“highly significant”

Separate analyses, performed on different diagnostic groups, revealed an important and highly significant reduction (−55%) in admission rates for affective disorders ( p < 0.001); on the other hand, the decrease in admission rates observed for schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD), personality disorders, and substance use disorders did not reach statistical significance (possibly because the sample size for these diagnoses was not large enough).

indica showed highly significant association with soil type ( χ 2 (10, N = 478) = 103.2, p < 0.001).

A highly significant statistical difference existed between the 2 groups in relation to the acceptance of color ( P < 0.001) and child's satisfaction ( P < 0.001).

The effect of hip status at screening was highly significant ( P < 0.001) for both life and veterinary claims related to HD in all five breeds with an increased hazard ratio (HR) for deteriorating hip status being graded 2–4 [up to year 2000 or later D–E (moderate–severe HD)] as compared with 0 and 1 [up to year 2000 or later A–C (normal hip joints–mild dysplasia)].

Given that highly significant correlations ( r = .69, p < .001) and similar results for the bilateral putamen were found, we used the average rGMD of the bilateral putamen in subsequent analyses. 3.2.

The prognostic score combining these two factors is highly significant ( p = 0.001) (Fig. 2 ).

In contrast, obesity (BMI: 27.5-37.5 kg/m 2 ) was even more prevalent among 68 (52%) female cases in comparison to 6 (12%) female controls, and frequency distribution of BMI was highly significant ( p < 0.001) among them.

Confirmatory analyses The ANOVA revealed a highly significant effect of age-group, F (1, 95) = 11.08, p = 0.001, η 2 = 0.10, indicating that older children engaged in more helping behavior than younger children.

* Indicates significant differences ( p ≤ 0.05), ** indicates very significant differences ( p ≤ 0.01), and *** indicates highly significant differences ( p ≤ 0.001) compared with the negative control (lymphocytes without treatment), while § indicates significant differences ( p ≤ 0.05) compared with the positive control (sodium arsenite).

Table 4 unveils the comparative assessment of the before and after training mean oral health knowledge scores of school teachers, and it was found that the increase in knowledge of teachers was highly significant ( P = 0.001).

The results were considered statistically significant when P < 0.05* and highly significant when P < 0.001***.

Low (0.35 < r < 0.38) but highly significant ( p < 0.001) correlations exist between the results of the qualitative scale and the quantitative parameters: maximum support surface area, time spent in the abdomen (static and dynamic periods), weight distribution on left limbs (static periods).

Similarly, germination rates presented highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) between germplasm groups with 80%, 63%, and 59% average germination for commercial cultivars, landraces and genebank accessions, respectively ( Table 2 ).

In addition, there was a significant decrease in GCF/MMP-8 levels after 30 days in patients managed by SRP only ( p = 0.017) compared with the baseline in both groups, whereas a highly significant decrease in patients treated by SRP and probiotics ( p = 0.001).

There is a much less striking pattern for barriers with men reporting slightly more barriers both in addiction and in recovery and with no gender difference in the reduction in recovery barriers in the time in between. The final analysis attempted to predict the total number of recovery assets in recovery using the following factors as independent variables: age, gender, length of recovery, age of first drug use, age of last drug use, recovery strengths in active addiction, recovery barriers in active addiction and recovery barriers in recovery The final model was highly significant (F = 28.58, p < 0.001), predicting 31.8% of the variance of recovery strengths for individuals in recovery, with only age of first use as a non-significant predictor in the final model (see Table 7 ).

Differences were highly significant ( p < 0.001, one-way ANOVA).

Moreover, there was a highly significant difference in NiTi-K flex files in reciprocating motion compared with Kedo-S rotary files ( p = 0.001) at 6-hour interval.

The effect was highly significant, M r = .37, Z = 3.26, p < .001, two-tailed, showing that men evaluated the scent of sexually aroused women as more attractive than non-sexually aroused women across all three experiments (see Table 1 ).

Pharmacists The results from the pharmacist group indicated a highly significant difference between OCMIS for SUS scores ( P <.001) and task completion times ( P =.007).

Positive Cyclin D1 was highly significant with PC (P value < 0.001) (Fig. 1 ).

For glucose yield, however, the interaction term between mass loss and decay type was highly significant ( P < 0.001), though the main effect of decay type was not significant ( P = 0.547).

The difference between the two TEGDMA groups was highly significant ( P ≤0.001).

A highly significant difference was found between both groups regarding fasting blood sugar (P < 0.001), lipid profile (P < 0.001) and hormonal assay (P < 0.001).

The improvement mean in experimental group was 7.63 with SD 1.07 and t value 19.430 which was highly significant at p< 0.001 Conclusion: Milk secretion among caesarean mothers was enhanced after administering reflexology.

Feedback recipients, in contrast, showed a highly significant Outcomes x Timing interaction, F (1, 116) = 19.6, p < .001, η 2 = .14.