“highly significant”

Studies show significant improvements in pulmonary capacity among boys and girls aged 9–10 after a 12-week shuttlecock intervention in schools ( P < 0.05), with highly significant differences before and after the experiment ( P < 0.01) ( Xiaobei, 2022 ).

The difference between all proportions was highly significant ( P < 0.01 and P < 0.0001, resp.), meaning that HPV prevalence in pregnant women is dependent on geographical or ethnical parameters, with pregnant women from USA and Latin America having the highest HPV prevalence reported.

Differences were considered significant at P < 0.05, highly significant at P < 0.01, and very highly significant at P < 0.001 and P < 0.0001.

the comparison of algal surface/seawater yielded a highly significant (p < 0.01) F value (16.24).

In both years, the main effects of entry and system were highly significant ( P < 0.01) and in 2019 considerably larger than interaction ( Supplementary Table 6 ), warranting a closer look at the main effects.

SIMPROF plot expressed interconnections and highly significant correlation (Pi = 0.813, p <0.01), signifying genuine relationship between the contaminants (Fig.

Similarly, Fu’s FS was negative and highly significant (P<0.01) for all the studied breeds.

For pro-inflammatory cytokines ( TNF and IL1B ), both main effects and interaction effects were highly significant ( P < 0.01; Fig. 5 c).

Conversely, the testes coefficient demonstrated a highly significant decrease (P < 0.01), while the epididymides coefficient, despite displaying a decreasing trend, did not reach statistical significance (P > 0.05).

A highly significant difference in the Simpson index was observed by the rank-sum test ( p < 0.01).

Single applications at 100 and 200 kg N ha−1 demonstrated highly significant timing effects (P < 0.01) , with GPC exhibiting an opposite response pattern to yield.

polyphylla demonstrated a highly significant negative correlation with the abundance of Ascomycota ( R = −0.8815, P < 0.01), while showing significant positive correlations with Mortierellomycota ( R = 0.7120), Rozellomycota ( R = 0.6781), Aphelidiomycota ( R = 0.8001), and Monoblepharomycota ( R = 0.6809).

Regarding the overall sample, the Spearman rank correlation proves a highly significant relation between the score of the Correction scale and the parameter value of the other validity scales or that of the Dissimulation Index, respectively (all p≤0.01 between the K- and the F-scale with correlation coefficient (r)=–0.51; between the L-scale and the F-scale with (r)=–0.29 and between the Dissimulation Index (F-K) and the F-scale with (r)=0.71).

Although the direction changes, it remains highly significant statistically (P < 0.01).

EGCG supplementation levels from 0.05 to 0.5 g/kg in the diet showed highly significant ( P < 0.01) quadratic effects on Val, Ile, Leu, Met, Thr, Lys, His, Arg, Asp, Glu, Gly, Ala, Ser, and Tyr contents.

A scatter plot and bivariate correlation analysis of the HSI and FTND scores of current smokers revealed a strong linear correlation between them (r = 0.933), and this was highly significant ( P value < 0.01) [ Figure 1 ].

The relative abundance of Saccharimonadales exhibited a highly significant negative correlation with yield ( p < 0.01) ( Figure 7 a).

Significance of Effects from Analysis of Intervals For the analysis of health treatment cost by interval within lactation, the fixed effects of herd, interval, and the interaction of herd and interval were all highly significant ( p < 0.01) in first parity for each category of health treatment cost as well as TOT.

The least significant difference test was implemented for multiple comparisons (* p < 0.05, significant; ** p < 0.01, highly significant).

Differences were considered significant at * p < 0.05, highly significant at ** p < 0.01, and extremely significant for *** p < 0.001. 3.

2 B: i vs ii), (B) No difference between EV and control (iii vs iv), and (C) A highly significant difference (p < 0.01) between B360 and its control (v vs vi).

Relative reliability was highly significant and satisfactory ( r = 0.59, p < .01).

The results are given in Table 2. Compared to the laboratory control (0.46 x 10-3), the investigated population of Elbmarsch showed a highly significant elevation of dicentric chromosomes, with a rate of 1.77x 10-3 dicentric chromo- somes/metaphase [p< 0.01 (10)].

Cell death induced by treatment with apatinib plus radiotherapy was significantly more pronounced than treatment with radiotherapy alone in Calu-1 cells; however, this treatment-related difference in cell death was not found in A549 cells, which makes the difference between Calu-1 and A549 cells in this regard highly significant ( P <0.01).

The results, visualized in box plots, exhibited that LGALS3 displayed an extremely significant difference in expression ( p < 0.001), IGF1, SOX2, and KL exhibited highly significant differences ( p < 0.01), and ID1 and WNT2 showed significant differences ( p < 0.05) (Fig. 5 A; Table 3 ).