“highly significant”

Table 4 contained the C statistics of 16 significantly different serological parameters, among which five parameters, specifically TP, ALB, Ca, FIB, and sIgA, with the additional manifestation were highly significant variables ( P < 0.01). sIgA, ALB, and Ca had the top three diagnostic levels (i.e. 75.6, 72.7, and 71.8%) between IgAN and non-IgAN (Figure 1 ).

The Fisher's exact test statistic was highly significant ( P < 0.01) across all 16 SAT family comparisons between EsCM and CTRL samples.

The percentage of FluoroGold-positive neurons was 28.8 ± 4.5% and 26 ± 3.5%, respectively, in the saline and GFP animals versus 11.77 ± 1.6% in the SCYL1BP1-injected animals ( Figure 6, B and C ); this difference was highly significant ( t test, p < 0.01).

As expected, we observed strong activation of IFN-β , IFN-λ1 and ISG54 genes in response to 88-bp dsRNA with highly significant (p<0.01) difference compared to all other treatments in both HaCaT and U373MG cell lines at almost all time points ( Figure 2 ).

Treatments were considered significantly different if p<0.05 *, highly significant if p<0.01 * *, or extremely significant if p<0.001 * * *.

There was either a significant decrease in the TNF- α production of group treated with 62.5 μ g/mL EAAC ( P < 0.05), or highly significant decrease of groups treated, respectively, with 125 and 250 μ g/mL of EAAC when compared with the LPS-alone group ( P < 0.01 or P < 0.001).

In contrast, men have a disadvantage compared with the reference sample (-0.337) that is highly significant for the workload variable (p < 0.01) as well as for the ‘salaried activity’ variable (p < 0.05).

The MANOVA revealed a highly significant effect for the group variable (Hotellings’ T 2 = 0.80, p < 0.01).

Difference between groups was considered highly significant (**) when p≤ 0.01 and significant (*) when p≤ 0.05.

Linear regression (log 2 (volume) = 1.85 + 2.43 log 2 (valve dimension); N = 596) was highly significant (p < 0.01) and explained 92% of variance ( Supplementary Fig.

AFP level was monitored and its reduction from baseline (before treatment) to the end of radiotherapy resulted highly significant for the entire cohort of patients (20% reduction, p<0.01).

No significant difference for turbidity was seen with respect to seasons and months P ≥ 0.05, whereas highly significant difference was recorded for sites P < 0.01 and the R for the 3 stations was 0.41.

Examination of these coefficients with a T- test shows that the percentage yield of NUCF ( Y 1 ), percentage of MUFA (OA) ( Y 3 ), percentage of PUFA (LA) ( Y 4 ), the linear term of urea-to-FAs ratio ( X 1 ) and quadratic term of urea-to-FAs were highly significant ( p < 0.01), while the percentage of SFAs ( Y 2 ), the linear term was significant at p < 0.05.

Groups B and D were similar (p = 0.396), and the differences between all other group pairs were highly significant (all p<0.01).

Mean differences were considered significant (P<0.05) and highly significant (P<0.01).

Differences were considered significant if P<0.05 and highly significant if P<0.01.

This “near rescue” of the mCMV-induced pathology of NB + 6 SMGs with GEF inhibition of EGFR phosphorylation is coincident with reduced mCMV infection compared to un-treated SMGs (compare Figure 2 G to F), as well as a highly significant (p<0.01) decline in downstream pERK protein expression (compare Figure 4 C to B; Figure 5 A).

As shown in Figure 4A , when stimulated with PEDV-S1 protein at 28 dpi, the proliferation levels of spleen T lymphocytes from mice injected with pIRES-(TGEV-S1-PEDV-S1) and pIRES-(PEDV-S1) were increased compared to those of control cells and the increase was highly significant (p<0.01).

With respect to the follow-up care after PE there was a highly significant difference concerning blood pressure measurement three months postpartum (p<0.01).

At 4 h through 48 h post-infection, internal growth of the mutants was found to be highly significant ( p -value < 0.01).

showed a highly significant decrease ( P < 0.01) in both body and liver weight when compared to control group- I, while a significant decrease ( P < 0.05) in liver weight was observed in group- IV [ Table 1 ].

Difference between variables was considered as nonsignificant with P value >0.05, significant at P value >0.05, highly significant at P value >0.01, and very highly significant at P value >0.001.

In fact, the correlation between the microarray gene expression intensities and the qPCR normalized C T values was statistically highly significant for genes such as Fgf2 ( r = 0.64, p<0.01) and Adcy1 ( r = 0.73, p<0.01) ( Fig. 10B ).

While this is a lower number of pathogen enriched gene families than was found when including only the IMPACT strains in the analysis (Figure 7 ), it still represents a highly significant gene set (p < 0.01, Additional file 1 : Figure S9).

Difference was highly significant at P <0.01.