“highly significant”

ANOVA results showed that the differences among RILs of mapping population were highly significant for both traits ( p < 0.01, Table S3 ).

Differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05 and highly significant at p < 0.01.

There is a highly significant statistical connection between the number of people in waiting rooms and the energy equivalent sound level L Aeq (Spearman ρ = 0.485, p < 0.01).

So proliferation in the three test antigens taken together is higher in group C than A1 and in group A day 57 than A day 1, and in both cases the difference is highly significant ( P < 0.01).

cordifolia treatment resulted in a highly significant increase in SOD activity when compared to the diabetes control group in both tissues (F 4.35 = 336.1964, p < 0.01 in brain; F 4.35 = 821.295, p < 0.01, in sciatic nerve) that inhibits the excessive release of free radicals in tissues and prevents further damage ( Figure 5 and Figure 6 ).

Furthermore, based on the correlation analysis, the content of regaloside A and regaloside K have a highly significant effect on the color change (ΔE) of lily bulbs ( p < 0.01), which showed a positive correlation with brightness, but a negative correlation with a* value.

Genotype, environment and GEI effects were highly significant ( P ≤ 0.01) for the assessed traits.

MDA was found to have a highly significant negative correlation with SOD, chlorophyll a (Chla), chlorophyll b (Chlb), and total chlorophyll (Chl (a+b)) ( P < 0.01).

This difference was highly significant (p < 0.01).

Meanwhile, A, B, C, D, BC, A 2 , B 2 , C 2 , and D 2 exerted highly significant effects on yield ( p < 0.01) and AB a significantly effect ( p < 0.05).

Results The clinical parameters were found to be improved after one month of periodontal therapy, with the statistical difference in the mean values of the BI and PD being highly significant (P < 0.01), while the statistical differences concerning the PI and CAL were significant (P < 0.05).

Multivariable mixed effects modelling All candidate variables highly significant ( p < 0.01) in the single variable analysis were considered for inclusion in a multivariable model using a forward-stepwise approach based on hypothesized impact on transmission.

Lowercase letters indicate significant difference ( P < 0.05); uppercase letters indicate highly significant difference ( P < 0.01).

1,25(OH) 2 D3 and 20,23(OH) 2 D3 were the most effective in inhibiting proliferation of K562 human myeloid leukemia while slightly lower (p<0.05) but highly significant inhibition was seen for 20(OH)D3 (p<0.01) ( Fig. 2B ) ( Table S1B ). 1,20(OH) 2 D3 and pL were least potent, and 7DHP, 20(OH)7DHP and 20(OH)pD had no effect on these cells ( Table S1B ).

Spatiotemporal parameters such as total weight transfer, step cycle duration, double stance duration, step length, gait cycle length, foot angle, and cadence values were highly significant in both operated and non-operated extremities after arthroscopic surgery (p<0.01).

On the contrary, blackcurrant had a highly significant influence on the five vineyards with a 99% confidence level ( p < 0.01) that means blackcurrant made a very different contribution among these vineyards.

The effects of linear term A and the interaction terms AD, BC, and BE on the FRAP are highly significant ( p < 0.01).

The ANOVA for beta power obtained during the d2-R test showed highly significant main effects for the factors working environment, F (1,19) = 8.45, p = 0.01, η p 2 = 0.25, and time, F (1,19) = 8.37, p = 0.01, η p 2 = 0.22.

Under shaking conditions ( Figure 4 b), the results showed their highest proliferation rate on day 10 when bFGF free (OD 450 = 0.225), while they reached their peak on day 15 with bFGF (OD 450 = 0.592), which presents a highly significant difference ( p < 0.01).

In column 2, we note that POPULATION it is highly significant (p<0.01), while PerCapitaGDP t is borderline significant (p<0.12).

The increasing trend is statistically highly significant for most sites in the East ( p value < 0.01) and significant for most sites in the middle ( p value < 0.05).

Variables that were found to be highly significant (p<0.01) included Tm, probe length, GC content, presence of a SNP, average heterozygosity of a SNP, polyA, polyC, polyG, and polyT.

The symbols used to denote significance levels in the results are as follows [ Tables 1 - 3 ]: * = Statistically significant difference ( P < 0.05) ** = Statistically highly significant difference ( P < 0.01) # = Nonsignificant difference ( P < 0.05).

The effects of irrigation treatments and nitrogen doses on ADF, NDF, ADL, crude fiber, crude ash and crude protein contents were found to be highly significant ( P ≤ 0.01).

Both GLS1 and GLS2 exhibited markedly higher expression in cancer tissues with a highly significant difference ( P <.01), highlighting alterations in glutamine utilization in tumor cells In addition, GLUT-1, showed significantly elevated levels in cancer tissues ( P ≤.01), indicating an increase in glucose uptake by tumor cells.