“highly significant”

Both 1 μg/mL and 5 μg/mL treatments led to a highly significant increase compared to untreated controls ( p < 0.0001) ( Figure 4 D).

Conversely, disease activity (estimated coefficient: 0.7397) and the use of biologics (estimated coefficient: 0.7080) were identified as highly significant and independent predictors of increased annual direct medical costs ( p < 0.0001).

When analyzed with respect to postnatal age, there were highly significant group differences in FB size between on-time and advanced births ( F (1,81) = 69.06, p < 0.0001; Fig. 4 A , left), as well as between on-time and delayed births ( F (1,60) = 56.91, p < 0.0001; Fig. 4 B , left).

Grasshopper dorsal surface pattern comparisons by species and sexes The MANOVA indicates highly significant differences in the patterns' descriptive parameters (Wilks' λ = 0.29 F 3,143 = 24.82, p < .0001), and the ANOVAs indicate that e max differs between species and sexes (Table 1 a).

The P -value after day 11 of the treatment remained highly significant (i.e., p < 0.0001) until all mice treated with control ADC, saline and hRS7 were euthanized ( Figure 7A ).

The analysis revealed a highly significant effect of sample source on Vibrio detection ( χ 2 = 38.78, df = 3, adjusted p < 0.0001).

A repeated-measure ANOVA [Rule (color/shape/no-match, within-subject factor] applied to the normalized EDA in color, shape, and no-match blocks showed a highly significant effect of Rule (F(2,48) = 13.15; P = 0.0001) (Partial eta squared = 0.35).

Line was highly significant for all field environments ( P < 0.0001 ) and greenhouse incubation period ( P = 0.0464), but not for the greenhouse DLA measurements ( P = 0.2187) (Table 1 ).

2 b); renal expression of NGAL was increased in CLP (48 h) animals compared to sham and stain intensity analysis across groups shows highly significant differences (CLP vs. sham 9.5 ± 3.4 vs. 3.5 ± 2.5, P < 0.0001; Fig. 2 c, d).

The results show that the differences between strains, oils and antibiotics were very highly significant p < 0.0001 ( Table 3 ).

However, both temperature and salinity were highly significant within the GLM ( p < 0.0001) (Table 1 ).

Likewise, there was a highly significant difference in dry biomass at all tested separation distances (p-value<0.0001) ( Figure 5C ).

Among those significant SNPs, 1,498 SNPs from the Cmax group, 65 SNPs from the T max group, and 1,491 SNPs from the AUC inf group showed highly significant associations with each parameter ( Table 2 , 3 and 4 , P<0.0001).

The Kruskal–Wallis tests revealed the differences between the median von Mises stress values for each species to be highly significant ( p < 0.0001). 3.3.

However, when the analysis looked at the telephone counselling intervention subgroup actually reached by telephone, in comparison to the 'no call' and control groups, there was a highly significant difference in favour of the intervention subgroup: 7.0 PP increase; p < 0.0001 [ 64 ].

ANOVA showed the existence of highly significant differences between groups (p < 0.0001).

An analysis of variance, with sense of closeness as the dependent variable and all nine variables as factors, was highly significant (F 11,17 = 25.89, p < 0.0001).

The regression model was highly significant as indicated by its P value (P < 0.0001); the P value indicated that the regression model had a high degree of fit.

4 , it comes out that the existence of a highly significant difference (p <0.0001; α = 0.05) between the proportions of the different professions; meaning that occupations strongly influence the profiles of infant flours users.

The effects of the study drugs on gut microbiome β-diversity at the OTU level were first tested statistically using a two-way NPMANOVA and the results revealed highly significant main effects for drug (F 4,65 = 3.35; p = 0.0001) and time (F 2,65 = 8.43, p = 0.0001), as well as a significant interaction (F 8,65 = 1.77, p = 0.0001).

The difference between the TRAP-N/CSP-RT (comb) (10/10) and TRAP-N/CSP-T (comb) (0/10) groups was highly significant (p<0.0001, Fisher’s exact test).

A highly significant association between IgG (p = 0.0001) and C3 (p = 0.002) positivity with specific histopathological diagnoses, while IgA showed no significant association (p = 0.987).

The regression of the distance between F ST and geographic distance in km was highly significant for all population comparisons (males collected in early summer, R 2 = 0.51, p < 0.0001; females collected in early summer, R 2 = 0.60, p < 0.0001; males collected in late summer R 2 = 0.71, p < 0.0001; females collected in late summer R 2 = 0.65, p < 0.0001) (Fig. 2 a-d).

The explant had a highly significant effect on regeneration ( p ≤ 0.0001).

Overall, insecticide treatments were highly significant (F 5, 30 = 45.5, p < 0.0001), with thrips populations significantly reduced by the following: spinosad (average 99% reduction compared with control plants), B. bassiana (94%), M. brunneum (93%), I. fumosorosea (62%), and 1% oil (58%).