Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantp = 0.0030.1× alphaqualifiedgold
Further Kaplan–Meier analysis stratified by tumour stage revealed a highly significant difference in survival based on tumour size (log-rank p = 0.003), with patients having tumours > 4 cm experiencing markedly poorer survival, particularly in Stage III–IV disease, where their median survival was only 26 months, compared to those with tumours ≤ 4 cm, whose median survival was not reached.
highly significantP = 0.0030.1× alphaqualifiedgold
borderline significanceP = 0.071.4× alpha
AVCMF (181/276 relapsed; control (199/263 relapsed); X2, = 11.68; P= 0.006. Prolongation of relapse-free survival was highly significant in premenopausal patients (X2i = 8.8; P = 0.003: Figure 2a) but of only borderline significance in post-menopausal patients (X21 = 3.3; P = 0.07: Figure 2b).
highly significantp = 0.0030.1× alphaqualifiedgold
Real-time RT-PCR analysis of mortalin transcript abundance in the anterior rudiment reveals two peaks of roughly 3-fold up-regulation, one on day 7 (p = 0.036) and another one on day 21 (p = 0.019) (Figure 9C ), while, in the posterior rudiment, the overall mortalin expression level shows a highly significant increase as early as on day 3 after evisceration (p = 0.003) and then returns to the approximately normal level on days 7 to 21 (Figure 9D ).
highly significantp- value = .0030.1× alphaqualifiedgold
Interactions between sex and the age components transformed in the spline basis were introduced but only the parameter for the interaction with the third component was highly significant ( p- value = .003) and was retained in the final model (denoted by γ i ).
highly significantp = 0.0030.1× alphaqualifiedgold
Compared to our healthy cohort, the MWU indicated a highly significant difference for the CDT (FD −1.29 ± 1.37 vs. controls 0.038 ± 0.99; p = 0.003) and MPT (FD 1.51 ± 1.06 vs. controls 0.49 ± 0.94; p = 0.006) at the foot. 3.2.2.
Cold-evoked potentials in Fabry disease and polyneuropathy.
Front Pain Res (Lausanne) · 2024 · PMC11133603
highly significantp < 0.0030.1× alphaqualifiedgold
These results suggest that treatment is more effective in the neuropathic pain group, with 8 items statistically significantly improved ( p < 0.050), 5 of which were highly significant ( p < 0.003), i.e., background pain, number of painful attacks, general activity, sleep, and anxiety ( Table 5 ). 4.
highly significantp = .0030.1× alphaqualifiedgold
Furthermore, mixture and monoculture planting treatment also had a highly significant effect on herbivory rates in S. johorensis seedlings (Figure 4c,d , F 1, 102 = 9.038, p = .003) (see Table 3 ). 3.4 Effects of distance from parents and density on herbivory of new leaves There was no significant effect of distance and density on production of new leaves in seedlings of either.
highly significantp = 0. 0030.1× alphaqualifiedgold
Additionally, we further measured the rise in N2pc amplitude and the rise in CDA amplitude from one item to two items and found that there was also a highly significant correlation between the rise in the N2pc amplitude and the rise in CDA amplitude for both adults with ADHD (r = 0. 532, p = 0. 003, two-tailed) and controls (r = 0. 487, p = 0. 006, two-tailed).
highly significantp = 0.0030.1× alphaqualifiedgold
However, it can also be noted that the difference in phenotypes were highly significant ( p = 0.003 and p < 0.0001 for the WB and FE phenotypes, respectively), suggesting that the relative differences in global expression patterns could be considered representative of a larger phenotype population.