“highly significant”

In non-spatial linear models lichen cover showed highly significant differences by distance classes (F = 7.7, p<0.0001).

CD19 + CCR7 + showed a highly significant decrease on day 7 ( P < 0.0001), followed by a further significant reduction on day 14 compared to day 3 and baseline.

In contrast, inhibition of nitric oxide release by macrophages was highly significant ( P ≤ 0.0001) at higher 8A12 mAb concentrations (0.6, 1.25, 2.5, and 5 μg/mL) as shown in Figure 2 B.

4 C, the two signals exhibit a highly significant correlation ( p < 0.0001), demonstrating that the 35, 40 and 45 kD bands that we quantify in this manuscript are indeed caused by autoantibodies recognizing GFAP as an autoantigen.

These results were independent of LPS stimulation, and the differences against control experiments were highly significant ( p < 0.0001). 2.5.

Second, all the model statistics were highly significant ( p < .0001), excepted for the inferior lateral ventricle model for AD which was only significant ( p < .05). 3.3 Classification based on multiple lifespan models To evaluate the classification performance of HAVAs on testing datasets, we performed a comparison with the three most discriminant structures.

The change after age adjustment was 642 ± 125 to 581 ± 123 ORP units * TRT, also highly significant ( p < .0001).

For the IGRA, comparisons between ChAdOx/ChAdOx and both heterologous regimens also revealed highly significant differences ( p < 0.0001) with stronger results for the heterologous regimens, but no statistically significant difference between both heterologous regimens ( p = 0.812; see Figure 5 ).

3.6.2 Effect on the contents of the characteristic phenolic acid analogues For Y 1 , the developed model was found to be highly significant ( p < 0.0001), as shown in Table 4 .

In contrast, particularly at 10 μM, a highly significant ( p < 0.0001) anti-clonogenic effect (26% inhibition) was found in MDA-MB-468 cells after three hours of exposure; meanwhile, there was a gradual decrease with increasing TQ concentration, exhibiting a significant 90% inhibition of colony formation at the highest tested concentration, 50 μM.

In the multivariate logistic regression analyses (Table 4 ), confidence in the ability to use epinephrine in patients with anaphylaxis remained a highly significant predictor (OR = 2.84, 95% CI = 1.68–4.80, P = 0.0001).

By applying Design Expert 8.0.7.1 to fit a multiple regression to the data, the quadratic equation of Schisandra chinensis AC yield (Y) to each factor variable can be obtained as: (1) Y = 1.11 + 0.14 A + 8.3 × 10 - 3 B + 0.14 C + 0.067 A B + 0.098 A C + 0.15 B C - 0.21 A 2 - 0.16 B 2 - 0.29 C 2 The results of the regression model analysis shown in Table 7 indicate that this quadratic multinomial regression model had highly significant differences ( P < 0.0001), indicating a highly significant correlation between the three independent variables involved and the response values of AC.

Correlation coefficients were similar, and all correlations were highly significant ( p < 0.0001) ( Table 4 ).

Intercontinental ranked correlations of tree species richness per family between the two continents’ entire tree floras and moist and dry floras separately yielded correlation coefficients around 0.62 (all highly significant, P < 0.0001, Fig. 3 ).

A generalized additive model (GAM) fitted to the normalized data revealed strong non-linear temporal structure in activity under all light treatments, with highly significant treatment-specific smooths of time (all F > 380, all p < 0.0001), explaining 97.6% of the variance in normalised activity (adjusted R 2 = 0.97).

For FLNA linkages to all three receptors in synaptosomes from AD versus age-, gender- and postmortem-interval-matched healthy control brain tissue, two-way ANOVAs showed highly significant main effects of diagnosis (CXCR4: F = 22.30, p < 0.0001; CD4: F = 188.52, p < 0.0001; CCR5: F = 179.43, p < 0.0001) and treatment (CXCR4: F = 44.39, p < 0.0001; CD4: F = 140.48, p < 0.0001; CCR5: F = 35.78, p < 0.0001) and a diagnosis–treatment interaction (CXCR4: F = 22.29, p < 0.0001; CD4: F = 109.68, p < 0.0001; CCR5: F = 79.78, p < 0.0001).

The TNF-α reduction compared with the DSS group was highly significant in the AMEP-treated and standard-treated groups ( p <0.0001 in both), significant in the AME-treated group ( p <0.01), and not significant in the excipient-treated group ( p =0.2238) ( Figure 7d ).

For all parameters in the Friedrichs criteria in both active and placebo group, the p -value from screening to weeks 1, 2 and 4 was highly significant ( p value ≤ 0001).

A highly significant QTL (p < 0.0001) was detected on chromosome Z between microsatellite markers MCW258 and MCW241 (at 21.40 Mb and 34.26 Mb, respectively) [see Additional file 1 ].The effect of this locus was 15.28 HU.

This was supported by statistical analysis that revealed that the frequency of polarization in HIV-1-infected T cells was highly significant compared to contacts formed between two uninfected T cells (odds ratio [OR] at 10 min, 1; OR at 20 min, 9; OR at 60 min, 17.9; Fisher's exact test, P < 0.0001) ( Fig. 1C ).

The highest percentage of kidney pathology in PCR‐positive fish was detected in the 0+ fish age class (85%), this category shows a highly significant difference compared with age categories 1+, 2+ and 3+ ( p < 0.0001), whereas no significant differences were detected among the remaining groups (Table 1 ).

However, the addition of 100 mM KCl had a much greater (a 12-fold increase), highly significant ( p < 0.0001, two-sample t -test, N = 4 and N = 2 for 0 and 100 mM KCl, respectively, Fig. 3 A ) effect on the K d for the D3402A mutant MTBDs than WT MTBDs.

Results: Using Pearson’s correlation, tongue thickness was found to be highly significant in correlation with the Cormack-Lehanegrading along with ratio of Pre-E/E-VC thus to predict difficult laryngoscopy with a significant p value of <0.0001.

The p -value was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) and the lack-of-fit p -values were larger than 0.05 (0.1673, 0.6943, and 0.7078, respectively).

A very highly significant value of NDI among and between different exposed groups was observed ( p < 0.0001).