“highly significant”

The differences were highly significant for both Fusobacterium and Porphyromonas (FDR-adjusted p -value < 0.00001, Fisher Exact test).

The conversion rate was 2.53% ( n = 133/5263) in the robotic and 11.94% ( n = 3874/32,442) in the laparoscopic group, and was highly significant to the favor of the robotic group ( p < 0.00001). 4.

In comparison between the same groups, the FS and FT of Cention N were statistically highly significant than GIC (Student’s t -test; P < 0.00001).

Seventy markers were excluded from the following analysis, as they showed highly significant departure from Hardy Weinberg equilibrium (P<10 −5 ), obtaining 5,192 markers for the following analysis.

There was a positive and highly significant correlation between the numbers of teeth on oral versus pharyngeal jaws ( r = 0.53 without P. nigra and r = 0.66 including P. nigra ; p < 0.00001; Figure 2 J).

Effect of SR on HR Figure 2 shows that the effect of SR is highly significant, although clinically small: 1.65 bpm [95%CI: 1.19, 2.11], p < 0.00001, random effect, or 1.40 bpm [95% CI: 1.05, 1.75], fixed effect.

The results showed that the effect size of connectivity difference remained highly significant: BNM—L Precentral Gyrus ( p < 0.00001); BNM—R Precentral Gyrus ( p < 0.00002); LC—Cerebellum ( p < 0.000001); LC—Hippocampus ( p < 0.0004); VTA/SNc—Cerebellum ( p < 0.000001); VTA/SNc—Putamen ( p < 0.0012); and VTA/SNc—Left MOG ( p < 0.0010).

This finding was statistically highly significant (Z = 5.44, P < 0.00001), supporting a strong association between the intervention and the outcome in cohort studies.

The standard post-operative treatment in most early trials was CMF polychemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil), but recent evidence suggests that there is a small but highly significant further survival benefit with anthracycline-based regimens (RR=0.89; 2 P <0.00001) ( EBCTCG, 2005 ), and these have become widely accepted as standard adjuvant chemotherapy.

The 2 mg dosage also showed a highly significant effect ( p < 0.00001, I 2 = 12%), with low heterogeneity.

CloneCNA accurately estimates the cellularity with highly significant positive correlation (correlation coefficient > 0.99, p < 1×10 −5 , and mean absolute error < 0.03) with the ground truth cellularity across all mixed samples (Additional file 2 : Figure S6), indicating CloneCNA can precisely reproduce clonal components.

The p value is highly significant (p < 0.00001), indicating a strong association between disease severity (as per Modified H&Y staging) and the occurrence of OH.

Both tests had highly significant permutation p-values, with P < 10 −5 for the KS and Wilcoxon tests, indicating that GWAS SNPs were over-represented among SNPs with high core scores.

In the Bodily Pain subscale, both groups demonstrated a highly significant reduction in pain levels postoperatively (IPL: p < 0.00001; HLL: p < 0.00001), underscoring the efficacy of the procedures in improving patient comfort and reducing pain perception.

The differences are relatively constant across the subjects, and a paired student's t test returned a highly significant difference between the two conditions (P < 10 −5 ).

The meta-analysis revealed substantial between-study variance (Tau2 = 684.19) and a highly significant Chi-squared test for heterogeneity (Chi2 = 330.07, p < 0.00001), indicating that the variation in effect estimates was predominantly attributable to differences among studies rather than sampling error.

The pooled analysis resulted in a highly significant difference in LDL-C changes relative to baseline between dapagliflozin and placebo [MD = 4.24; 95% CI (2.83, 5.64); P < 0.00001], with low heterogeneity (I 2 = 0%).

Analysis of the microarray data revealed that there was indeed a single, highly significant ( p < 10 −5 ) chromosomal cluster of genes negatively regulated by VHL-1 in a HIF-1–independent manner and that in total this cluster extended over 110 kb to include F56A4.9, Y45G12C.9, Y45G12C.12, and Y45G12C.2 in addition to the six genes validated by RNase protection assay.

3-way ANOVA for mechanical thresholds as a function of animal grouping, day of test, and paw tested was highly significant for all 3 factors (for animal grouping F 2,199 = 370.; for test day F 3,199 = 157.; and for paw tested F 3,199 = 1407.; p < 10 -5 for all 3 factors), for their pair-wise interactions (p < 10 -5 ) and for their 3 way interaction (p < 10 -5 ).

5 ) in test 1 and 61% in Test 2; “Treatment*Pre/Post” was negative and highly significant ( P < 10 -5 ; Additional file 6 : Table S2; Additional file 7 : Table S3).

These differences were highly significant (P < 0.00001).

This comparison clearly demonstrated that CSC-affected eyes had SFCT which was ~145 μm (34%) bigger compared to normal control’ eyes (weighted mean difference (WMD) = 145.03, 95% confidence interval (CI), 121.33–168.73) and that this difference was highly significant (P<0.00001), with heterogeneity identified.

Results Nadi Shodhana Pranayama showed a significant decrease in ART (p = 0.01) and Bhramari Pranayama showed a highly significant decrease in ART (p < 0.00001).

During the Conditioning phase, highly significant (p<0.00001) main group and training day effects were observed and those were sustained over the entire period of Conditioning.

In terms of knowledge regarding flossing, 88% dental and 64% medical students had heard about flossing, and the difference was highly significant ( P =0.00001).