“highly significant”

rmANOVA regarding response time showed a highly significant main effect of order, F (2, 38) = 12.13, p ≤ 0.0001, but not regarding condition, F (1, 19) = 1.36, p = 0.26, as well as no interaction effect of order and condition, F (1.24,23.56) = 0.22, p = 0.7.

The correlation between the five categories was highly significant for pain relief (P <0.0001), though not significant for reduced dysfunction.

reported that location effects were highly significant ( P < 0.0001), and wheat grown in Winnipeg with the highest altitude had the highest antioxidant activity 47 .

The three factors had a highly significant (p < 0.0001) effect on runoff and sediment loss.

The results of the one-way ANOVA showed highly significant differences between the different levels in each group ( p < 0.0001 for each group).

IL-19 and beta-defensin expression were also strongly correlated with each other ( r = 0.81) and highly significant ( P < 0.0001), suggesting that both biomarkers are involved in the same pathway of psoriasis pathogenesis.

control highly significant (e.g. in whole length, 32.0 vs . 59.9 mm; p < 0.0001), but were also significant between the two inoculation sets (N1 vs .

Our χ 2 analysis indicated that these group differences were highly significant ( Figure 7 ; χ 2 =36.7; df=1, p=0.0001), suggesting that the HIP14 knockout disrupts behavior-related correlated firing in striatum.

The result was highly significant ( H = 15,093.849 , p < 0.0001 ), confirming that the observed inter-dataset variations are not due to random fluctuation.

This difference was highly significant, with a p -value of <0.0001 and a mean difference of 7.8 h (95% CI: 6.0 to 8.0), indicating a prolonged analgesic effect when dexamethasone was added to the block, as seen in Table 2 and Figure 2 .

A Wilcoxon signed-rank test on absolute prediction errors (APE) confirmed that this difference was statistically highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

The difference in mathematics score was highly significant ( P value < 0.0001) between nonanemic noniron deficient (group III) and anemic iron deficient (group I), it was significant ( P value 0.001) between nonanemic noniron deficient (group III) and nonanemic iron deficient (group II).

Importantly, modulus at each scale was muscle dependent as evidenced by the highly significant muscle × scale interaction term ( p < 0.0001).

The survivability was highly significant in the medium supplemented with Zn ( p < 0.0001) and Ag ( p < 0.018).

A repeated-measures ANOVA on the transformed LHIPA revealed a highly significant main effect of task, F ( 1 , 29 ) = 458.076 , p < 0.0001 , with a large effect size ( η 2 = 0.827 ).

Comparison with the full data set of 180 outbreaks reveals a highly significant reduction in goodness-of-fit ( P <0.0001), indicating that the 1967–1968 outbreak was unusually large given prior estimates for R .

This trend was progressively accentuated at weeks 8 and 12 (W8, W12), when the differences between DM+ and DM– were highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

In addition, fecundity and the collective mass of seeds of a tiller were always tightly correlated: for all years, the correlations between the collective mass of CL seeds and the number of CL seeds were all highly significant ( r 2 from 0.79 to 0.91, all P < 0.0001), as were all correlations between the collective mass of CH seeds and number of CH seeds ( r 2 from 0.82 to 0.95, all P < 0.0001).

As shown in Table 1 , the analysis of variance (ANOVA) of the response surface quadratic model indicated that the regression model obtained was highly significant (P < 0.0001) with an F value of 263.99.

The results showed a highly significant reduction in the levels of total vitamin D ( P < 0.0001), VDR ( P < 0.0001), vitamin D 3 ( P < 0.05), and calcium ( P < 0.0001) in the serum of CRC patients compared to the controls.

However, the results also showed a highly significant difference between patients and controls regarding age (P≤ 0.0001, patients were higher than controls), whereas, in weight and body mass index (BMI) (P=0.0006 and 0.0002, respectively higher in controls compared to patients).

In the medial and inferior constrictor muscles, cricopharyngeal muscle, glottic and supraglottic laryngeal areas, arytenoid cartilages, contralateral major salivary glands highly significant dose reductions ( p < 0.0001) of more than 10 Gy were achieved in study treatment plan compared to standard treatment plan.

Combined ANOVA results revealed that variations among the RILs of both populations were highly significant ( p < 0.0001 or p < 0.05) for all six traits ( Table S2a,b ).

A highly significant correlation of cytoplasmic survivin staining was observed with higher Gleason Scores and advanced pT stages (p < 0.0001 each, Table 1 ).

The overall model was highly significant (Chi-square = 29.88, df = 6, p < 0.0001) with good discriminative ability (Harrell’s C-index 0.732, 95% CI 0.660–0.804), indicating how TP53 mutation is the predominant independent factor influencing outcome.