Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantP < 0.0050.1× alphaqualifiedgold
The RA patients with an insufficient response to MTX who received the tacrolimus-MTX combination showed highly significant improvement in the DAS28 after 4 weeks (n = 10, baseline: 4.51 ± 0.31 to 4.03 ± 0.28, P < 0.005), 12 weeks (n = 9, baseline: 4.59 ± 0.34 to 3.38 ± 0.29, P < 0.01) and 24 weeks (n = 8, baseline: 4.45 ± 0.35 to 3.12 ± 0.34, P < 0.01) ( Figure 1 ).
highly significantp -values ≤ 0.0050.1× alphaqualifiedgold
A p -value > 0.05 indicated that the data followed a normal distribution and justified the use of t -tests: Differences were considered as “highly significant” in cases with p -values ≤ 0.005, as “significant” with p -values ≤ 0.05, and as “borderline significant” with p -values between 0.05 and 0.10.
highly significantp = 0.0050.1× alphaqualifiedgold
Among the 32 subjects in the bryostatin treatment group in the Moderate Stratum Cohort in the #203 study, we found a difference = 4.1 points (with imputed data) in the mean SIB at week 13 from baseline (See Table 5 below), a result that is highly significant ( p = 0.005).
highly significantp = 0.0050.1× alphaqualifiedgold
marginally significantp = 0.0571.1× alphagold
The removal of one influential data point (see figure 1 ) weakened these relationships, becoming non-significant for ROUTINE ( p = 0.27), marginally significant for OXPHOS ( p = 0.057) but remaining highly significant for ETS ( p = 0.005).
highly significantP = 0.0050.1× alphaqualifiedgold
After seven days of intracerebroventricular (ICV) infusion of BDNF (1.2 μg over 24 h), WT mice experience a highly significant ( P = 0.005) decrease in food consumption and a significant ( P = 0.01) decrease in body weight, whereas mice receiving infusion of artificial cerebrospinal fluid do not.
highly significantp < 0.0050.1× alphaqualifiedgold
Statistical significance was determined by a two-tailed p -value < 0.05, with hierarchical notation based on the degree of difference: * p < 0.05 (statistically significant), ** p < 0.01 (highly significant), *** p < 0.005 (extremely highly significant), **** p < 0.0001 (profoundly significant), and ns (no significant difference between groups). 3.
highly significantp < 0,0050.1× alphaqualifiedgold
However, among SOX11 positive cases we found a highly significant correlation between SOX4 and SOX11 (Spearman's correlation coefficient: 0,56; p < 0,005), SOX12 and SOX11 (Spearman's correlation coefficient: 0,63; p < 0,005) and moderate correlation between SOX12 and SOX4 mRNA (Spearman's correlation coefficient: 0,40; p < 0,005).
highly significantp < 0.0050.1× alphaqualifiedgold
When both age and diabetes were taken into account by taking all three groups of testing subjects into consideration ( Table 5 ), MEI SS (RRI), MEI LS (RRI), and MCEI LS (RRI,CT) were found to be negatively associated with age in a highly significant way (all p < 0.005).