“highly significant”

After 14 days of treatment, the analysis revealed a highly significant ( p < 0.0001) superiority of TBG in the primary efficacy variable. 1.4.

The most highly significant differences with a p < 0.0001 are identified between the two 3T devices of the different manufacturers.

This difference was statistically highly significant as the [ P < 0.0001, Table 2 ].

After excluding asystole patients with presumed CO = 0 L/min, the association between PetCO 2 and CO remained highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

as shown in Figure 8A , high risk score group revealed a highly significant difference in worse prognosis ( P < 0.0001).

Premature thymic aging in cALL survivors To determine the normal rate of T-cell compartment immunoaging we measured blood TREC levels normalized to the T-cell count in the Quebec reference population and observed a highly significant correlation with chronological age for both men and women (Pearson correlation: males, r = −0.466; females, r = −0.504; p < 0.0001) (Fig. 1A , controls).

Results and discussion The Procrustes ANOVA performed on the replicated subsample showed highly significant differences between sperm heads (MS sperms = 0.000388, MS error = 0.000001, P < 0.0001).

Very highly significant difference was found in the distribution of lip print patterns among males and females in the entire population, group I, and group III, respectively ( P < 0.0001).

Unpaired t-tests comparing the seronegative and seropositive populations yielded highly significant p-values (p<0.0001) for both the Immunetics® C6 Lyme ELISATM ( Fig 2A ) and the MicroB-plex Anti-C6/Anti-pepC10 Immunoassay ( Fig 2B ).

χ 2 test comparison of incidence and prevalence over the periods 2007 to 2014 (mean incidence 1.01/10,000, mean prevalence 0.88/10,000) and 2015 to 2021 (mean incidence 0.67/10,000, mean prevalence 0.33/10,000) showed a highly significant decrease ( p < 0.0001).

[ 23 ] identified human population density and total housing units as highly significant predictors of Ae. aegypti abundance (all p < 0.0001).

Notably, we found that each predicted group was associated with the highest median expression of its corresponding gene signature, and this difference in expression was highly significant in all groups ( P < .0001, Figure 2B ).

Using a list of 508 proteins with half-life <8 h ( Li et al., 2021 ), enrichment analysis (Fisher’s exact test) found no significant associations under either acidosis or hypoxia analysed separately, but a highly significant association (P < 0.0001) under acidotic hypoxia, specifically among downregulated proteins.

With a highly significant effect of enzyme concentration ( p < 0.0001), regardless of enzyme type ( p > 0.05), the fibrous appearance of the pork loin samples recorded higher mean scores, increasing from 5.67 ± 0.19 in the control sample to a range of 6.77–6.97 in all enzyme-treated samples.

85.35 ± 9.50 mg/dL; NS), highly significant (p < 0.0001). drop in fasting insulin levels was observed; after the follow-up period of 6 months, fasting hyperinsulinemia was diagnosed only in 6 (15 %) patients.

Additionally, linear models assessing the importance of location in describing the canonical function generated from linear discriminant analysis were highly significant ( R 2 = 0.857, p < 0.0001). 3.2.

However the main effect for visit was highly significant ( F (2,135) = 15.88, p -value < 0.0001).

Non-spatial linear regression of altitude on logarithm transformed concentrations of cyanogens showed highly significant association, (p < 0.0001).

All the models were highly significant ( p < 0.0001), describing a high degree of correlation between the experimental and predicted values.

As shown in Figure 3 , rEg.P29 alone did not induce a significant increase in specific IgG at 20 weeks post-immunization, whereas the formulation with Quil A adjuvant elicited a highly significant increase in rEg.P29-specific IgG ( P < 0.0001), confirming that Quil A is essential for inducing a robust IgG-dominant humoral immune response in sheep.

Pairwise comparisons showed highly significant differences (p<0.0001) between protected and unprotected lands, as well as between partially protected and unprotected lands.

Notwithstanding the smaller sample size at FP + 14, the platelet increase observed at FP + 14 was highly significant (p < 0.0001).

Similarly, the difference in a mean reduction in Y-BOCS scores was also highly significant at p=0.0001 (t=12.857, r=0.803; t=11.488, r=0.803 in men and women, respectively).

Bonferroni-corrected post hoc pairwise comparisons were all highly significant: 0 vs. 5 wt% (Δ = −7.12 MPa, p < 10 −4 ), 0 vs. 10 wt% (Δ = −9.99 MPa, p < 10 −4 ), and 5 vs. 10 wt% (Δ = −2.87 MPa, p < 10 −4 ).

The Datta and Satten Rank-Sum Test found that the distributions of the two groups was highly significant giving a test statistic of 8.05 and a two-sided p-value <0.0001.