“highly significant”

The same analysis for depression measured with N-70 could not be done due to the highly significant result of Levene's test of equality of errors [ F (7,240) = 3.00, p = 0.005].

The increase in TSLPR expression was highly significant in the ICL group (p<0.005), even though the frequency of TSLPR+ cells remained relatively low (median value: 2.7%; range: 1.2%–10.3%).

Furthermore, the perceived effectiveness of these strategies showed highly significant intergroup variability ( p = 0.005).

Scar appearance, as judged by the Vancouver Scar Scale clinical standard, was equivalent between treatment groups after one month, but after nine months αCT1 treated scars showed a highly significant, 47%, improvement ( p < 0.005) in scar appearance ( Figure 3 ).

In line with this suggestive association result, the comparison of medieval cases with modern individuals yielded a frequency difference that was highly significant (10.2%; p = 0.005 , OR = 3.61) ( Table S1 ).

This association was highly significant also in the subset of conventional variant PTC ( P = 0.005) and marginally significant in follicular variant PTC ( P = 0.06).

There was a highly significant difference in the cumulative volume of HO between both groups with decreased HO volume in the treatment group compared to the control group ( p = 0.005, Fig. 4 ).

One-way analysis of variance, ANOVA, was used to reveal the statistically significant data ( p < 0.05 was considered significant and p < 0.005 was considered highly significant). 2.4 IgG1 Binding Capacity Analysis with Protein L-Captured Antibodies as Ligands: FcγRIa and Protein A were Used as Analytes The binding analyses of the FcγRIa and protein A (Sigma-Aldrich) in solution were carried out on a protein L-immobilized dextran-coated CM5 chip (Cytiva).

In contrast, F10 showed a highly significant difference (p > 0.005) (Supplementary Table 5).

Consistent with the previous study (Chen et al , 2019a ), our analyses revealed a highly significant correlation ( r = 0.9739; P = 0.005) between the EC 50 values of five PARPi (thioparib, talazoparib, olaparib, rucaparib, and veliparib) in the DSB FA model and their average cytotoxic IC 50 values in 16 HR‐deficient cell lines (Fig 1D ; Appendix Table S2 ).

The interaction between changes in the HADS-D score and the 5-HTTLPR genotype remained highly significant for the change in CD4+ lymphocyte percentage (B=-2.42, p=0.005).

We found a highly significant increase in the neutrophil to macrophage ratio between the disease models (p = 0.0050, Figure 5F ), consistent with the known mechanisms of the Th17 system.

Highly significant differences were defined in cases with p -values ≤ 0.005 and significantly different cases with p -values between 0.05 and 0.0051. 5.

The correlations between the two PEth homologues were highly significant and increased during the study: rs = 0.705 ( p = 0.005, n = 14) at baseline and rs = 0.918 ( p = 0.000, n = 21) after 2 weeks of alcohol consumption.

Mean relative forelimb and hindlimb length, and orbital width were also the highest among sampled taxa, although the distribution of these values overlapped more considerably ( figure 3 ). Non-parametric MANOVA detected highly significant differences between taxa ( p < 0.005).

Using band densitometry to compare relative expression levels, we found that, on average, signature envelope expression was 2.5-fold higher than non-signature envelope expression; the difference in signal intensity between the two groups was highly significant (p<.005).

After adjustment for age, sex, smoking status, diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia, these associations were still highly significant for ischemic heart failure (OR = 0.74; 95% CI = 0.60–0.91, P = 0.005) and retained borderline significance for nonischemic heart failure (OR = 0.80; 95% CI = 0.61–1.00, P = 0.050). 3.3.

An analysis of variance revealed a statistically highly significant difference ( P < 0.005) among the different posts used, and a statistically significant difference between carbon posts vs. zirconia posts, carbon posts vs. everStick posts, and zirconia posts vs. everStick posts ( P < 0.05).

There were highly significant main effects of language/modality [ F (2, 20) = 6.96, p = 0.005], ROI [ F (9, 90) = 6.76, p < 0.0001], and hemisphere [ F (1, 10) = 10.07, p = 0.01].

Glass slides inoculated with MRSA strain M1 and treated with singular phage showed highly significant reductions in CFUs (p ≤ 0.005) compared to mock treatments ( Fig 2B ).

The Monte Carlo test showed that there were highly significant differences ( p = 0.005) between the stress values observed for the axes extracted by NMDS.

In comparison, drug treated cells when exposed to the same amount of 131 I, highly significant reduction in the cell survival (p ≤ 0.005) was observed in all three cell lines.

Two-way ANOVA revealed that the impact of the three independent factors (the total volume of solvents, the concentration of Mg stearate, and the ambient temperature during stirring) separately was highly significant ( P < 0.005) on the %EE.

The test compares each method’s performance against a theoretical median of zero, with all approaches yielding highly significant p-values of 0.002 ( p < 0.005), confirming substantial improvements over baseline performance.

Results Stomatal conductance model The measured light responses of stomatal conductance showed highly significant linear correlations with both A n and 1 − q L ( p < 0.005, Fig. 1 a, b).