“highly significant”

Furthermore, the plasma triglycerides-to-HDL ratio, a known marker for metabolic syndrome and highly atherogenic dyslipidemia,[ 18 ] showed a highly significant correlation with mFD (r = 0.480, p = 0.002).

ANOVA revealed the familiar effect of number of fingers in common ( F (1,15) = 34.23, p<.001, η 2 = .695), a highly significant effect of congruence ( F (1,15) = 14.00, p = .002, η 2 = .483), and a significant interaction ( F (1,15) = 4.74, p = .016, η 2 = .241).

Likelihood ratio test comparison between the full and null models was highly significant ( χ 9 2 = 19.46 , p = 0.002).

The same was true for the EPITARGET dataset, where all factors were highly significant ( p < 0.002).

A strong and highly significant correlation ( r = 0.64; p = 0.002) was found between the assessment of EMC using the VR simulation and the CRA performance test using the PEF.

The results of that analysis, shown in Figure 3 , confirm that degree of perturbation was more difficult to distinguish for some PL animations compared to others, but the pattern of results was the same for healthy controls and patients, with the correlation between groups being highly significant (r = 0.85, p = 0.002).

Results: There was a highly significant association between higher Beclin1 and LC3B immunoreactivity score and Gleason score (score 8 and 9) ( P =0.002 and 0.000, respectively).

This difference was highly significant (P = 0.002).

In particular, a strong and highly significant correlation was found for samples from the North Region (n = 8, R 2 = 0.751, p < 0.002).

All groups showed highly significant differences: high (Δ t > −2.2°C) vs. moderate cooling (Δ t 2.2–1.5°C) ( p = 0.002); moderate vs. low cooling (Δ t < −1.5°C) ( p = 0.0006) (Figure 6 ).

The difference in PS change between responders and non-responders is highly significant (P = 0.002).

At each assessment, the Fisher’s exact analysis of those having categorical change was highly significant ( P < 0.002), with more oral treprostinil participants having an improved risk profile and fewer having a deteriorated risk profile ( Figure 4C ).

Splitting the analysis by gender consequently gave a highly significant association for women [χ 2 (1) = 10.71, p = 0.002] but not for men [χ 2 (1) = 0.052, p<1.00].

Despite these limitations, the trends in the data sets regarding surgical time, hospital stays, blood loss, and complication rates were highly significant ( P < 0.002).

The results for indication for ultrasound examination were highly significant ( P = 0.002) while the results for CUA did not reach statistical significance ( P = 0.09).

That study further showed a highly significant loss of cartilage volume, quantified using MRI, in severe medial meniscal tear compared with absence of tear ( P = 0.002).

Cutting speed itself contributed 20.99% and was highly significant (F = 539.29, p = 0.002).

For the 60-meter sprint, the mean time for females improved from 8.72 s to 8.63 s, a highly significant change (t = 3.889, p = 0.002), and the mean time for males was found to have decreased from 7.68 s to 7.58 s (t = 4.281, p = 0.001).

However, the role of anxiodepressive syndromes was highly significant ( p = 0.002) with borderline significance for joint pain ( p = 0.05).

However, when associated with host order, which itself had highly significant influence ( p = 0.002; R 2 = 0.2072), it strengthened the host order effect ( Figure 3 A).

However, APD activity had a highly significant ( p = 0.002, adj.

Remarkably, a support-vector machine-based multiparameter classificator built on these data achieved highly significant prediction performance with a balanced accuracy of 82.7% (Sens. = 76.5%, Spec. = 88.9%, p = 0.002, Fig. 1 a and Table 2 ).

About 31.3% ( n = 15) of those with angle fractures had superficially impacted third molar and 27.1% ( n = 13) had deeply impacted third molar, whereas all the 51.4% ( n = 19) of those with condylar fractures had superficially impacted third molar which was highly significant statistically with P = 0.002 [ Table 2 ].

The meta-analysis showed a highly significant RR of relapse after gluten challenge as compared to placebo of 2.8 (95% CI, 1.5–5.5; p = 0.002; I2 = 80.3%), and a highly significant IRR of 5.7 (95% CI, 2.2–14.5; p = 0.0003; I2 = 87%).

Schizophrenia shows highly significant LoF correlations with developmental disorder (p=2.0e-3) and intellectual disability (3.7e-5).