“highly significant”

A comparison of median survival between radiation alone and radiation in combination with MCT4 depletion was found also to be highly significant (log-rank ** P < .01).

A comparative study of the stoichiometric characteristics of N, P, C, N:P, C:N, and C: P among fish with different diets showed that in the upstream reservoir area, there were no significant differences in N and C: N content among omnivorous, carnivorous, and filter-feeding fish ( P > 0.05), while significant or highly significant differences were observed in P (F = 6.589, P < 0.01), C (F = 8.069, P < 0.01), N: P (F = 4.101, P < 0.05), and C: P (F = 11.157, P < 0.01) among fish with different diets.

The statistical differences between the tested samples were classified as significant (0.01≤ P <0.05), highly significant (0.001≤ P <0.01), and very highly significant ( P < 0.001).

Phenotypic Analysis of Salinity Tolerance Analysis of Variance and Mean Performance of the Studied Traits The analysis of variance revealed highly significant ( p < 0.01) differences for the 13 measured traits among the wheat genotypes in the control and salinity treatments.

Results and discussion Estimations obtained through the Fully Modified Ordinary Least Squares (FMOLS) and the Dynamic Ordinary Least Squares (DOLS) regressions produced a negative and highly significant ( p ≤ 0.01) coefficient for the determinant ‘births attended by skilled healthcare staff’ (Supplementary Table S2).

ANOVA for years revealed highly significant differences ( P <0.01) (see Table 1 at Dryad).

5A ), one of which was highly significant ( p <0.01).

In this study, Pillai’s trace was highly significant ( p < 0.01), confirming the validity of RCCA. 2.2.4.

The results of the between-subjects effect test, simple effect analysis ( Tables 2 – 4 ), and pairwise comparative analysis of the tennis players’ reaction time when making a stroke landing prediction showed that the main effect of sport level was highly significant [ F (1,42) = 307.854, p < 0.01, η 2 = 0.880].

Model 2 was overall highly significant ( Fig 2C ; p < 0.01) with an accuracy of 76.7% ( Fig 2B ).

Differences and correlations were considered statistically significant if p < 0.05 and highly significant if p < 0.01.

The result for Bartlett’s test of sphericity was 1309.308, which was highly significant ( P < 0.01).

There was a highly significant negative correlation between the major diameter of the tibia (LD) and total calcium content (Ca) (r = 0.71, P < 0.01).

Whilst both genotype groups showed greater BMI values in urban populations, the non-risk (AA) genotypes showed a highly significant increase BMI value in urban areas (Mean difference = 2.2 kgm −2 (95%CI 0.5–3.9), p < 0.01) whilst the risk genotypes (GG + AG) showed an increase which was marginally insignificant (BMI difference = 0.8 kgm −2 (95%CI − 0.1–1.7), p = 0.08).

ANOVA showed that inoculation size and fermentation temperature significantly affected TP yield ( P < 0.05), while fermentation time had a highly significant effect ( P < 0.01).

The HSS scores exhibited a highly significant difference in the NMT group (P<0.01).

2 , Table S2 ), and differences among genotypes were highly significant ( p < 0.01) for all traits, except for mean nodule DM (Table 2 ).

Water use efficiency for each interval (WUEn) calculated using Equation 2 exhibited highly significant sensitivity at S1, S3, S4, and S6 (p< 0.01).

Propionate levels showed a highly significant treatment effect ( p < 0.01), with means ranging from 151 to 172 mmol/mol.

However, there is a highly significant linear correlation between amounts of ribose and glucose and the rising concentrations of norharman ( r = 0.92, p < 0.01 and r = 0.98, p < 0.001, respectively) and harman ( r = 0.98, p < 0.001 and r = −0.72, p < 0.05, respectively).

To filter these TF- coexpression modules, each was subjected to a cis-regulatory motif analysis using RcisTarget (SCENIC) and only modules with a highly significant motif enrichment ( P < 0.01) were retained for further analysis and pruned of indirect targets lacking motif enrichment.

The highly significant environmental effects ( P < 0.01) for all traits assayed except for yield, ASI, PASP, and EPP under drought and DS, ASI, and EPP under optimal conditions indicated that the research environments in Nigeria varied in terms of climatic and edaphic conditions.

Combined analysis also revealed that variances due to genotypes, site, management, and genotype × management were highly significant ( P < 0.01).

Key Soil Factors Influencing GHG Emissions Soil CO 2 emissions and CH 4 consumption both had positive and highly significant correlations with SWC, SOC, MBC and TDN (all p < 0.01) as well as MBC/SOC ( p < 0.05), and had negative correlations with DOC/SOC and DOC/TDN (both p < 0.01, Table 2 ).

In correlation analyses between bacterial/fungal species richness and maize yield components, bacterial and fungal richness exerted a highly significant positive effect on maize yield (p<0.01), suggesting that a favorable microbial environment promotes maize yield.