Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantP < 0.0000010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Significant differences were observed between the SIDS and non-SIDS groups: the presence of thymic petechiae in SIDS (89.5%) compared with non-SIDS (47.7%) was highly significant ( P < 0.000001; OR 9.38 (CL 4.5 to 19.9), and their absence was more frequent in non-SIDS (52.3%) compared with SIDS cases (10.4%) ( P < 0.000001).
highly significantP< 10-60.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In such a comparison (Figure 1) it will be observed that the distributions appear quite different; the mean AFTPs have a highly significant difference (t = 10.6, P< 10-6, d.f. = 1.721).
Inheritance and testicular cancer.
Br J Cancer · 1995 · PMC2033581
highly significantP < 10−60.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Specifically, the evidence grading criteria were as follows: If the association was supported by a highly significant random-effects ( P < 10−6, a threshold considered to substantially reduce false positive findings) 10 – 13 , a sample size of more than 1000 cases, P < 0.05 in the largest study, I2 < 50%, absence of small study effects, a PI excluding the null, no evidence of excess significance bias, and P < 0.05
highly significantp<1e-60.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Velocity-dependent increase of the MEG gamma response frequency Consistent with our previous results [ 35 ] and those of other research groups [ 36 , 76 ], we observed a strong and highly significant increase in GR frequency with increasing velocity of visual motion in the combined TD and ASD sample (F (2, 80) = 149, epsilon = 0.70, adjusted p<1e-6, partial eta-squared = 0.79).
highly significantp < 10−60.0× alphaqualifiedgold
3 Results 3.1 Evaluation of the Visual Screening Test as Early Reading Predictor 3.1.1 Correlations Between Percentile at the Visual Search Screening Test Performed in Kindergarten and Z‐Score of 3rd Grade Reading Efficiency Figure 3 displays the correlation for the full sample (gathering children assessed at 3, 4, and 5 years old and categorized in percentiles) which appeared highly significant (r = −0.24, p < 10−6, n = 494).
highly significantp < 10 −60.0× alphaqualifiedgold
An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses evaluating the association between environmental risk factors and AD showed that late-life depression and type 2 diabetes mellitus are the most significant; cancer, depression at any age, and physical activity are also highly significant ( p < 10 −6 ) in AD development.