“highly significant”

Screening effectiveness and variable significance For Step 1 models with no interaction terms, Age plus all five transformed trend variables and their squares were highly significant ( p < 0.0001), as shown in Table 2 .

The test revealed significant distinctions between the groups for miR-223-3p (p = 0.0163), miR-409-3p (p = 0.0274), miR-424-3p (p = 0.0009) and highly significant distinctions for miR-145-5p (p<0.0001).

There are also highly significant associations with measures of nuclear grade including nuclear membrane irregularity, ( p < 0.0001), nuclear size ( p < 0.0001) and nucleolar size ( p < 0.0001) (Fig. 5d ) and with high-risk histological patterns of disease (Fig. 5e ).

In C2C12 mouse myoblasts ( Figure 4 C), all shuffled variants showed highly significant increased functional transduction over rAAV1 (p < 0.0001), rAAV6 (p < 0.001–0.0001), and rAAV8 (p < 0.01–0.0001).

Comparative evaluation was done between Group I and Group II, Group I and control group, and Group II and control group, all showed highly significant difference ( P < 0.0001) [Tables 1 – 3 ].

pisum is bidirectionally regulated by temperature, as evidenced by a highly significant temperature × light intensity interaction (Two-way ANOVA: F 2,12 = 75.472, p < 0.0001) ( Figure 1 ).

The resulting quadratic model for Altenusin was highly significant (ANOVA: F = 14.07, p < 0.0001, Table S2) and showed good fit ( R 2 = 0.934, R adj 2 = 0.867, R pred 2 = 0.639, Table S3 and Fig.

This correlation was found to be highly significant (p<0.0001, n = 14, see Methods ).

Including the “both” category in the analysis and considering the variables as ordered (surgeons>both>physicians), the association with all three outcomes is highly significant (extended Cochran-Armitage test): recommending VCUG: P <0.0001, recommending continuous antibiotic prophylaxis: P <0.001, recommending surgery: P =0.003.

In Table 1 , the linear effect of BMI in the Cox model for men is insignificant ( p = 0.876), but the test of PH assumption is highly significant ( p = 0.0001).

After imputing missing studies in the funnel plot, adjustment of effect size for possible publication bias using the trim-and-fill correction results in decreased, albeit still highly significant estimate of pooled mean difference (adjusted = −0.36 logMAR; 95% CI: −0.44; −0.28; p < 0.0001).

Pearson’s correlation analysis ( n = 45) showed a powerful and highly significant positive correlation between daily As intake and the hazard index (r = 0.97, p < 0.0001), indicating that arsenic is the primary contributor to HI from the consumption of these dietary supplements.

The differential cellular distribution of ALCAM between pancreatic cancer and corresponding normal pancreatic tissue was highly significant ( P =0.0001, Table 1 ).

The difference between the sta-1(RNAi) and akir-1(RNAi) animals is highly significant (p<0.0001; one-sided log rank test).

This finding was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

Within the patient group, there was both a highly significant main effect of distractor expression (F(1,33) = 20.9, p < 0.0001) and a significant interaction of distractor expression by resting state group, F(1,33) = 8.6 p = 0.006.

Summed fluorescence values relative to BF long-latency activity ( Figure 2 c) indicated a highly significant difference across the four groups, illustrating a strong reduction of neuronal assembly magnitude with maturation (F (3,120) = 9.613, p < 0.0001, one-way ANOVA).

The results obtained by both techniques were coincident and the correlation between microarray data and those measured by RT-qPCR were highly significant (Pearson’s r = 0.69, P < 0.0001) in spite of the high difference in sensitivity and accuracy between these experimental procedures. 3.2.

Two-way ANOVA revealed a highly significant effect of the genotype and the distance from the soma on the number of intersections ( p < 0.0001, F (1,4023) = 37.46 and p < 0.0001, F (26,4023) = 163.7, respectively), as well as a highly significant interaction between those two factors ( p < 0.0001, F (26,4023) = 2.488).

24.46%, p < 0.0001), and there was a highly significant reduction in the post- compared to the pre-implementation group in the number who received a post-procedure prophylaxis (16.7% vs. 1.2%, p < 0.0001).

This level of co-expression is highly significant (bootstrap test, p-value<0.0001), which means that P450 physical clusters are highly enriched in co-expressed sequences.

Identification of Fluctuating Asymmetry Analysis of our data demonstrated a highly significant side × leaf interaction ( F 183,368 = 398.8, p < 0.0001), confirming the existence of FA in our sample and our ability to identify FA using repeated measurements of the given accuracy.

For Group 1 + 4, the effect of HA condition was highly significant, F (2, 20) = 38.1, p < .0001.

The correlation coefficient ( r 2) values range from 0.70 to 0.95 (0.70 [for professors], 0.89 [for assistant professors], and 0.95 [for associate professors]); F values are highly significant ( P < .0001) for all faculty subgroups.

A one-way ANOVA revealed a highly significant difference in Ki-67 expression among the four treatment groups (F = 41.40, p < 0.0001), with a large effect size (R 2 = 0.8923), indicating that approximately 89.2% of the total variance in Ki-67 expression was attributable to treatment effects.