“highly significant”

muscari As shown in Figure 3 , there was a highly significant ( p < 0.001) quadratic relationship between nitrogen application rate and photosynthetic performance of L. muscari leaves.

For the presence-ratings from 1 to 100, the factor “Soundscape” was highly significant, F (1, 35) = 48.95, p < 0.001, with a large effect size (η 2 = 0.583), while the factor “Steps” had no significant effect, F (1, 35) = 0.003, p = 0.96, nor did their interaction, F (1, 35) = 0.531, p = 0.471.

Intraprocedural effects of cryo-PVI on heart rate When comparing heart rate at baseline versus one day after PVI a highly significant rate increase was observed (16.5 ± 1.6%; p < 0.001; n = 91 patients), which corresponded to an absolute acceleration of rate by 9.8 ± 0.9 beats/min.

The most striking shift concerned IL-6, whose mean fell by 778 pg mL −1 (37.6%) with ECMO yet only 248 pg mL −1 (12.5%) in controls, delivering a highly significant inter-group difference ( p < 0.001).

The regression was highly significant ( y = 1.24 + 0.62 x , R 2 = 0.9660, p < 0.001).

The model showed a highly significant likelihood ratio test ( p < 0.001). 4.

It is peculiar why the AOR for female compared to male was less than 1 (AOR=0.569) and highly significant (p <.001). c.

Data were visualized using GraphPad Prism 7.0 statistical software, with p < 0.05 indicating a statistically significant difference, p < 0.01 indicating a highly significant difference, and p < 0.001 indicating an extremely significant difference.

The 2024 cohort (Group 2) exhibited a significantly higher proportion of affected permanent teeth, at 29.6%, compared to only 6.8% in the 2020 cohort (Group 1), a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001), as shown in Table 3 .

Significance levels were denoted as follows: P < 0.05 indicates significant differences, P < 0.01 denotes highly significant differences, while P < 0.001 signifies extremely significant differences, and P > 0.05 suggests a lack of significant differences.

However, the main effect of image category was highly significant ( F [1, 76] = 158.38, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.67), and the interaction of age group and image category was also significant ( F [3, 76] = 3.19, p = 0.028, η 2 = 0.11).

The classification obtained was validated by an analysis of variance for hypothesis testing, which was highly significant ( p < 0.001), confirming the existence of statistical differences among the defined biotypes ( Figure 2 ).

The difference in mean POGO scores during final laryngoscopy between two groups was statistically highly significant ( P < 0.001).

Group differences in neurocognitive function The MANOVA on group differences in neurocognitive function was highly significant for Group (F(16,176) = 3.78, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.256).

There was a highly significant difference in the redness of KNP and LYD ( p < 0.001), with KNP showing significantly higher redness (10.40) than that of LYD (6.43).

Index values and mortality For both species, insecticide and exposure time were highly significant ( p < 0.001), while concentration was marginally significant for T. castaneum ( p = 0.036) and non-significant for T. confusum ( p = 0.161).

Similarly, the data in Table 3 showed highly significant differences (P < 0.001) among the four study groups for the right-side LCG values.

When the presence of metabolic syndrome was considered in the multivariate analysis, the latter had a highly significant independent effect (p = 0.001) with an OR of 2.55 (95% CI 1.61–4.90).

Both crossing types, w + FF x w + MM and w + FF x w − MM were compared with a t-test (unpaired), and highly significant differences were observed, p < 0.001.

Since there was a highly significant difference in prevalence of D. repens between sled dogs (four-fold higher) and other dogs (mainly pets; dog status × D. repens infection: χ 2 1 = 23.0, P < 0.001; Table 1 ), this also contributed to the lower overall prevalence in 2019.

The slope of the regression line from these experiments with medium-sized females was used to estimate the increase in frequency for every increase in 1°C as 8–13 Hz. Group Flights Temperature remained a highly significant factor for female flight tone in the group recording experiments ( Fig. 4 ; LMM: F = 325.47; df = 1, 35; P < 0.001).

The association between mother/mother’s substitute and malnutrition was statistically highly significant ( P < 0.001).

A chi-square test revealed a highly significant performance difference between negated and non-negated reports for BERT (χ2 ≈ 300.46, p < 0.001), suggesting that the BERT model is particularly sensitive to negation.

When using multivariate regression analysis to adjust for the confounding factors maternal age, mode of birth, gestational age, birth weight and sex of the child, ATG4C assay 1 revealed a small but highly significant hypermethylation in both the ICSI ( P < 0.001) and IVF group ( P = 0.002), compared to controls (see Supplementary data, Table SII ).

Statistical significance was set as follows: * p < 0.05 indicates significant difference, ** p < 0.01 indicates highly significant difference, *** p < 0.001 indicates highly significant difference; when p > 0.05, it was labeled as n.s., which indicated that the difference between groups was not statistically significant. 3.