In addition, viral titration of the supernatants displayed a highly significant ( p < 0.0001) reduction of extracellular viral infectivity ( Figure 3 B–G).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
Wound healing was markedly faster in both low and high dose CuSQ-treated groups as compared to the control and standard groups as they had highly significant greater area under the curve (AUC) throughout the study period ( p < 0.0001) ( Figure 6 C). 2.10.
extremely significantqualified
P values were represented as asterisks; p values of <0.05 were considered statistically significant: 0.01–0.05, significant (*); 0.01–0.001, very significant (**); 0.001–0.0001, highly significant (***); p<0.0001, extremely significant (****).
The results indicated that there was a highly significant association between PD-L2 and PD-L1 in these tumors ( p < 0.0001) [ 107 ].
Though lyso-Gb1 values at enrollment were widely distributed, they displayed a moderate and statistically highly significant correlation with disease severity measured by the GD-DS3 scoring system in all GD patients (r = 0.602, p < 0.0001).
In the middle quartiles ( Figure 4 D,E), donepezil-treated aged mice showed highly significant reductions in alveolar size compared to aged controls ( p < 0.0001).
Although risk group classification was highly significant on univariate analysis (p=0.0001; worsened outcome with increased risk group), this finding disappeared on multivariable analysis.
First, a highly significant effect was observed at 5 min post-dose (p < .0001), indicating an immediate influence of BHB on glucose suppression.
Furthermore, 58.8% of patients with gastric cancer had history of gastric diseases almost twice higher than those in healthy controls (28.1%), revealing highly significant odds ratio (OR 3.65, 95%CI 2.10-6.35, p<0.0001).
With regard to the AHI, highly significant differences were found between the four groups (Chi2 = 22, df = 3, p < 0.0001), with lower values in the LTG group compared to the POAG group (Hodges–Lehmann = −13.8, 95% CI (−18.6–−8.8; p < 0.0001) and the control group (Hodges–Lehmann = 12.1; 95% CI −19.9–−2.4; p < 0.02).
Statistical analyses revealed that this elevation was small (14.5 μg/g) but highly significant ( p -value < 0.0001).
ANOVA results revealed a significant ( p < 0.0005) and highly significant ( p < 0.0001) difference in genotypes and B toxicity treatment ( Table 2 ). 3.4.
A decrease in numbers of mosquitoes collected post-treatment at the ATSB treatment site, when compared with the control site, was highly significant for both females (t = 8.747, df = 13; p < 0.0001) and males (t = 11.91, df = 13; p < 0.0001).
Multivariate analysis of variance of rank-normalised FFQ data indicated a highly significant difference (p<0.0001) between classification groups.
The results show that the differences between strains, oils and antibiotics were very highly significant p < 0.0001 ( Table 3 ).
All correlations are highly significant (p<0,0001***, Spearman).
However, the maximum seasonal concentrations differed significantly between the sites (Kruskal‒Wallis p < 0.0001) and a highly significant latitudinal trend of increasing maximum vitamin D 3 at more southern sites was observed (Mann–Kendall trend test p < 0.0001).
A two-way ANOVA mixed effects model revealed highly significant effects for treatment group ( P < 0.0001), time point ( P = 0.0001) and treatment group x time point interaction ( P < 0.0001).
Standard mean difference (SMD) was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) for all comparisons (Stable_MCI versus MCI_AD: SMD [95%-CI] Aβ(1-42) = 1.19 [0.96,1.42]; T-tau = −1.03 [−1.24,−0.82]; P-tau = −1.03 [−1.47,−0.59]; HC versus MCI_AD: SMD Aβ(1-42) = 1.73 [1.39,2.07]; T-tau = −1.13 [−1.33,−0.93]; P-tau = −1.10 [−1.23,−0.96]).
Biomarker Confirmation through Targeted Immunoassay We observed a highly significant correlation between plasma SOMAmer intensity and TNNT2 concentration (r = 0.81, p < 0.0001) (Fig S8A ).
1. There is a highly significant difference between the stimulation induced by DR3 DPw3* PBLs and PBLs expressing only one or none of these antigens (P < 0.0001).
We find a highly significant correlation between p53 protein synthesis in leukemic blast cells and the secondary plating efficiency of these cells (p = 0.0001).
Pearson correlation analysis showed a highly significant correlation between Nat-LTP and Wt-LTP (R 2 = 0.9491, p < 0.0001, n = 27; Fig. 2 , large panel).
This was also highly significant at p < 0.0001.
When segregating the High Ratio Group (n = 1,934) into the 2% cutoff categories and then comparing TTFT, again a highly significant difference was seen ( Figure 2C ; median TTFT: 2.59 vs. 9.38 years; P < 0.0001).