“highly significant”

Additionally, there were highly significant correlations between two values estimated by data average and data moving average (800-second data processing: amplitude r=1.000 [p<0.001], MESOR r=0.838 [p<0.001], acrophase r=1.000 [p<0.001]).

Moreover, there were highly significant total effects of -SH groups ( t = −5.62, p < 0.001) on the TLE-PP phenome that were mediated by MDA ( t = −3.48, p = 0.001) and the path from CMPAase to MDA ( t = 3.41, p = 0.001).

Differences were considered significant as follows: * means 0.01 ≤ p < 0.05 significant; ** means 0.001 ≤ p < 0.01 highly significant and *** means p < 0.001 very highly significant; ns: indicates not significant. 3.

For the investigated time frame, a highly significant decrease ( p = 0.001) in survival rate of CAP treated eggs was observed.

PASI showed a highly significant, direct and very strong correlation with severity and vice versa (0.993; p < 0.001 ***). 4.

The dmft and DMFT within the four BMI categories by one-way ANOVA were highly significant ( p < 0.001).

This difference was highly significant ( p < 0.001) ( Figure 2 ). 3.3.

The difference was highly significant in the Mann–Whitney U test ( p < 0.001).

The statistical difference in myopia prevalence was highly significant (Chi-square, p < 0.001) between the close and other reading distance groups but non-significant (Chi-square, p = 0.645) between the normal and distant reading distance groups.

Serum concentrations of vitamin D in patients showed a highly significant reduction than controls ( P = 0.001), while serum concentrations of IL-22 (ng/mL) in patients was significantly higher in psoriatic patients (104.5 ± 40.9) versus controls (27.7 ± 6.9), ( P = 0.001) [ Figure 1 ].

Highly significant genetic variations ( p < 0.001) were observed for the BSR disease in the field and greenhouse with a moderately high broad-sense heritability ( H 2 ) ranging from 0.66 to 0.73.

Highly significant ( p < 0.001) and positive associations were observed among agronomic attributes, N uptake, NUE, and crop water productivity of upland rice in correlation assessment.

Remarkably, the correlations of the GCGN–alanine index became highly significant upon the high protein intake for 6 weeks for IHL (ρ = 0.652, p < 0.001) ( Figure 2B ) and for insulin sensitivity (ρ = 0.644, p < 0.001) ( Figure 2A ).

The result shows that there is a highly significant difference (value of p < 0.001) between the tolerant and the susceptible genotypes confirming the outcomes observed with electrophoresis.

Results: A highly significant difference between groups was observed in vitamin K2 level ( P < 0.001) being 1.61 ± 0.56 ng/ml, 2.04 ± 0.59 ng/ml and 2.96 ± 0.82 ng/ml for groups I, II and III, respectively.

-32.78±2.06, respectively), presenting a highly significant difference( P <0.001) ( Table 3 ).

We detected highly significant negative phenotypic correlations between dry matter and total carotenoid contents (− 0.31, p < 0.001); mean CMD severity and harvest index (r = − 0.14, p < 0.001); and apical pubescence and CGM severity (r = − 0.27, p < 0.001).

General linear analysis shows a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001) between the normal gravity and simulated microgravity populations when the 0-time point is omitted indicating that adaptation of this phenotype is specific to the environment.

The results indicate that GC3s showed a highly significant positive correlation with GC, FOP, G3s and C3S ( p < 0.001), a highly significant negative correlation with U3s and A3s content ( p < 0.001), and a significant negative correlation with GC12 ( p < 0.05); CAI values showed a highly significant positive correlation with C3s and FOP ( p < 0.01), and a significant negative correlation with A3s ( p < 0.01) ( Figure S5 ). 2.7.

Statistical significance was defined with p < 0.05 (*, significant), p < 0.01 (**; highly significant), and p < 0.001 (***; highly significant).

The effect of food on the biphasic growth model is highly significant at 15°C ( F (1, 556) = 59.44; P < 0.001), where the growth model gave better results in ‘fed’ conditions compared with the ‘non-fed’ condition ( Fig. 3B ).

Inversely, there appeared to be a highly significant effect ( p < 0.001), when the interaction between genotype and incubation time was extrapolated to the activity of FruK, and to a lesser extent to the activities of ATP-PFK, PGI and PGM ( p < 0.05).

A p -value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant, a p -value of <0.01 was considered statistically highly significant, and a p -value of <0.001 was considered statistically extremely significant. 3.7.

The differences were strong (Wald’s χ 2 ≥ 11.80) and highly significant ( p < 0.001) for the volume, depth, and particularly for width of the soil–root plate.

The effect of Genotype was very highly significant ( p < 0.001) for protein content, Fe, and Mn and significant ( p < 0.05) for Zn, demonstrating real differences among the 15 vegetable cowpea entries for expression of these traits and suggesting genetic variability that could be used in varietal improvement.