Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantP <0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Looking at the association between BCR reactivity of DLBCL cells and the presence of hypophosphorylated Ars2 isoform overall, considering data from both cell lines and cases with cryospecimenderived recombinant Fab, the association was statistically highly significant (Fisher exact t -test: two-tailed P <0.0001).
highly significantp < 10 −40.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The model turned out to be highly significant at the permutation test ( p < 10 −4 ), as shown in Figure 9C , and predictive with 100% correct classification rate. 4 Discussion In the present study, the longitudinal multi-omics investigation on a single mother-infant dyad was proposed to examine in depth the relationships among diet composition, gut microbiota metabolism and composition during the transition from breastfeeding to weaning.
highly significantP < .00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Furthermore, the regression models used to compute the correction equations for both sexes were highly significant ( F (1, 188) = 1185.8, P < .0001 and F (1, 108) = 593.0, P < .0001 for females and males, respectively) and the CV for the estimate from either model was less than 7.0, indicating that the level of precision was well within acceptable limits.
highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The agreement between the expected and estimated connective field locations shown in Figure 2 a (diagonal cells in the connectivity matrix) is further demonstrated by a highly significant mean (across subjects) Cohen's kappa value (M = 0.68, S.D. = 0.2, t 11 = 12.0, P < 0.0001).
Preserved retinotopic brain connectivity in macular degeneration.
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt · 2016 · PMC12868054
highly significantp <0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
However, the past five-year trend (2015-2019) was different where, the daily average of PM 2.5 and PM 10 levels (2015-2019) were higher by 70 and 155% when compared with the same time period in 2020 (Phase I), which was highly significant (Kruskal-Wallis test, p <0.0001) (Fig.
highly significantp < 0001the decimal point is missing; read as 0.0001qualifiedgold
Then, a two-way ANOVA factorial analysis revealed that the clinical state of the patients’ plasmas tested (“steady state” versus “acute phase”) had a highly significant effect ( p < 0001) on PS-exposure quantification.