“highly significant”

Even though all coefficients in the fit were highly significant ( p < 0.001), the low r 2 = 0.047 indicates that mother diameter and daughter asymmetry account only little (4.7%) for the encountered variability.

Mean NLR for a normal group is 1.94 ± 0.65 and in DN group is 2.83 ± 0.85 which was highly significant ( P < 0.001).

There were highly significant positive correlations between QDQ scores and F-WAIT activity in insula (MNI[ x / y / z ] = −35/20/5; r delay aversion = .57, p < 0.001; r temporal discounting = .57, p < .001) and inferior frontal gyrus (MNI[ x / y / z ] = −35/25/0; r delay aversion = .51, p = 0.001; r temporal discounting = .53, p

In contrast, the UUO group exhibited extensive collagen accumulation in the interstitial area, showing a highly significant increase compared to the control group (p<0.001) ( Figure 15B and C ).

Crucially, in this adjusted model, the association for group assignment remained highly significant (RR 0.31 (95% c.i. 0.19 to 0.52) for noise isolation versus control; P < 0.001).

Statistical difference was considered to be significant at a value of P< 0.05 (*), highly significant at a value of P< 0.01 (**) and extremely significant when P< 0.001(***).

The negative buffering effect of diversity on variability across the gradient was similar in microorganisms and macroorganisms (similar slopes, ANCOVA interaction: P = 0.71), and a single linear fit across both microorganisms and macroorganisms was highly significant (CV = 156–71.1 logS, R 2 = 0.58, P < 0.001; Supplementary Information: Fig.

Overall, each subject trades on average in 7.02 periods when there is an externality, but in 8.56 periods when there is none, 7 and this difference is highly significant ( p < 0.001, Mann–Whitney U test with the average relative trading volume in each market as unit of observation, N = 64).

We next tested whether participant clusters were distributed differently across the studies, after excluding those non-responses, and found highly significant differences (Chi-squared test; P-value < 0.001) ( Fig 2B ).

Cognitive Difficulty A highly significant main effect emerged, F (1,21) = 111.81, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.83, with substantially higher workload ratings in mixed task blocks compared to repeat‐only blocks.

Genetic subdivision was highly significant between regions ( F CT = 0.882, P < 0.001 for mtCOI; F CT = 0.713, P < 0.001 for nrITS), indicating a high level of geographical population structure.

At this stage, the hydrogels showed statistically significant differences ( p < 0.01) compared to SF, and highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) compared to the CT- group, which reached only about 46% wound closure.

A highly significant (p<0.001) reduction was observed in number of withdrawals when male mice were treated with CXB-NE over free drug (CXB) at days 1 and day 32 (Figure 1 C).

A highly significant increase (P < 0.001) was observed in LDL-cholesterol and total cholesterol/HDL-cholesterol ratio in HFD group in comparison to the control group.

Adjusted model (controlled for age, BMI, smoking, GOLD stage): CAT score → BODE index: β = 0.122 (95% CI: 0.098-0.146), p < 0.001; adjusted R2 = 0.720 Interpretation: The adjusted association remained highly significant (p < 0.001) and was not materially different from the unadjusted correlation (Δβ = 0.004, or 0.6% change), suggesting minimal confounding by age, BMI, smoking status, or disease severity classification.

Among them, laccase, β-glucosidase, and filter paperase exhibited highly significant correlations with SC/N ( r = 0.80, 0.99, and 0.95, respectively; p < 0.001), while carboxymethyl cellulase showed a slightly weaker correlation ( r = 0.67, p < 0.01), possibly due to substrate specificity.

In non-matched force-rotation, interference was highly significant (Figure 5 D CF vs. nFR (7) , post-hoc , p < 0.001).

Although all pairwise comparisons between TMRCA, expansion time, and N e were highly significant ( P < 0.001, table 2 ), the ρ values ranged from 0.61 to 0.75.

These differences were highly significant (in both comparisons, P < 0.001).

The Spearman correlation coefficients r were r TM = 0.77, r PM = 0.78 and r I = 0.97 and were highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Correlation between RA performance and RVEF was weak but highly significant for all atrial functional parameters (RA ε s r = 0.19, SRs r = 0.23, ε e r = 0.15, SRe r = −0.17, ε a r = 0.14, and SRa −0.13, p < 0.001 for all).

The χ 2 test results were highly significant ( P < 0.001) for age by raw milk exposure status.

On the first day after surgery a highly significant ( p < 0.001) decrease by 33.68% to 27.61 ± 12.55 μmol/L at T2 ( Figure 2 ) was observed.

When comparing the Parkinson’s disease patients of the PPP dataset with the ABRIM dataset comprising more healthy control subjects, NAcc, SNc, SNr, and RN showed highly significant differences (adjusted p -value < 0.001) on both R 2 * and χ (dark yellow, Fig. 7b, c ).

In both groups, aortic stenosis was successfully treated, as reflected by highly significant decreases of Vmax, dpmax and dpmean ( p < 0.001).