Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantp value = 0.005380450.1× alphaqualifiedgold
In contrast, the reduction of NPTX1, NPTX2, and NPTXR showed a highly significant correlation with the clinical response to tofersen (NPTX1: Pearson's correlation = −0.54, p value = 0.00538045, adjusted R 2 = 0.26, 95% CI −0.77, −0.18; NPTX2: Pearson's correlation = −0.64, p value = 0.00059559, adjusted R 2 = 0.38, 95% CI −0.83, −0.33; NPTXR: Pearson's correlation = −0.53, p value = 0.00602491, adjusted R 2 = 0.25, 95% CI −0.77, −0.18; Fig. 6D–F ).
highly significantP = 0.00540.1× alphaqualifiedgold
The T levels of female fetuses were not associated with their father’s proportion in the litter (N = 47, F 1,44.68 = 0.003, P = 0.95), while the association for male fetuses was highly significant (N = 44, F 1,29.74 = 9.02, P = 0.0054) (Fig. 1 a).
highly significantp=0.00550.1× alphaqualifiedgold
This stunning difference in the numbers of sites of the three site classes were highly significant between intron 2 and the remaining part of the gene (χ 2 : p=0.0055, power=1.0000), and the differences between the subregions were also statistically significant (intron 2 vs. non-cds without intron 2, χ 2 : p=0.0106, power=1.0000, intron 2 vs. cds, χ 2 : p=0.0091, power=1.0000, cds and non-cds without intron 2, χ 2 : p=0.0423, power=0.9989).
highly significantp = 0.00560.1× alphaqualifiedgold
There were highly significant differences between the communities detected by the two methods (PERMANOVA, p = 0.0056). eDNA metabarcoding may reflect only part of the real benthic invertebrate community; however, it can be used to obtain the richness and abundance data of species that are difficult to identify morphologically, and these findings can be used to supplement morphological data.
highly significantP < 0.00560.1× alphaqualifiedgold
Analysis of the amount of variance explained by location was conducted, and most locations did not have significant differences in exposure ratings, while jobs had highly significant differences ( P < 0.0056) compared with location differences ( P < 0.05), suggesting a weaker effect of location in the analysis.
highly significantp = 0.00560.1× alphaqualifiedgold
Furthermore, adding 10 μL of αB7-H3-αCD3 BITE supernatant into PHA-L-activated T cells at E:T ratio of 10:1 resulted in highly significant cytotoxicity against L-363 (B7-H3 medium ; Fig. 8 C) and KMS-12-PE (B7-H3 high ; Fig. 8 D) cells, with percentages of 55.0 ± 5.2% ( p = 0.0056), 32.7 ± 4.4%, and ( p = 0.0067) compared to the negative controls (33.4 ± 2.0%, and 6.7 ± 3.0%, respectively).