“highly significant”

NSSI + BPD patients generally scored higher—in terms of total briefTEMPS-M score—than control participants (NSSI − BPD) and groups differed highly significant only in depressive temperament ( p = 0.007).

We therefore excluded it which rendered the correlation highly significant ( r = −0.5826 P = 0.007, Fig. 4 ).

For SSOSL85, the H10 model had a lower AIC value than the neutral model (H00), and the difference was highly significant (H10 vs H00, P = 0.007).

Statistical analysis demonstrated a highly significant association of Cathepsin D with poor prognostic variables including high tumour grade ( p < 0.007) and poor NPI ( p = 0.002).

Additionally, for the Papilionidae, we also discovered a highly significant positive association between Shannon diversity and species richness in both peri-urban and suburban areas ( p -values less than 0.001) and urban areas ( p = 0.007) ( Table 4 ).

Analysis of the correlation between the relative end joining efficiency of circular products measured by Southern blot and the number of generated colonies from in vitro end joining reactions mediated by CHO-K1, xrs5, XR-1, MO59K, and MO59J cells revealed a highly significant correlation ( P = 0.007) ( Figure 1E ).

The presence of DNET in 2/13 (15%) negative screens versus 2/348 (0.6%-Relative Risk of 0.004) with mutations is highly significant ( p = 0.007).

There was female preponderance (M:F; 1:1.97) among culture-positive cases and statistically highly significant (P=0.007).

There was also a highly significant difference in the intubation and mechanical ventilation between the two groups ( P = 0.007) as shown in Table 2 .

Although the association in our study did not reach statistical significance ( P = 0.086) in men, there was a highly significant trend across the total participants ( P = 0.007).

There was a highly significant difference in OS after allogeneic HSCT between pre-transplant MRD-positive and MRD-negative patients (estimated 5-year OS rates of 40 vs 89% P =0.007).

This increase was highly significant compared to the Medium group after 24 h (362 ± 66; P = 0·007), indicating that xenogeneic MNC‐sec induces secretion of rat AMPs in vivo (Fig. 4 ).

Thus, there was a highly significant difference between the asthmatics and controls ( P =0.007).

This difference is highly significant for a range of antibiotics, including gentamicin (P = 0.007), ceftazidime (P = 0.00001), aztreonam (P = 0.00009) and nalidixic acid (P = 0.0002) ( Table 7 ).

Using chi square, it was established that there was a highly significant statistical association between family income and use of traditional medicine (p =0.007).

However, a highly significant difference in CCT was observed between low and high degrees of myopia (one-way ANOVA, P=0.007, F=4.604).

The interaction between RTL and MDA was highly significant (Beta = 3.93, p = 0.007).

The correlation between the observed and predicted treatment outcomes was highly significant (r=0.58, p=0.007) ( figure 4C ), with statistical significance confirmed by permutation-based correction (p=0.009).

post DRibble-specific responses was highly significant (p=0.007).

A nonparametric Spearman analysis confirmed a highly significant positive correlation between the age in months and the number of sessions needed to C 1 (two-tailed Spearman’s correlation; n = 12, rho = 0.748, S = 72, p = 0.007, alpha = 0.05; Fig. 2 e).

This is opposite for Ma Sein CSV (highly significant with p = 0.007) and Sakta CSV where it indicated an increase in the ultra-poor households in 2020.

This analysis once again revealed a highly significant priming effect overall in the reduced data set ( F (1,12)=10.68, p =0.007) and an insignificant interaction effect between Group and the negative priming effect (although with a higher F -value than that found in the main analysis: F (1,12)=2.66 relative to F (1,30)=0.78).

A highly significant main effect of Stimulation ( F (1,18) = 9.415; p = 0.007) was found, with better performance during LGVS than during sham.

At 30 weeks, the clinical response rate reached 91.30% in group A and 56.52% in group B, a highly significant difference between the two groups (χ2 = 7.216, p = 0.007), further indicating that group A performed better than group B in terms of clinical response over time.

Relation between obesity marker levels and the POP concentration levels in fat In this paper, associations between expression of obesity markers (adiponectin, leptin, TNFα and PPARγ) and PCBs and PBDEs in adipose tissue are discussed ( Table 5 ), highly significant correlations (p≤0.007) are shown in scatter plots on Figure 2 .