“highly significant”

LR was observed in 80% of patients with postoperative AL (4/5) while only 9% of patients without AL (12/130); the difference was highly significant (p = 0.00001).

The tests are all highly significant, with p < 0.00001.

Both tests had highly significant permutation p-values, with P < 10 −5 for the KS and Wilcoxon tests, indicating that GWAS SNPs were over-represented among SNPs with high core scores.

Overall, highly significant PFS was achieved with ALK inhibitors compared to chemotherapy (HR 0.42 [0.35, 0.50; p < 0.00001]) (Figure 2 ).

While performance was similar among groups under nonaugmented feedback conditions [ F (2, 24) = 0.048; p = 0.95], a highly significant Group effect was obtained in the presence of augmented feedback [ F (2, 24) = 51.84; p ≤0.00001].

The overall effect was highly significant ( Z = 4.78, p < 0.00001) ( Fig. 2 ). 3.3.

These 27 Arabidopsis proteins ( Table 1 ) represent a highly significant (p<1e −5 ) enrichment for the gene ontology GO categories of phosphorus metabolic processes, protein metabolic process, cellular macromolecular metabolic process and biopolymer metabolic process.

An initial Pearson correlation analysis indicated a highly significant association with Nonpareil diversity and pH ( R = 0.51, p < 1 × 10 −5 ), along with weaker correlations to several other parameters.

The overall effect was highly significant (Z = 7.70, p < 0.00001), further supporting the effectiveness of this dosage.

For a test, we conducted chi 2 tests for some of the variables, but, as assumed, all results were highly significant (e.g., “gender”: chi 2 : 695303.9042, p < .00001).

Figure 7 a shows the relationship between LAI r and LAI-vc e by applying method (ii) with k r obtained by inverting Equation (7), which rendered highly significant statistical analysis ( Table 4 ) as expected ( R 2 = 0.94; b = 0.98; SEE = 0.71; RMSE = 0.15; p < 0.00001).

Investigating this association in a cohort of 227 medulloblastomas, we found that loss of chr3p was highly significant when searching for genomic regions tightly linked with CT (Fig. 5c , two-sided Fisher exact test, p < 10 −5 and two-sided Chi-square test, p < 10 −8 , respectively).

6b and 6f ) is highly significant ( p = 10 −5 ).

This difference was highly significant (Mann–Whitney U test, P < 10 −5 ).

The overall effect of surgery compared to sham surgery was highly significant (SMD 0.34, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.49; p<0.00001), while heterogeneity was large (I 2 =67%, p<0.00001).

The results showed a highly significant association between BRCA1 promoter methylation with breast cancer in Asia (OR = 8.78 [95% CI 4.15-18.56, p < 0.00001]).

The test for overall effect showed a highly significant result ( Z = 4.74; p < 0.00001), indicating that fever was significantly more likely in individuals receiving VLA15 than those receiving placebo.

Larger F ST and highly significant values were observed when distance matrices based on the U20_BFDSC genotypes were compared with those of East or South Asian and African populations ( p < 0.00001) ( Table 2 ).

The functional cluster F1 (Left Superior Temporal gyrus + Cingulate Gyrus + etc., see Table 3 ) was highly significant ( p < 10 −5 ) with all structural clusters.

This is a highly significant increase over previous levels ( t = 14.79, df = 94, P<10 −5 ).

Phenotypic correlation Highly significant correlations were found between dormancy and GA 3 content in tubers ( P <0.00001).

In the three effect model, SNP rs1048943 (CYP1A1 G/A) all demonstrated the highly significant association with cervical cancer (All p values < 0.00001).

The overall Repeated Measures ANOVA applied to compare the values of n i obtained for all three ant groups revealed a highly significant effect of the between-subject effect „group” ( F 2,117 = 27,297, P < 0.00001), a highly significant effect of the within-subject effect „time” ( F 9,1053 = 31.303, P < 0.00001), and a significant interaction „group” x „time” ( F 18,1053 = 1.721, P = 0.031).

This superiority of RBZ and RBZ + Laser compared to laser treatment in terms of a positive effect on BCVA were highly significant (WMD = 5.65, 95% CI, 4.44–6.87, P<0.00001 and WMD = 5.02, 95% CI, 3.83–6.20, P<0.00001, respectively), with no heterogeneity identified ( Fig. 2A and 2B ).

The amplitude of the N1 component showed a highly significant color adaptation effect [ F (1, 13) = 71.6, P < 0.00001].