a complex relationship rather than a simple linear trend.

The statistical methods were checked assuming a significance level of p<0.05 and a highly significant level of p<0.001.

According to bivariate categorical analysis, six highly significant (p<0.001) animal- and farm-level risk factors for sheep were age, breed, number of lambings, history of abortion, rural farms, and presence of dogs on the farm.

The differences in the incidence of all AEs were highly significant between the two groups (p<0.001, online supplementary table S3; figure 3 ).

The resulting OR was somewhat smaller (OR=2.47, 95% CI 1.45 to 4.22), though still highly significant (p<0.001), and the corresponding NNT was 6 (95% CI 4 to 15).

The difference was even more pronounced for women, 253±73 mg for MDRD4 compared with 186±105 mg for CG old (+36%) and less for men, 267±77 mg for MDRD4 compared with 234±94 mg for CG old (+14%), but still highly significant (p<0.001).

In the first 15 months of the study, there were an average of 2.5 staff changes in the US compared to an average of 1.1 staff changes in Finland and 0.3 staff changes in Sweden (mothers’ data), a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001 both for mothers and fathers).

Lastly, investigation of the relationship between eDNA‐based frequency of detection and net‐based species abundance revealed highly significant associations for both flower eDNA (Figure 5A : p < 0.001) and leaf surface eDNA (Figure 5B : p = 0.008) samples. 4.

Here, the Wilcoxon signed‐rank test again manifested a highly significant discrepancy between the groups, which was characterized by a p ‐value of <0.001.

The type of solvent and nHA percentages were two different independent variables, and differences considered statistically significant in p < 0.05, very significant in p < 0.01, and highly significant in p < 0.001.

The equation was highly significant [ F (7,95) = 16.53, p < 0.001], representing a large effect size, f 2 = 1.14.

[ 36 ] identified a highly significant level of chance-corrected agreement between SDQ prediction and an independent clinical diagnosis (Kendall’s tau b between 0.49 and 0.73; p < 0.001). “Emotional symptoms” is one of 5 subscales and consists of 5 items ((1)“Often complaints of headaches, stomach-aches or sickness”, (2) “Many worries, often seems worried”, (3) “Often unhappy, down-hearted or tearful”, (4) “Nervous or clingy in new situations, easily loses confidence, (5) “Many fears, easily scared”) with 3 response options (“not true” (scored as 0), “somewhat true” (scored as 1), “certainly true” (scored as 2)).

pratense ), with a subset of these being highly significant ( p < 0.001).

It can be reported that the electrical resistance was influenced by cyclic straining, which was highly significant at α = 0.05 level-value for the slope and intercept ( p -value < 0.001) (statistically significant).

Nevertheless, the combined effect of the predictors on the independent variables was highly significant (η 2 = 0.883; p < 0.001), and thus the null hypothesis of the investigation can be rejected.

T-tests revealed that the differences in the absolute relative errors were highly significant; specifically, the psychiatric patients misestimated timespans, whereas the healthy control subjects produced rather accurate time estimates ( t (152) = 3.28, p = .001).

The ILD test revealed highly significant (P<0.001) incongruence in phylogenetic structure between the largely nuclear ISSR data and the plastid sequence data.

It is notable that the interaction between light and hydrogen peroxide addition (LW*H 2 O 2 , LB*H 2 O 2 ), resulted highly significant ( p < 0.001) for all the analytical indexes.

No significant difference was detected between the effective MNP coverage and anaemia prevalence ( Figure 1 A), but the differences between deworming and anaemia prevalence and between the MNP + Deworming condition and anaemia prevalence ( Figure 1 B,C) were highly significant ( p < 0.001).

In contrast, patients without graft loss experienced a highly significant drop of absolute viremia between baseline and months 3 ( p < 0.001), 6 ( p < 0.001), and 12 ( p < 0.001).

For ten of these genes ( acana , bicc2 , cldn24 , c och , csf1r1 , fzd9b , kcnk3a , melA , pax7a , and scarb1 ), highly significant differential expression was detected in red spots compared with black spots and background colour regions (p < 0.001).