“highly significant”

There was also a highly significant association of rising risk with increasing degree of adiposity from age 11 to 20 (OR 1.19 [1.09‐1.30]; P < .001; see Section 2 ).

The median time spent on the general instructions page was also 3.0 sec, and the relationship between time spent on the instructions and the time spent on the prompt page was highly significant ( p <0.001), making time spent on the instructions page a good variable to control for potential differences that may exist in participants who spend more or less time reading text.

Publication bias was evident with a highly significant small-study effect in Egger’s test ( P < 0.001) and borderline significance in Begg’s tests ( P = 0.098).

Dimensions and internal reliability of CTDQ We found a 4-factor model with a Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure of sampling adequacy of 0.789 and a highly significant Bartlett test of sphericity (p < 0.001).

Statistical analyses (ANOVA) indicated that site, soil type, and their interactions all had highly significant main and interaction effects on Cr, Fe, Mn, and Ni concentrations (p < 0.001) (Table 2 ).

The observed difference was also highly significant (Tukey’s Multiple Comparison Test (TMCT), p < 0.001) in 2-day old nematodes (Figure 3 C).

The probability of a blenny switching to another species after being punished varied between 14.1%–71.4%, yielding overall highly significant differences between individuals (Chi 2 test, n = 560 observations on 6 blennies, Chi 2 = 227.8, df = 5, p<0.001, fig. 3 ).

Statistical significance thresholds were defined as follows: P<0.05 indicates a statistically significant difference, P<0.01 denotes highly significant differences, P<0.001 signifies extremely significant differences, while P>0.05 (marked as ns) indicates no statistically significant difference.

1 G revealed a highly significant positive correlation ( p < 0.001) between TPC, TFC and FRAP, ABTS + free radical scavenging activity in all three onion varieties, with the correlation coefficient exceeding 0.85; in contrast, SASC and DPPH free radical scavenging activity presented a significant positive correlation ( p < 0.05) independent of the above indices.

The regression model was highly significant, F (8, 71) = 27.697, p < .001, explaining 75.7% of the variance in post-intervention ESAS scores ( R 2 = .757).

Analysis of variance for particle size ( Table 4 ) demonstrated that the quadratic model was highly significant ( F = 42.18, p < 0.001) with an excellent coefficient of determination ( R 2 = 0.9870), indicating that 98.7% of the variability in particle size can be explained by the model.

Furthermore, X 1 , X 2 , X 3 , X 1 2 , X 2 2 , and X 3 2 were highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Overall motor proficiency demonstrated a highly significant improvement ( F (1) = 16.40, p = 0.001, η 2 p = 0.43).

(2024) found early-stage CRC patients had a mean serum Se concentration of ~ 67.2 μg/L versus ~ 78.8 μg/L in non-cancer surgery patients, a highly significant difference ( P < 0.001) [ 16 ].

The root-to-shoot ratio increased under stress, indicating an increased partitioning of biomass towards root as an adaptive mechanism. Genetic variation of traits under water stress and recovery conditions In Table 1 , the analysis of variance showed that there was highly significant variation ( P < 0.001) among the genotypes for all the traits under stress conditions.

For individuals with small IQ differences, we found small to medium relationships that were all highly significant (β = .29 for the IDS-2 FSIQ(7) and German to β = .52 for the RIAS ABIQ(2) and German, all with p < .001), and there were no significant differences in betas between the GICs.

Based on the highly significant difference in the coverage index ( p = 0.001), group H had a higher OTU richness than group D.

Among these tested gene pairs, the closely linked genes BnFRI.A3 and BnFLC.A3b showed a highly significant correlation (Pearson’s correlation coefficient, r = 0.965, P <0.001) in relative expression levels from the cotyledon stage to the flowering stage in nonvernalized Ningyou7.

After treatment, however, highly significant differences emerged ( p < 0.001).

Hub Gene Expression Pattern In the validation population, RFI in the high feed efficiency group ranged from −0.089 to −0.004 g/d (mean: −0.017 g/d), while that in the low feed efficiency group ranged from 0.006 to 0.034 g/d (mean: 0.017 g/d), showing a highly significant difference between the two groups ( p < 0.001).

The residual gender effect remained highly significant for generalized anxiety symptom (adjusted β = 0.18, p < 0.001) and depressive symptom scores (β = 0.09, p < 0.001) but no longer reached statistical significance for emotional/behavioral scores (β = 0.04, p = 0.078).

Results of the Kaplan–Meier survival analysis demonstrated highly significant differences in survival rates among the different challenge groups (log-rank p < 0.001).

Nutritional quality indices calculated in SAT revealed highly significant seasonal effects ( p < 0.001).

For family self-concept, a highly significant effect emerged, with F (3, 718) = 66.79, p < 0.001.

Statistical analysis revealed that the effect of the dose was highly significant ( p <0.001).