A homogeneity test showed a large chi-squared value (x 2 = 72.58, 1DF) signaling a highly significant association between the type of visit and the residence/location of patients ( p < 0.0001).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
In the case of the SKOV-3 cell line, with high HER2 expression, a saturation of HER2 with an excess of unlabeled proteins resulted in a highly significant ( p < 0.0001 in unpaired t -test) reduction of binding of both proteins.
On the other hand, a highly significant regression was found for V 1 ( P < 0.0001; R 2 = 0.047, Figure 5B ) which is similar to the association of the NGS-58779 SNP marker using the same population structure ( P < 0.0003; R 2 = 0.037, Figure 5D ).
Fitting a reduced quadratic mixture × linear concentration model provided a highly significant explanation for observed response ( P = 0.0001).
As expected, a highly significant difference (p < 0.0001) was observed between the activity of the unmutated AS and CS minimal promoters in NFS-5 (Figure 2 B) and 18–81 (Figure 2 C) cells, while vector containing only the kappa enhancer exhibited little activity.
The Chi-squared test revealed a highly significant association between species (species represented by >50 cases) and causes of death (x 2 = 97.95; df = 12; p < 0.0001), indicating that mortality patterns varied considerably between taxa.
All correlations were highly significant ( P < 0.0001) and positive, and the coefficients ranged from 0.6211 to 0.7846.
To visualise the results, we plotted the 34 network edges between the TF nodes with highly significant correlations ( P <0.0001; Fig. 5 ).
The difference in MIC between the two agents against the standard isolate was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), whereas the difference in MBC was not statistically significant ( p = 0.1030).
Only the experimental group of combined CIP with PIC maintained a highly significant difference ( p < 0.0001) within 24 h for these two strains.
These findings were highly significant in all cases ( p < 0.0001).
Both workflows produced large, highly significant, and quantitatively comparable PC-versus-NC separation under genuine operating conditions (manual: Δ_CI = 0.096 and 0.103; Welch’s t = 19.83 and 21.95; p < 0.0001; Cohen’s d = 1.19 and 1.32; CSA risk scale Δ_P– N = 14.47 with biobank-derived urine-based materials and 10.17 with synthetic VOC standards).
This apparent clustering is statistically highly significant ( F = 8.69, P < .0001).
The mean time to perform SAB was shorter in group-A with value 3.03 ± 0.72 min which is statistically highly significant having P value < 0.0001 when compared to group-B with value 7.73 ± 1.44 min.
2B ) both showed highly significant differences in their growth curves after iron supplementation (p < 0.0001).
By one-way ANOVA, the main effect of genotype on all four genes was highly significant (p<0.0001), and for each gene, at least four of the six pairwise genotype comparisons showed significant differences in expression ( Supplementary file 3 ).
A one-way ANOVA confirmed a highly significant effect of condition on accuracy differences (F (2, 132) = 477.06, p < 0.0001).
There was a highly significant change in ACTH levels observed in the M, ELb, Esch, and ELbEsch groups ( p < 0.0001), and a pronounced difference was seen in the EThy group ( p < 0.001), as shown in Figure 3 c.
Besides, highly significant correlation coefficients were found (r = 0.80–0.93; p < 0.0001) when comparing RNA-seq and RT-qPCR results in each genotype, indicating a good consistency between the two analysis techniques and the two independent experiments ( Fig. 3B ).
Quantitation of this data indicated a highly significant (p < 0.0001) increase in FRET efficiency after SENP6 knockdown compared to siNT-transfected cells as well as a larger distribution of the data ( Figure 6 E), suggesting variability in the structure of the foci.
The differences observed revealed a highly significant increase in the size measurements made between visit 1 and visit 8 samples (p < 0.0001) (Figure 3 B) using Wilcoxon’s matched pairs test to measure significance.
Compared with the NC group, the TAA-treated group presented a highly significant increase in the serum total and direct bilirubin concentrations ( P <0.0001).
Under 200 mg/kg of Cd 2+ , the Cd 2+ contamination in the shoots and roots of transgenic plants was 24.6−30.5% and 45.5−51.3% higher than that of the WT, respectively ( Figure 4 c,d), and all of the transgenic lines showed a highly significant difference compared with the WT ( p < 0.0001).
The correlation with MacBlo is highly significant not only for the mean of the three sites ( r = 0.55, P < 0.0001; Fig. 2B ) but also for each of the individual sites ( r = 0.35, P = 0.0001: Hamma Hamma and MacBlo; r = 0.57, P < 0.0001: Lake Washington and MacBlo; r = 0.39, P = 0.0001, Price Lake and MacBlo).
For males ( N = 1,035), the regression was highly significant ( F = 55.177, p = .0001).