GP showed highly significant positive correlations ( p < 0.01) with GR, GI, VI, shoot fresh weight (SFW), and shoot dry weight (SDW), indicating that a higher GP reflects an enhanced early germination and seedling vigor under alkaline stress.
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
Alpha diversity and the relative abundance of bacteria for statistics were analyzed with one-way ANOVA by the SPSS21 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA); differences were considered as significant at p < 0.05 and highly significant at p < 0.01.
The differences in pH (45mIn, 24h), cooking loss and shear were highly significant ( p < 0.01) in yaks of group F compared to group Y.
Highly significant associations (Wilcoxon test, P < 0.01) were observed between both Hap1 and Hap2 within each candidate gene and the phenotype ( Figures 5A,B ). 4 Discussion In this study, a RIL population derived from a cross between the wild soybean ZYD02878 and the cultivated soybean Zhongdou 41 was subjected to multi-environment phenotypic evaluation.
The difference between wild type and Δfum strains is insignificant (compare the two left bars of Figure 1Ci and Figure 1Cii ) while the difference between these strains following DNA damage is highly significant (bars 4 and 5, p<0.01).
Notably, genes such as VCAM1 , CX3CL1 , CHN1 , MPZL1 and STMN2 exhibited highly significant differences ( P < 0.01), as presented in Fig. 4b .
Highly significant differences (raw P < 0.01) were found after the 3rd boost for C2.2 (MVA+MVAgp140 and MVA+gp120 > MVA only) and after the 2nd boost for C5.1 (MVA+MVAgp140 > MVA only and MVA+gp120) and C5.2 (MVA+MVAgp140 > MVA only) ( Fig. 3C and Table 2 ).
Regression analysis generated the following quadratic polynomial equation: Y = 21.83 − 0.7314 × A − 0.6930 × B − 0.8540 × C + 0.0606 × A B − 0.3878 × A C − 0.7949 × B C − 3.49 × A 2 − 0.9715 × B 2 − 0.7763 × C 2 Analysis of variance showed that the model was highly significant (p < 0.01), while the lack of fit was not significant (p = 0.1564), indicating that the model was suitable for describing and optimizing the wine-steaming process of D huoshanense ( Table 4 ).
p -values were further classified as significant ( p <.05), highly significant ( p <.01), and extremely significant ( p <.001).
The results of simple correlation analysis showed that commission errors and ICV showed a highly significant negative correlation with 5-ht content changes ( p < 0.01 ).
Statistical differences were considered significant when p < .05 (*), highly significant when p < .01 (**). 3.
Chi‐square test result showed a highly significant correlation between the expression of CD11b and aseptic loosening ( P < 0.01).
A 1.5-fold change expression cut-off for ratio experiments was applied together with anti-correlation of ratio profiles, rendering the microarray analysis highly significant (p < 0.01), robust, and reproducible.
The differences in biochemical characteristics of Sanguisorba minor genotypes were found to be highly significant ( p ≤ 0.01).
P value was also highly significant (p < 0.01).
All comparisons were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05 and highly significant at P < 0.01.
Differences were determined to be significant at P < 0.05 and highly significant at P < 0.01.
The interaction between protein and fat had a highly significant effect on firmness, adhesiveness, WHC, apparent viscosity, L*, and d(0.5) with p < 0.01 that is presented and discussed in the results section. 3 Results and discussion 3.1 Total solids and major components (protein, fat and sugars) of almond yoghurts The protein, fat and sugar contents in the yoghurt formulations ( Table 1 ) were measured and presented in ( Table 2 ).
Detection of Cardiovascular Autonomic Neuropathy and Vagal Heart Rate Variability Indexes Interestingly, all the markers of vagal heart rate modulations, i.e., pNN50+ and pNN50−, RMSSD, and HF power, were characterized by a highly significant “Group” factor ( p < 0.01).
It can be seen that the differences were significant ( p < 0.05) or highly significant ( p < 0.01) except at 1 h and 4 h when the differences were not significant.
Conversely, lncRNA106907 knockdown led to a highly significant reduction in LPIN1 mRNA expression ( P < 0.01), and significantly decreased the mRNA levels of DGAT2, FASN, SREBF1, ACLY, APOB, MTTP, PPARα , and ACACA ( P < 0.05), with no significant change in SCD expression ( Fig. 6 H).
Statistical differences were considered significant at p value < 0.05 and highly significant at p value < 0.01.
Results Physiological traits Photosynthetic rate According to the combined ANOVA (Table 2 ), the effects of location, fertilizer, and spraying were highly significant ( p ≤ 0.01).
The path coefficient of “digitalized communication” to “effectiveness” is highly significant (0.215; p < 0.01), which supports H1.
proved a statistically highly significant ( p < 0.01) decrease in inflammation-associated molecules (CRP, HO-1, IL-6, IL-1β, TNF-α) after the procedure with no statistically significant differences between the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy [ 16 ].