“highly significant”

Analysis of variance revealed that latitudinal gradient had a highly significant effect on mean densities of adult (F = 18.78, p < 0.001) and juvenile (F = 7.20, p < 0.001) individuals, mean diameter (F = 81.16, p < 0.001) and Lorey's mean height (F = 28.13, p < 0.001) of L. macrocarpa ( Table 4 ).

Student's t -test was used for the statistical analysis, and a value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant (*), P < 0.01 as highly significant (**) and P < 0.001 as extremely significant (***). 3.

Referring to the order of components reported in Table 4 , the absolute values of R were highly significant ( p < 0.001); for four components, R was >0.9 ( p < 0.001), for the 4th component (related to memory) R = 0.86 ( p < 0.001) and for the 6th component (orientation) R = 0.66 ( p = 0.011).

However, the model χ 2 test was highly significant ( χ 2 [149] = 263.66, p < 0.001), and as such, modification indices (MIs) were examined to determine possible sources of model misspecification.

Most differences between normal and tumor groups were statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001 ), as indicated by solid colored links.

The results from the analysis of variance showed a highly significant difference (p < 0.001) among almost all the traits studied.

Connection Sparsity for Network Analyses The final functional networks were thresholded at a sparsity of 0.2, in which the discriminative ability for PD classification reached the highest accuracy of 88.7% ( Table 2 ) and was highly significant at p = 0.001.

There was highly significant positive correlation between both TNF-α and eosinophil % after PT ( r = 0.545, P value < 0.001).

The increase in total monocytes in women with prior hypertension was highly significant compared to non-pregnant controls ( P < 0.001) and trended towards significance compared to the pregnant women without hypertension ( P = 0.053).

Results Digitizing error The ANOVAs for centroid size and shape for skull and lower jaws both indicate that the “Individual-by-Side” (FA) interaction is highly significant ( P < 0.001), which means that the smallest biological variation that can be measured here greatly exceeds the measurement error due to “Digitizing” ( Supplementary Table 2 ).

Cognitive function among the participants Assessment of cognitive function showed that the mean total MoCA score for the diabetic subjects (21.7 ± 5.6) was lower than that of the non-diabetic controls (26.5 ± 2.1), and the difference was highly significant ( P = 0.001).

For the majority of the strategies, there was no association, but for those which were significant, the correlation was strong (0.4–0.6) and highly significant ( p < 0.001).

For all patients, the dynamic study highlighted a highly significant positive correlation between changes in lung and oropharyngeal microbiota for diversity (r = 0.87 (0.42;1), p < 0.001), for relative abundance of Bacilli (r = 0.91 (0.77;1), p < 0.001) and for relative abundance of Bacteroidia (r = 0.99 (0.94;1), p < 0.001).

We found a strong positive correlation between direct ICP and ONSD after intubation with correlation coefficient of 0.969 and which was statistically highly significant with P-value <0.001.

All questionnaire subscales showed a highly significant clinical improvement from baseline to short- and long-term follow-up ( p < 0.001).

The Young’s modulus values were less dispersed in late-mature enamel ( Figure 4E ) than in early maturation ( Figure 4D ), with a highly significant difference for more mineralized late-mature enamel ( p < 0.001 ) of DEHP-treated mice.

The correlation of stem diameter in the three seasons was between 0.84 and 0.86, showing a highly significant correlation ( p < 0.001) ( Figure 1 a,b).

Our results also demonstrated significant relationships for the control variables of cattle and crop density (p<0.01) and highly significant relationships (p<0.001) for lagged deforestation, time period fixed effects, and the spatial autocorrelation coefficient (Rho).

However, highly significant ORs (e.g., p < 0.001) were expected.

The interaction between the two factors was also highly significant (F = 14.7, df = 12, p < 0.001), indicating that photoperiodic effects on the rate of nymphal development substantially differed among the studied populations.

Although there was no significant difference in the animals’ body weight between SML-treated or SML-ANPs-treated animals during the first two weeks, the difference after the third week was highly significant ( p value < 0.001).

The differences between the two groups were all highly significant ( p < .001): drug-dependent prison inmates scored higher than non-drug-dependent inmates in every domain and, consequently, manifested a higher overall psychological distress level.

These differences were statistically highly significant (p >0.001) (Figure 1 ).

The relationship between neural slowing and amyloid-β burden was highly significant [ t (570037) = –61.97, P < 0.001], such that greater regional amyloid-β burden was associated with stronger oscillatory slowing across cortical regions, and this effect was greater in patients with probable Alzheimer’s disease than those with aMCI [ t (570036) = −9.52, P < 0.001; Fig. 4 ].

Subsequently, we identified highly significant ( P < 0.001) levels of hypoxia score across 13 pancarcinomas (i.e., HNSC vs THCA) by applying the Bonferroni correction test for multiple comparisons.