Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Correlation of ELISpot Responses to Various BK Virus and JC Virus Peptide Pools Spearman analysis indicated that, in 17 HSCT recipients with BKV-related cystitis and in 50 healthy controls, responses to the BKV LT and VP1 peptide pools showed a highly significant correlation ( r > 0.7, p < 0.0001) ( Appendix B , Table A2 ).
highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The results from the ANOVA table revealed that the model was highly significant (P < 0.0001), while the lack of fit of each model was not significant (P > 0.05) revealing that the model adequately described the relationship between the independent variables (extraction time, solid to solvent ratio, % NADES content and amplitudes) and the dependent variables (TPC and DPPH).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Influence of centrifugation and residual platelet count on plasma PAI-1 activity levels, euglobulin clot lysis time (ECLT) and global fibrinolytic capacity (GFC) of plasma Correlation of plasma PAI-1 activity levels with ECLT and GFC was statistically highly significant, with a Pearson coefficient of 0.63 ( p < 0.0001) and 0.64 ( p < 0.0001), respectively.
highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Together with detection of a highly significant ( P < 0.0001, by unweighted UniFrac) difference in beta-diversity distance in the TWK10-hk group after administration relative to the TWK10 group, these findings indicate that six-week administration of heat-killed TWK10 has a stronger effect in rearranging microbial community structures than viable TWK10 ( Figure 3 B,C).
highly significantp ≤ 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Highly significant differences in life stages mortality among concentration were found by direct spray (df = 4, 149, p ≤ 0.0001) for 2nd instar: F = 26.01, 3rd instar: F = 22.20, 4th instar: F = 18.04, 5th instar: F = 13.63, and adult: F = 6.25 and by contact (df = 4, 149, p ≤ 0.0001) for 2nd instar: F = 16.06, 3rd instar: F = 9.95, 4th instar: F = 21.23, 5th instar: F = 6.29, and adult: F = 3.78 with an obvious decreasing pathogenicity pattern from younger to older instars to adult stage at all concentrations.
highly significantp -value<0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The hazard ratio in the Cox proportional hazards model is 2.619 (95% CI 1.733–3.956) with a highly significant p -value<0.0001, indicated that the ZingiVir-H treated group had a significant recovery period.
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
CNV Score and Cell Cycle Analysis in Right-Sided Colon Cancer The CNV score analysis ( Figure 3 A,B) revealed that Tumor cells had significantly higher CNV scores compared to B cells and Proliferating cells, with the difference being highly significant ( p < 0.0001, Kruskal–Wallis test and pairwise Wilcoxon test).
highly significantp -value < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
There were highly significant positive correlations between TEM and CTX (r = 0.98, p -value < 0.0001), pai (r = 0.96, p -value < 0.0001) and hly (r = 0.94, p -value < 0.0001), and also between CTX, and pai (r = 0.96, p -value < 0.0001) and hly (r = 0.95, p -value < 0.0001).