“highly significant”

All the relations were found to be highly significant (p = 0.000).

This overlap is highly significant ( P ‐value = 0) when compared to a random scenario.

Moreover, the correlation coefficient of the sequencing data and qRT-PCR result using β-actin as reference gene reached 0.992 (R 2 = 0.984) ( Figure 6 ), which was highly significant ( p < 0.000).

The overall fitted model was highly significant as the coefficient of covariance parameter indicated the p-value = 0.000.

There was a highly significant relationship between pleural fluid, TTF-1, and lung adenocarcinoma (p=0.000).

These results were calculated using the Wald method with continuity correction factor and were highly significant due to the large number of people sampled ( P < 0.0000).

The differences in fentanyl requirements between two groups were highly significant ( P < 0.00).

Firstly, general linear mixed effects modeling with a binomial link function indicated a highly significant effect of both disambiguating sensory evidence (z = 45.55; p = 0) and perceptual history (z = 28.51; p = 8.62 × 10 − 179 ), while controlling for the within-participant correlations using random intercepts.

The results ( Figure 3 a) indicate that storage time, BHA concentration and thyme waste extract concentration in the emulsions had highly significant effects ( p = 0.000000), and exerted great influence on the peroxide formation, whereas almond oil (L) and (Q) percentage in the emulsion did not produce a significant effect ( p > 0.05).

Pearson correlation between respective first and second measurements was highly significant at the 0.01 level ( P = 0.000); Pearson r is 0.930 for MD width and 0.980 for BL width.

Comparisons of PANSS scores before and after antipsychotic treatment in RTG and TATG Time point (baseline, and after 4 or 12 weeks of treatment) was the within-subject factor, and time point × group (RTG and TATG) was the between-subject factor, in a repeated measures ANOVA, which revealed a highly significant main effect of time period for total PANSS score ( F =420, df =2, P =0.000), positive symptom score ( F =213, df =2, P =0.000, η 2 =0.30), negative symptom score ( F =186, df =2, P =0.000, η 2 =0.23), and total psychopathology score ( F =167, df =2, P =0.000, η 2 =0.19).

A two-way ANOVA including year, transects, and interaction between years 1996 and 2012 with transects as predictors, was highly significant ( R a d j . 2 = 0 . 45 , F 5,50 = 10.07, p < 0.000).

A 3% increment in FEV 1 was reported for Group I subjects (SF) and was highly significant statistically ( t = −8.833, P = 0.000) at 95% CI.

The results in Table 6 indicate that all factors and interaction effects are highly significant ( p < 0.000) except for V 2 *V 2 with p < 0.005.

In the 10 mM experiment, by chance bees in the PB treatment group performed better during the second training trial than control bees for discrimination learning ( p = 0.048), however in the test there was a highly significant difference in the opposite direction ( p = 0.000), therefore this chance difference does not seem to have had any lasting effect.

A highly significant, positive correlation was observed between poor sleep quality and fatigue levels (r = 0. 426, at p = 0.000) .

Risk score The risk score calculated according to the method described above had a mode of 0, a median of 1, a mean of 1.21, and a maximum of 8 for all 1672 persons and correlated highly significant and negative (Spearman correlation 0.41 p < 0.000) with the BMI.

The analysis revealed that the feeding method itself had a highly significant impact ( p = 0.000), confirming that IOF is associated with reduced hospital stays.

All correlation coefficients are highly significant ( p -value = 0) and results from both datasets are highly similar.

6.2.1 Direct effects of the pandemic lockdown on CSC The latent regression coefficients for the influence of the pandemic on consciousness of ecologically (ECO) and socially (SOC) sustainable consumption as well as of voluntary simplicity (SIMP) were negative and highly significant ( ß ECO = −0.109, ß SOC = −0.067, ß SIMP = −0.178; p < 0.000; see Table 2 ).

The results showed highly significant QFO - > EWA (β = 0.640, T-stat = 14.077, p > 0.000).

Statistical significance was considered at P-value<0.05 and highly significant at P-value<0.00.

Results: All the periodontal parameters were statistically highly significant ( P = 0.00) amongst H, E and L groups and between responders and non-responders.

Meanwhile, the pairwise homoplasy index (PHI) [ 40 ] statistic provided highly significant evidence for recombination within M. luteus species ( p = 0.00).

In this case, the test statistics are highly significant (p = 0.0000).