“highly significant”

The comparison revealed no significant difference between the CN and aMCI groups for epochs 1–11, whereas a highly significant difference was observed for epochs 12–18 ( p = 0.005).

Results Interrelations between simulated incisor protrusion and the resulting soft-tissue changes were statistically highly significant ( p < 0.005) and nearly linear.

The results were highly significant (p < 0.005).

The main effect of testosterone was highly significant, F (1, 62) = 8.43, p = 0.005.

The levels of burden experienced by caregivers of patients undergoing PD were found to be significantly lower compared to caregivers of patients undergoing HD, as indicated by a highly significant statistical result (p < 0.005) [ 21 ].

Table 2 and Figure 2 provide further insight into intergroup comparisons of colorimetric parameters (L, a, and b) using ANOVA, showing a highly significant statistical difference (p<0.005) between GIC and composite groups.

2 ) from infected ( n = 4) and non-infected ( n = 8) animals revealed for EAAT2, GluA2, Shank3, and GABA A R α1 a highly significant main effect of infection status ( F 1,10 = 12.93; p = 0.005, two-way repeated measures ANOVA with protein as a within-subject factor and infection status as a between-subject factor) while no significant effect of protein or interaction was observed (all p > 0.804).

They obtained highly significant ( p < 0.005) discriminatory textural features between PDACs and pNETs, and their model correctly classified PDACs or pNETs in 75.8% of patients.

nebulosum , is excluded this difference is highly significant ( t = 3.583, d.f. = 6.354, p = 0.005).

All correlations yielded highly significant results at p <0.005.

We used FLIM-FRET analysis to measure the NDC80 binding in groups of sister kinetochores with similar K-K distances, and observed a highly significant positive correlation (p<0.005) between NDC80 FRET fraction and K-K distance ( Figure 3D ).

A highly significant increase in both the proportion and the absolute numbers of gamma/delta T cells (p < 0.005 and < 0.001, respectively, Student's t test) was observed in nonimmune P. vivax patients during clinical paroxysms compared to nonmalarial controls.

KPS < 70 was highly significant (median 4.2 versus 8.9 months, p = 0.005).

The decrease from baseline in plasma exosome levels at week 5 in patients with no evident disease was highly significant (**p < 0.005).

Analysis of specific transcripts showed that this was driven by one of its two protein-coding transcripts, ENST00000517894, which showed a highly significant difference (p = 0.005) and a 2-fold higher expression in the presence of the risk allele.

According to the independent sample t -test, all comparisons were determined to be highly significant ( p < 0.005).

Whereas there was no statistically significant difference in disease scores between iNOS KO and wild-type mice that did not receive IL-12 ( P = 0.74), scores of IL-12–treated iNOS KO and IL-12–treated wild-type mice differed at the highly significant probability value of P < 0.005.

The observed mean differences in cotinine levels in PICF between smokers and non‐smokers were, as expected, highly significant ( p < 0.005).

In the study conducted on Hamdani sheep (Koçyiğit, Demircioğlu, and Güzel 2024a ), the MWCC was calculated as 64.62 ± 3.90 mm in males and 60.26 ± 1.07 mm in females, and a highly significant statistical difference was found between the sexes ( p < 0.005).

This difference was highly significant considering the most accurate FrOr parameter (p<0.005).

As expected, time post-infection was a highly significant predictor of bacterial load after infection; each of the 10 bacteria proliferated over the course of infection ( Fig 3 , S2 Table ; ANOVA p < 0.005 in all cases).

Results There was a very highly significant ( p < 0.005) difference in E. faecalis count in all the groups on day 7 after placement of intracanal medicament, being highest in group IV followed by group II, group III, and group I.

As an example, in Figure 7B , we show analyses of the two genes CCNE1 and USH1C , demonstrating a highly significant change in skipping exon 9 or exon 11, respectively ( P values < 0.005).

For the highly significant miRNAs (59 miRNAs; p < 0.005) we performed a standard miEAA analysis using all pathways and categories and downloaded the results.

Differences were considered as “highly significant” in cases with p -values ≤ 0.005, as “significant” with p -values ≤ 0.05, as “borderline significant” with p -values between 0.05 and 0.1, and as “not significant” (n.s.) with p -values ≥ 0.1.