In the NC-FET group, the OR for clinical pregnancy following HRT-FET cycles was 1.47, 95%CI 1.24-1.75, and it was highly significant (P-value =0.003).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
Among educational level factors, being highly educated victims had a highly significant risk factor in the visceral injury of the head (AOR = 3.846(95%CI:1.580–9.363); P = 0.003).
There was highly significant association between baseline Hb levels (p = 0.003) and day 7 LF plasma concentrations (p = 0.008) with RP.
This is a highly significant change ( p < 0.003).
Additionally, there was a highly significant positive correlation between the total frequency of threatening behaviors and the total frequency of agonistic behaviors within a pair (r = 0.929, p = 0.003). 4.
ANOVA on MEPi recorded with the lower TMS intensity (120% rMT) revealed a significant main effect of Space ( F 1,11 = 5.81, p <.04) and Time ( F 3,33 = 5.05, p <.01) and most importantly, a highly significant Space × Delay interaction ( F 3,33 = 7.56, p <.003; see Figure 2A ).
In female patients with breast cancer, there was a strong positive relationship and highly significant correlation between HMTV and BRCA1 as well as BRCA2 (r = 0.443, p = 0.003 and r = 0.58, p = 0.006, respectively; p < 0.01).
BMI Z-scores decreased steadily from approximately 0.5 at lower levels of teacher support to around 0.1 at higher levels, representing a reduction of about 0.4 standard deviation units, with a highly significant linear trend ( P = 0.003).
Results: Analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed a highly significant polarity-independent group*task effect ( p =0.003) for the vigilance task.
The estimated pooled OR for both 2 trials shows a highly significant reduction of the risk of recurrence for patients receiving adoptive immunotherapy (OR = 0.35; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.71; p = 0.003; Fig. 2 ).
This analysis revealed a highly significant group effect (F (1,13) = 12.717, p = 0.003) and a large statistical effect size(partial η 2 = 0.5).
Results showed a significantly lower relapse rate at a 2-year follow-up compared with controls (25% vs 80%), with the CBT package highly significant, in delaying recurrence ( P =0.003).
2.2 Combining ability effects estimated The analysis of variance for the combining ability ( Table 3 ) revealed that the mean squares of GCA was positive and highly significant for the days to harvest (P < 0.003013), HPW (P < 0.0009951), HSW (P < 0.048880), SYH (P < 0.01811), pod length (P < 1,878e-07), pod width (P < 0.0011664), seed length (P < 0.006127), and seed width (0.04096).
Indeed, the treatment effect on the primary endpoint (CSMS(n)) was statistically highly significant ( p = 0.0031), with a trend for a significant difference in the treatment effect of −0.39 (95% CI, −0.64 to −0.13) points based on the subgroup analysis in the observed data, exceeding the 0.25‐point threshold.
Further, the difference is highly significant (p=0.0031, linear mixed effects model that controls for unit and subject effects), and quite sufficient for decoding.
Patients with BD showed a highly significant decrease of the white matter ROI volume (p = 0.0031), validating the findings of the meta-analysis.
2 B), the difference observed for the feature “variance” was highly significant (8.25 vs 8.94 vs 9.61; p = 0.0031).
Comparison of patient groups based on nuclear CKS2 expression led to a highly significant ( P = .0031) but somewhat smaller separation of 34% between the groups ( Figure 5 D ).
Among them, SPL14 exhibited a highly significant decrease in hybridization density during the transition, (6.7-fold reduction, P = 0.0031, Figs.
Again, in sharp contrast with this result, highly significant differences have been observed for the TuMV-DV across the four thermal environments ( Fig. 2A , red lines and symbols: χ 2 = 8.7213, 1 df, P = 0.0031).
There was a highly significant association between the p.R279C variant (rs117068593) and PDB in the sequenced samples compared with 1000 Genome controls (OR = 0.60; 95% CI = 0.43–0.84; P = 3.1 × 10 −3 ) and when compared with NHLBI controls (OR = 0.50; 95% CI = 0.38–0.67; P = 2.0 × 10 −6 ).
Overall, the differences in numbers of up- versus down-regulated transcripts in responders versus non-responders were highly significant, whether considering only the number of transcripts with a significant difference at baseline versus 3 months ( n = 8, p = 3.10 -3 , Fisher's exact test) or considering the complete set of transcripts and associated trends ( n = 20, p < 10 -4 by Fisher's exact test, or p = 0.007 by analysis of variance).
Among these miRNAs, downregulation of miRNA-215 expression was highly significant in the STOP-IM group (plasma miRNAs, p = 0.00311 ( Table S1 ); exosomal miRNAs, p = 0.00039 ( Table S2 )); therefore, we concluded that plasma miR-215 expression mirrors exosomal miRNA expression and focused on expression of this miRNA for further study. 2.2.
Males had a significantly higher Physical Functioning (PF) score ( P = .0163, 95% CI −4.315 to −0.4628) and a highly significant difference was seen on the Bodily Pain (BP) item ( P = .0032, 95%CI −10.56 to −2.269) ( Figure 1A ).
There is a highly significant interaction between genotype (treatment) and sex (p = 0.0032).