“highly significant”

The simple linear trend alone was not significant (p = 0.74) but the addition of the quadratic term gave a highly significant fit (χ 2 = 12.93 on 2 df; p = 0.0016): TI was negatively associated with As, but this association diminished at high-exposure levels.

When only patients on suppressive HAART were considered, the correlation remained highly significant (r = 0.7602, p = 0.0016).

A similar, but non-significant trend was evident among the HUB1 line individuals ( Table 3 ), together yielding a highly significant Fisher's combined probability of P = 0.0016 [ Χ 2 = -2*(ln(0.011)+ln(0.141)) = 12.94 with DF = 2].

3 b ) which is highly significant ( P = 0.0016 compared to naïve).

Since the effect of increased small bowel water inflow would be maximal in the ascending colon, we also measured just the ascending colon at 360 min when the differences between the test drinks were highly significant (p=0.0016).

Ethyl acetate extract showed highly significant inhibitory activity compared to ethanol extract ( p= 0.0016).

2 ) and a highly significant difference in dispersion (betadisper, F 1,13 = 15.7, P = 0.0016).

Statistical analysis confirmed a highly significant difference between the particle sizes of the three batches, ensuring a reliable size-related comparison for examining their effects on platelets in PRP ( p = 0.0016 and 0.0006 comparing PS of batch 1 and 2 with batches 2 and 3, respectively).

Despite these constraints, performance was also highly significant (one sample t-test: t(11) = 4.16, p = 0.0016, 95% CI [6.836, 22.17]).

Importantly, a combination of the main effects on Per2 expression resulted in a highly significant change in the difference between these two test times (p = 0.0016 for Per2 ; p = 0.00015 for N/P; Table 1 ).

Among COPD patients who had a BMI of ≥ 25 kg/m2 and BMI < 25 kg/m2, when compared, the statistical difference was highly significant (t = 3.2559; df = 98; P = 0.0016).

Indeed, a paired groups t-test was highly significant ( P = 0.0016; means: 14.41 for the left-eye-to-target condition and 3.45 for the right-eye-to-target condition).

The ANOVA of the quadratic regression model demonstrated that the model is highly significant, evidenced by an F -value equal to 13.97 in the Fisher F -test and a very low probability value ( P -value =0.0016) (Table 3 ) [ 26 ].

Univariate analysis yielded highly significant differences among all tumors in RFS ( P = 0.0016) and OS ( P <0.0015) ( Fig 4A & 4B ).

However, 16 CIU patients with respiratory symptoms had dust mite reactivity as compared to 3 CIU patients with respiratory symptoms but without mite reactivity (highly significant, P = 0.0016).

A highly significant correlation ( R 2 = 0.5493, p = 0.0016) of the interhemispheric difference of nicotinic receptors in the groups LB and LV and apomorphine-induced rotations was found (Figure 5E ).

A modest but highly significant survival advantage was also observed for female heterozygotes ( p = 0.0016); 90% of these animals survived for at least 1 day longer than their wild-type littermates, although 12 of 13 heterozygous mice eventually succumbed ( Figure 2C ).

4 f), the differences between the genotypes in center time was highly significant [genotype × time interaction, F (11,154) = 2.91, p = 0.0016].

With n = 33 states, both correlations remained highly significant (Income: r = 0.529, P = .0016; GDP: r = 0.482, P = .0045), confirming the robustness of the socioeconomic–pricing relationship across standard state jurisdictions.

However, because this term is associated with a large numbers of transcripts (1187) the enrichment is highly significant (p = 0.0016 at FDR≤10 −6 ), consistent with the role of this metabolic compartment in light-grown plants.

The analysis revealed that time had a highly significant effect on cholesterol concentrations ( p = 0.0016), indicating a meaningful change in cholesterol over the course of the study.

The difference was highly significant when an unpaired t -test was performed ( P = 0.0016).

In comparative analysis of controls and CNP patients, WLS ( P = 4.80 × 10 –7 ), CHPT1 ( P = 7.74 × 10 –7 ) and CASP5 ( P = 2.30 × 10 –5 ) were highly significant, whilst FGFBP2 ( P = 0.00162), STAT1 ( P = 0.00223), FCRL6 ( P = 0.00335), MYC ( P = 0.00335), XCL2 ( P = 0.0144) and GZMA ( P = 0.0168) were significant in all CNP patients.

The regression model predicted that in presence of aCCP, anti-S levels increased by 6.28 times, a highly significant result (p= 0.00165).

Several interaction terms exhibited highly significant effects, particularly temperature × wind speed ( p = 0.00167) and relative humidity × soil (dust) load ( p = 0.00083).