“highly significant”

DJ-1 expression was linked to nodal status (P = 0.009), a highly significant association of DJ-1 expression with shortened patient overall survival (5-year survival rate 88.0% versus 53.9%; P = 0.007; log rank test) was demonstrated.

This is because there is a very highly significant negative relationship between (i) the ratio of overlap number to gene number and (ii) genome length (linear regression, r 2 = 0.21 and p = 0.007 in RNA viruses, r 2 = 0.42 and p < 0.001 in DNA viruses; electronic supplementary material, figure S8).

The subsequent analysis revealed a highly significant Sex × ADOS‐2 interaction for aggressive actions (IRR = 1.42, p = 0.007; Figure 3a , Table 2 ).

The association between age group and lung cancer knowledge score was highly significant ( P = 0.007).

The risk of eating disorders was positively associated with age and the correlation was highly significant (Spearman’s rho = 0.077, p = 0.007).

There was highly significant association between outcome of the patient (survival/non-survival) and severity of the CRP levels (Fisher's exact = 11.508, P = 0.007), d-Dimer levels (Pearson's Chi-square = 11.714, P = 0.008), serum ferritin levels (Pearson's Chi-square = 15.608, P = 0.001), and HRCT score (Fisher's exact = 18.694, P = 0.000).

Results Tregs from 62 preoperative CRC patients expressed a highly significant increase in levels of Foxp3 compared to healthy age-matched controls (p=0.007), which returned to normal after surgery (p=0.0075).

The overall score on the SALSEX scale between the baseline (5.4 ± 4.3) and follow-up visit (3.9 ± 3.6) was reduced in a highly significant way ( p = 0.007) ( Figure 1 ), showing a clinical improvement in the sexual function of patients who started treatment with desvenlafaxine at follow-up.

Statistical analysis confirmed that the reduction achieved by melanin was highly significant compared with the control (p = 0.007, Student’s t-test).

This difference is highly significant for a range of antibiotics, including gentamicin (P = 0.007), ceftazidime (P = 0.00001), aztreonam (P = 0.00009) and nalidixic acid (P = 0.0002) ( Table 7 ).

A global comparison between the satisfaction scales for both modules gives a highly significant difference, P =0.007.

The GCLC SNP (Single Nucleotide Polymorphism) rs1555903 also showed a highly significant ( p = 0.007) main effect on mercury retention in the umbilical cord in a UK birth cohort (Julvez et al., 2013 ).

As shown in Table 5 , transactional sex was highly significant with a p -value < 0.007, whilst variables age and condom use were significant at the 10% level, with p -values between 5% and 10%.

For the maxillary sinuses, a highly significant difference was present between the groups compared to the control group; all Rt and Lt maxillary sinuses showed complete recovery in the PEMF group ( p = 0.007). 4.

Mann Whitney analyses showed a highly significant correlation of gonadotropin-stimulated BTV with the presence of homozygous or hemizygous variants compared to heterozygous or WT patients ( p = 0.007 and p = 0.01 at 18 or 24 months, respectively) (Table 1 ).

In contrast, mitochondrial cosRNAs required an average of 14 ± 6 nt, a highly significant difference ( P = 0.007; two-tailed unpaired Student's t -test).

Resolute Integrity, the differences were highly significant ( p = 0.007).

However, on days 2 and 3, the capsules produced much larger increases in milk volume, which were highly significant (day 2, 66.2 ml, p = 0.007; day 3, 199.5 ml, p = 0.000) [ 58 ].

However after surgery, RM-ANOVA revealed a highly significant main effect of treatment group on path length during reversal trials (F 1,21 = 8.7, p = 0.007), which demonstrated that MWM reversal was markedly impaired in mice with mPFC lesions.

Patients treated for hypertension showed a significant positive trend (p = 0.02), and the difference in trends was highly significant (p = 0.007), a result shown in Figure 1 .

S2 ); collapsing the data across sex, the strain interaction was also highly significant ( F 13,247 =2.3, P =0.007).

A definitive diagnosis was reached in 33/49 malignant, 7/7 intermediate, and 9/10 benign tumors ( P = 0.007 which was highly significant).

This analysis once again revealed a highly significant priming effect overall in the reduced data set ( F (1,12)=10.68, p =0.007) and an insignificant interaction effect between Group and the negative priming effect (although with a higher F -value than that found in the main analysis: F (1,12)=2.66 relative to F (1,30)=0.78).

This difference was highly significant [72.3 (31.3–288.6) versus 7.4 (0.0–20.1) min per recording day, P = 0.007, n = 20, Mann–Whitney rank sum test].

In step 3, the full model was highly significant (adjusted R 2 = 0.353, F = 5.361, P = 0.007).