“highly significant”

A-B Box and B Box-97 peptides retained highly significant anti-biofilm activity against all pathogens tested when analyzed by both parametric and non-parametric one-way ANOVA (P = 0.004–P < 0.0001; with the exception of A-B Box tested against NTHI, which; although normally distributed and statistically significant by parametric one-way ANOVA, approaches significance (P = 0.055) when analyzed by nonparametric one-way ANOVA)) ( Fig. 2 A).

After combining the two transect probabilities by Fisher's method, overall genetic isolation by temporal distance was highly significant ( P = 0.004).

Scan time Analysis of risk factor demonstrated that there were four factors affecting scan time: (a) Hypertension —a significant effect (p = 0.013) was seen to be exerted by hypertension, with the scanning time increasing from 23.5 seconds (non-hypertensives) to 24.5 seconds (hypertensives); (b) Diabetes —a highly significant effect (p = 0.004) was observed in the presence of Diabetes (diabetics vs non-diabetics 24.9 secs vs 23.4 secs); (c) Age —every additional year of age was reflected in a reduction of scanning time by 0.038 seconds.

The difference in the magnitude of the fibrotic response to 10 Gy in the T cell knock down animals compared with the wild type animals was highly significant ( Figure 6 , p = 0.004), suggesting that during the evolution of the radiation response, T cells supply factors that contribute to the deposition of perivascular collagen in the heart. 3.6.

These differences were highly significant (treatment:day/night interaction, χ 2 (3) = 13.5, p = 0.004).

The heterogeneity between all prospective and retrospective studies was highly significant ( P = 0.004).

The value of each parameter was lower for atrial tissue than ventricular, and these differences were highly significant: p = 0.004 for ERP, p = 0.003 for CV and p < 0.001 for LAT.

A highly significant relationship between the scores obtained by two methods was also observed ( P =0.004).

Although PrxII was only increased by 1.9-fold, this change was statistically highly significant p = 0.004, and PrxII can be mechanistically linked to inflammation, hemolysis, and endothelial damage.

The standardized and adjusted size effect of PAH in the two-pollutant model was highly significant and about ten times stronger ( β = −0.20, p = 0.004) than that attributed to PM 2.5 ( β = −0.02, p = 0.757).

Correlation of TIM-3 mRNA expression with serum IgA was highly significant (r=0.425, P=0.004), but was weakly correlated with total serum protein (r s =0.283, P=0.049) and serum albumin (r s =0.297, P=0.047).

MLT was highly significant in the KM, PKRM, and LKRM scenarios ( p ≤ 0.004), marginally significant in the IKRM scenario ( p = 0.049), and not-significant in the RM scenario ( p = 0.055).

Group classification reached highly significant values for inter-group comparison in terms of minimizing r → in EPT ( p = 0.004, r = 0.826) (Table 1 ) 30 .

The increase was highly significant ( p = 0.004) ( Table 4 ).

Among the three explanatory variables, spring precipitation had the greatest influence on model performance ( p < 0.001), though the interaction term was also highly significant ( p = 0.004).

Mann-Whitney tests show that these differences of area are highly significant: between clade B2 and other species (p = 0.004), and between clade B2 and all other species from clade B (p = 0.023).

Specifically, repeated contrasts revealed this increase in response time under crossed conditions to be approaching significance as the number of targets increased from 3 to 4 ( p = .06), and highly significant as the number of target kits increased from 4 to 5 ( p = .004).

According to allelic models, the findings demonstrated that there is a highly significant distinction between healthy and pregnant patients ( P = 0.004, OR = 1.22) (Fig. 1 ).

also found that there was a highly significant difference in olfactory loss in the RBD cohort who converted to PD (75%) compared to those who did not (48%, p < 0.004) (Fereshtehnejad et al., 2017 ).

This relationship was highly significant, especially after adjustment: each 10-ng increase in c- PAH levels in the Teplice district resulted in an increase of AORs by 1.22 (CI, 1.07-1.39, p < 0.004; Table 3); a similar, but nonsignifi- cant increase was found for Prachatice (1.17, CI, 0.92-1.89).

This difference was highly significant ( p = 0.004).

When considering all measurements of change in velocity and time in burst within and across subjects as independent, the negative correlation was highly significant (R = –0.31, P = .004), see Fig. 4 A.

In regards to the TNF-α:IGF ratio, age was a highly significant predictor of the differences in this catabolic:anabolic ratio outcome (p = 0.004) in this study.

Using this cut-off value, a highly significant prognostic role for CD8 on RFS was observed (Figure 2 , log-rank test, p = 0.004, cohort 2).

The increase in cell viability was highly significant ( P =0.004).