Specifically, its intercept was highly significant ( p = 9.32 × 10 −7 ).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
MANOVA results on the PC scores were highly significant, highlighting the substantial differences between the morphological characters of the two species ( α < 0.001; P = 9.38e-07).
In contrast, the SLA measurements showed highly significant differences ( p = 9.47 × 10 −7 ) Figure 5 , with pairwise comparisons revealing significant differences between T1 and T2 ( p = 0.0000096) and between T2 and T3 ( p = 0.0004509), but no difference between T1 and T3 ( p = 0.5129).
The set of 495 genes overlapped between T98G and SK-N-SH cells showed a highly significant relationship with “Mitochondrial dysfunction” ( P = 9.53E-07), while the set of 196 genes identified only in T98G were less significantly related to “Mitochondrial dysfunction” ( P = 3.90E-03).
As expected, the difference in reporter expression between putative enhancers and negative control regions is highly significant ( P = 9.6 × 10 −7 by two-tailed t -test) ( Fig. 4B ).
A one-sided student T comparison of log-converted molar N/P ratios showed highly significant differences (p = 9.70 × 10 −7 ) between bacteria (geometric mean = 21.0, median = 23.3 mol N / mol P) and viruses (geometric mean = 9.25, median = 9.45 mol N / mol P), respectively.
At the genus level ( Supplementary Figure S3A ), the α-diversity pattern mirrored that of the species level, with all indices showing highly significant overall intergroup differences (Kruskal-Wallis test: all χ 2 ≥ 27.674, P ≤ 9.79 × 10 −7 ).
The results indicated that a cluster of highly significant SNPs represented by Chr2_67754173 ( p = 9.85 × 10 −7 ) was located downstream of Chr2T10180100, a gene encoding an LTP protein.
Specifically, the evidence grading criteria were as follows: If the association was supported by a highly significant random-effects ( P < 10−6, a threshold considered to substantially reduce false positive findings) 10 – 13 , a sample size of more than 1000 cases, P < 0.05 in the largest study, I2 < 50%, absence of small study effects, a PI excluding the null, no evidence of excess significance bias, and P < 0.05
The vaginal shortening, mucosal atrophy, and bleedings were highly significant ( p < 0.000001) in the 5.0-Gy group after 5 years.
The difference between AD and HC was 64.47% with 95% confidence interval from 56.87% to 72.08%, and it was highly significant ( P < 0.000001).
Even after accounting for phylum identity, the clustering was still highly significant (PERMANOVA P < 10 −6 ).
This highly significant difference (2.1-fold; P ≤ 10 −6 ) suggests that some of the low-scoring sites might be false positives of the ChIP approach and that the overall prediction performance might have been underestimated.
All results were highly significant with p < 0.000001 for all values.
These studies reported robust sample sizes, highly significant p -values ( p < 10−6), and statistically significant results in the largest included studies.
In all cases, the difference in the level of divergence between normal and tumor samples in each tissue and platform cohort is highly significant (Wilcoxon P value < 10 − 6 ; see Fig. 2 ).
3 for presentation of results) the region was also found to be highly significant ( p < 10 –6 , R 2 adjusted = 0.8).
Differences between populations accounted for only 6.96% of the variance, but was highly significant ( P < 1.0 * 10 −6 ).
A total of 151 genes were regulated by hypoxia in both datasets (Figure 1D ), and a permutation test revealed such an overlap between the two datasets was highly significant ( P < 1 × 10 −6 ; Supplementary Figure S1B ).
It is important that Thioalkalivibrio , Pediococcus , and Faecalibaculum showed highly significant disparities (FDR-adjusted p < 1.0 × 10 −6 ).
Note that the difference in PS rates is highly significant ( P < 10 −6 ). 10 μg of protein isolated at 1 h was processed by 8%PAGE/SDS for fluorographic auradiography with PPO.
SNP with call rates < 0.98, minor allele frequencies (MAF) < 0.03 and highly significant deviations ( P < 10 -6 ) from Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE) were also excluded.
In this study, a highly significant ( P < 10 −6 ) and consistent decline was observed with the frequency of consumption. 250 Similarly, another case-control study in Puerto Rico ( n = 314) found that consumption of sofrito (a diet based on garlic and onion) was inversely associated with the occurrence of BC.
Notably, the TCT:M2TAM ratio was highly significant ( p ≤ 0.000001) in two HGSOC cohorts.
[ 7 the correlation between nodularity and infection is highly significant (p<0.000001).