Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantp = 0.00580.1× alphaqualifiedgold
The correlation between the diversity of Mansonia and that of all Culicidae was positive, strong, and highly significant (p = 0.0058, Pearson’s r = 0.8668), even more than the correlation between Mansoniini and the total Culicidae diversity, which was also significant (p = 0.0129, Pearson’s r = 0.8194).
highly significantp = 5.8E-030.1× alphaqualifiedgold
Following corrections, PCT remained a highly significant predictor for secondary bacterial infection, positive blood (OR = 1.62, CI [1.15, 2.28], p = 5.8E-03) and sputum cultures (OR = 1.44, CI [1.10–1.89], p = 8.7E-03), as well as for ventilation (OR = 1.47, CI [1.22–1.77], p = 0.000039), death (OR = 1.39, CI [1.15–1.69], p = 0.00077), and ICU admission (OR = 1.48 CI [1.23–1.78], p = 0.000036) by day 28.
highly significantp = 0.00580.1× alphaqualifiedgold
ISCEV standard LA single flash (3 cd s m −2 , 2 Hz) analysis revealed a highly significant group effect for the b-wave amplitude [ F (1, 36.1) = 8.59, p = 0.0058] whereas age [ F (1, 30.3) = 1.23, p = 0.2764], eye [ F (1, 31) = 0.01, p = 0.9253], iris index [ F (1,50.5) = 0.25, p = 0.6177], and electrode distance [ F (1, 48.8) = 1.25, p = 0.2691] had no effect.
highly significantP = 0.0060.1× alphaqualifiedgold
We also verified that null distributions for the Pearson and Spearman correlation values for our main effect had means close to zero (Pearson r mean < 0.001, Spearman rho mean = 0.001) and that the correlation values observed for our main effect were highly significant compared to these null distributions (Pearson P = 0.006; Spearman P = 0.002; SI Appendix , Fig.
Sculpting new visual categories into the human brain.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A · 2024 · PMC11648923
highly significantP = 0.0060.1× alphaqualifiedgold
This shows that PACT is a harmless treatment, that does not damage the adjacent normal tissues.[ 31 ] It was observed that there was highly significant difference ( P = 0.006) among control and experimental group for aerobic bacterial count with 10 2 dilutions.
highly significantP =0.0060.1× alphaqualifiedgold
16 Although early results of the SYNTAX trial demonstrated no difference in mortality, 17 the most recent 5‐year follow‐up reports a highly significant difference in all‐cause death (9.2% versus 14.6%; P =0.006) as well as cardiac death (4.0% versus 9.2%; P <0.001), favoring CABG versus PCI in for patients with triple‐vessel disease.
highly significantp < 0.0060.1× alphaqualifiedgold
Moreover, pCPA treatment of the pregnant rats compared to saline treatment produced in offspring a highly significant decrease in duration of the second phase of the response to formalin, both in female pups (flexing+shaking, p < 0.006, Fig. 2 Aa; licking p < 0.002, Fig. 2 Ba) and male pups (flexing+shaking, p < 0.02, Fig. 2 , Ab; licking, p < 0.01, Fig. 2 , Bb).