The influence of institutional and personal profiles of farm households and experts on their attitudes towards wetland cultivation The chi-square results show that likelihood ratio statistics are highly significant (P < 00001), showing a strong explanatory power of the model.
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
The results indicated that the assumption that, for all the cytokines evaluated, irradiation with Fe ions causes an increase in the levels of each of the cytokine evaluated that is highly significant (p value < 0,00001).
The detected linkage disequilibrium was highly significant in both cases (P<10 −5 ).
Seven other RSA traits were modified in both IL99 and Ruta reflecting the common response to LN (Figure 3a–g ) but showed a highly significant change in IL99 ( p < 0.00001) and lower significance in Ruta, including maximum number of roots*, number of root tips, total root length*, network area*, volume, surface area, and holes* (i.e., traits marked with* were advantageous in IL99 over Ruta under the LN treatment (Figure 3a–g ).
That study uncovered single highly significant effect ( p = 0.00001) showing ADHD adults had increased rightward P8–P7 beta2 asymmetry during the CPT, and in post hoc analysis confirmed that this result was specific to the beta2 frequency band.
The genotype × harvest season interaction was highly significant (Fg × hs = 4.00, p < 0.00001), indicating the presence of clones with distinct yield performance over time ( Figure 1 ).
A Chi-square test was conducted to assess the association between case distribution and seasons, revealing a highly significant relationship (Chi 2 = 519.324, p < 0.00001), suggesting a strong deviation from the expected seasonal distribution.
The test for overall effect was highly significant (Z = 9.38, P < 0.00001).
Estimation of the SNP effect from the haplotype effect Under the hypothesis that one SNP of each haplotype was expected to have a major effect on the recorded trait, direct observation of those haplotype alleles that showed a highly significant effect (P < .00001) on one trait allowed to select one SNP where the two alleles showed opposite effects on that trait.
Also, the random effect of study was highly significant for the half‐life analysis ( p < 0.00001), but there was no significant random effect of study for the percent recalcitrance model ( p = 1).
These results were highly significant (p = 0.00001).
At the population level, mean accuracy averaged over all participants and stimulus sets (including different word sets and continuous sentences from different speakers) was highly significant (mean accuracy r = 0.28, p <10 −5 , one-sample t test, df = 14).
To confirm that the reported effects are not isolated and support the structure of the comparisons shown, we ran Friedman tests as non‐parametric omnibus tests which yielded highly significant results (alpha band, p < 0.00001 , χ 2 = 115.93 , Kendall's W = 0.68 ; gamma band p < 0.00001 , χ 2 = 120.6 , Kendall's W = 0.7 ).
The combined effect for these inter-correlations was highly significant [Friedman ANOVA Chi Square ( N = 36, df = 2) = 72.00; p < 0.00001; Kendall Coeff. of Concordance = 1.0000 Aver. rank r = 1.0000].
Larger F ST and highly significant values were observed when distance matrices based on the U20_BFDSC genotypes were compared with those of East or South Asian and African populations ( p < 0.00001) ( Table 2 ).
The excess of transition paths is highly significant by a binomial test ( P < 10 − 5 ; here and below, we do not distinguish values of P below 10 − 5 ).
In addition, disease duration correlated highly significant (p<0.00001) with the mean longitudinal FA changes in all tract systems.
The depicted IBD segment in Figure 3 has a highly significant IBD score ( P -value < 1E-5).
Higher birefringence was measured in fascicular regions of picrosirius red stained sections relative to matched unstained sections in both tendon types, and these differences were highly significant ( p < 0.00001 for both SDFTs and CDETs).
The pooled HR remained highly significant (HR = 0.56, 95% CI 0.45–0.70; P < 0.00001) ( Supplementary Figure 1A ). 3.3.2.
However, the differences in mean distances within the groups were highly significant ( F = 128.13, P = 0.00001) [ Table 5 ].
There was a highly significant correlation in the methylation status of the MGMT promoter region and MGMT protein expression ( p < 0.00001, Fisher exact test).
Statistical analysis confirmed that the deviations from population norms were highly significant for the overall group (N = 123, p = 0.00001), as well as separately for girls (N = 59, p = 0.00001) and boys (N = 64, p = 0.00001).
We searched for differentially methylated regions (DMR) where 100 adjacent CpG sites on the BeadChip are regulated accordingly—only two genomic regions revealed such a highly significant enrichment of SA-DNAm changes ( P < 10 −5 ): the HOXB locus on chromosome 17 (SA-hypermethylated) and the keratin associated protein (KRTAP) locus on chromosome 21 (SA-hypomethylated; Supplemental Fig. 3).
Dunn’s post hoc test showed highly significant differences between the intermediary and dry periods ( p = 0.00001) and between the rainy and dry periods ( p = 0.000001).