“highly significant”

The model is highly significant to predict the therapeutic response (R 2 = 0.7789, P < 0.0001).

The quadratic model was found to be highly significant ( p < 0.0001) with an F -value of 38.91.

Hematology The GD0 group exhibited a highly significant ( p < 0.0001) increase in Hb levels, with a change of 3.70% compared to the control.

According to ANOVA, the model was highly significant with a p-value (p < 0.0001) to predict the response values.

Effect of Dapagliflozin in Comparison With Placebo on Manifestations of Worsening HF In a prespecified expanded, 4-component, composite outcome of time to first HF hospitalization, urgent HF visit, outpatient worsening event, or CV death (total number of events=1211), there was a highly significant benefit of dapagliflozin over placebo: hazard ratio (HR), 0.73 (95% CI, 0.65–0.82), P <0.0001 (Figure 1 ).

In contrast, both TCEP- and saline-treated animals showed a highly significant increase in nasal airspace ( Figures 4B, C ; p < 0.0001; n = 29).

The oral Candidal carriage in OSCC and OPMD was highly significant (p = 0.0001).

The model exhibited a highly significant fit, with an F -value of 452.49 and a P -value < 0.0001.

The ANOVA [ Table 3 ] showed that this regression model was highly significant ( P < 0.0001) with F value of 13.65.

As the unstressed yeasts, all tested compounds-treated yeast cells showed a highly significant higher growth rate (r = 0.3056 ± 0.0063 h −1 ; F ( 22,46 ) = 31.43; p < 0.0001).

Correlations between both (log transformed) measures of movement were highly significant (p<0.0001) in all deer and correlation coefficients ( r ) ranged between 0.36 and 0.73 ( table 2 ).

Moreover, our results showed that the overall average resistance of Salmonella isolated from M-hatcheries was higher than that of L-hatcheries ( p = 0.0013), while statistical analysis performed by using two-way ordinary ANOVA, showed that the difference in resistance to the individual antimicrobial was statistically highly significant ( p < 0.0001) ( Figure 3 ).

A Hotelling’s T 2 test confirmed that this difference was highly significant ( T 2 = 685.25, P < 0.0001).

This finding conforms to the results of the present study, mainly, for the winter season as the difference in classification accuracy between two models was +32.2 with highly significant at p -value < 0.0001 using paired t -test.

The difference in ulcer healing at 8 weeks was statistically highly significant ( P = 0.0001).

Interestingly, our formulation was capable of inducing a 1.65-fold higher immune response in rabbits than in cattle (i.e., a 65% increase); this difference was highly significant (p<0.0001; Figure-3a and b ).

The interaction between the two subgroups was highly significant ( p < 0·0001) ( Fig. 1 ). 3.3.

Its actual total was 501 papers, 1.53 times the expected value, and the difference was statistically highly significant ( p < 0.01% on the Poisson distribution with one degree of freedom).

This upregulation was statistically highly significant ( p < 0.0001) ( Figure 3 ).

Multilocus epigenetic heterogeneity between sites was highly significant (Φ ST from AMOVA = 0.286, P <0.0001), with about 28% of total epigenetic variance in the sample being accounted for by between-site differences.

The correlation of health practices related to vitamin D status with dental caries was highly significant ( p = 0.0001), and lesser exposure to sun was also significant ( p = 0.002) ( Table 2 ).

The high‐dose ARC‐520 group showed a highly significant reduction in HBsAg ( P < 0.0001) compared to placebo, with a mean reduction of 0.379 log IU/mL from baseline (Fig. 1 B).

The opposite effect was observed in Ségou Region, where peak incidence at those HFs where IRS was withdrawn after the 2016 campaign (n = 19) increased by an average of 106% (CI 95 63–150%) from year to year, also a highly significant difference-in-differences compared to the standard no-IRS HFs (p < 0.0001) (Fig. 3 ).

In addition, when comparing delta values of both groups, we observed in MTZ-treated patients a highly significant reduction (i.e., clinical improvement) for both RCSS ( p < 0.0001, Mann-Whitney; Fig. 4 b) and MBAS values ( p < 0.0001, Mann-Whitney; Fig. 4 d) with respect to the untreated group.

TotDis during the AC and NS periods (proxy for exploration) did not significantly vary between feed treatments (χ 2 = 0.46, df = 3, p = 0.93) (see Figure 7 ), but there was a highly significant effect of TL (χ 2 = 71.4, df = 1, p < 0.0001), i.e., the higher the TL, the lower the TotDis. 3.3.2.